Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
I think they all hover between 7 and 8 except KP who hovers between a prick and a dick.
what he gets up to in his love life isn't relevant imoI think they all hover between 7 and 8 except KP who hovers between a prick and a dick.
This is possibly the most Cricketweb post ever.You could do it like the Mohs scale. The difference in hardness between Diamond (10) and Corundum (9) is much greater than that between all the other minerals.
So the best players after Bradman get nine, and you simply need to remember how big the gap is.
Well I have Burner, Bradman is definitely a 10Bradman played in a different era to these guys. Unless you've seen him play today, there's no need to drag him into this.
Mitch Marsh?nobody who makes it to tests should really get 3 or under
This really goes without saying. Otherwise if Bradman is 10 then no one else would get above 5.You could do it like the Mohs scale. The difference in hardness between Diamond (10) and Corundum (9) is much greater than that between all the other minerals.
So the best players after Bradman get nine, and you simply need to remember how big the gap is.
Bradman is a conspiracy. Just like moon landing. Never happened.Bradman does kinda ruin it
Finally, we got someone sticking to the point.Alastair Cook - 7
Hashim Amla - 8
AB de Villiers - 7.5
Michael Clarke - 7
Kevin Pietersen - 7.5
What we wouldn't give to have that as a top 3 now.Cook, Strauss and Trott!! England bored oppositions to death during that era.