I wouldn't be suprised if the SCG curator sees a 6 day test as a license to produce a flat batsman friendly pitch. As well as pressure from ICC/Cricket Australia/Cricket New South Wales for the match to last all 6 days to give TV viewers full value and ensure that gate takings are maximised.FaaipDeOiad said:I do hope for the sake of a good contest that there's a bit in the pitch for the bowlers, rather than the shocking Sydney wicket we saw two seasons ago for the Indian tour.
Yeah I think so too, which might make for some rather poor cricket in what could be a great spectacle. Also, it would I think give the World XI their best chance of winning, since with a long, strong batting lineup and a 6 day test with a pair of world class spinners, the longer the test goes and the higher scoring it is the better they will be for it. Australia's best chance to win is to prepare a pitch with a bit in it for McGrath and company that takes a while to start really turning, and hope their superior bowling class shows through.vic_orthdox said:I wouldn't be suprised if the SCG curator sees a 6 day test as a license to produce a flat batsman friendly pitch. As well as pressure from ICC/Cricket Australia/Cricket New South Wales for the match to last all 6 days to give TV viewers full value and ensure that gate takings are maximised.
2? Not necessarily.Scaly piscine said:I can't see Inzamam making the Test team either, he'd have to do very well in the next few months and for 2 of Dravid/Kallis/Tendulkar/Lara to do particularly badly.
How many of these players will play before then?howardj said:You must have access to some sort of crystal ball. How the crap do you know who is going to be in form in August (when the team is picked) or October (when the match is played)? I mean, let's get this right, and expose your flawed thinking
Not really.FaaipDeOiad said:Let's not forget that despite his below-par bowling of late Kallis is still widely considered an all-rounder,
Sehwag did reasonably well on that tour averaging 42. Sachin played only in the third match after a long injury gap and actually played a matchwinning knock in the next match. So Dravid is the only one whom the aussies would have a bit of an edge over.FaaipDeOiad said:Let's not forget that only a few months ago McGrath, Gillespie, Warne and Kasprowicz effectively routed the Indian batting lineup which included Tendulkar in two tests and Dravid in all of them, as well as Sehwag (another certainty for this side), and Laxman who had caused them problems in the past.
That's kind of the point. None of those guys will have played for a long time, therefore you will not know who is in form. Accordingly, to use form as your sole basis for picking the team is ridiculous. Got it now?marc71178 said:How many of these players will play before then?
I'd say about none?
The boys got confidence, it good to see.Deja moo said:Its interesting how Sehwag has already decided hes going to make the final eleven. All his recent interviews have him saying how honoured he feels to be chosen to take the field for the world against the best team in the world.
Confidence, yes. But surely its disrespectful to the other openers in the squad ?chaminda_00 said:The boys got confidence, it good to see.
Why, if he isn't going to talk himself then who is.Deja moo said:Confidence, yes. But surely its disrespectful to the other openers in the squad ?
I certainly don't mind him being in the final IX. He's one of the players i'm hoping will put on a great batting display. when he gets going it's a treat to watch!Deja moo said:Confidence, yes. But surely its disrespectful to the other openers in the squad ?
I don't think there's much doubt.Deja moo said:Its interesting how Sehwag has already decided hes going to make the final eleven. All his recent interviews have him saying how honoured he feels to be chosen to take the field for the world against the best team in the world.