• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Pick your 30!

tooextracool

International Coach
BoyBrumby said:
Well, admittedly they selected 39 players so all bets are off really, but 25 of my 30 made it into at least one squad.

Attapattu, Cairns, De Villiers, Fleming & Oram were the unlucky men.
managed 27, it was an absolute slap in the face for me that jayawardhene and fleming didnt make it, given how highly rated those too are. but unfortunately they got those 2 right, something that i didnt expect.
what they did get wrong though was not picking chanderpaul, the third unlucky member of my squad.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
blockbuster said:
err. Not really mate. Who in the English middle-order is going to supplant Lara, Tendulkar, Dravid and Kallis?
I can't see all 4 of them playing to be honest.

Certainly not if they pick a team based on form rather than previous reputation.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Steulen said:
I'm guessing Tendulkar will be moved up the order to open alongside Sehwag so Flintoff can play at 6 in the Test.
That would be ridiculous - selecting him for the sake of it.
 

a massive zebra

International Captain
marc71178 said:
I can't see all 4 of them playing to be honest.

Certainly not if they pick a team based on form rather than previous reputation.
Dravid and Kallis are in top form and you can never rule out a barrage of brilliance from the mighty Lara.
 

pakster

U19 12th Man
Im surprised the likes of Youhana and Inzamam havnt been mentioned more, both are more than capable batsmen, naturally attacking and in relativley good form. One of the 2 should definatley be picked in the ODI team, perhaps at the expense of one of the slower players - dravid or Kalis.

SRT should not be an automatic choice IMO, he's not the player he once was and has been in terrible form of late.

The team to beat Aus...

Sehwag - In good form, excellent record against Aus.

Strauss/Trescothick - Im leaning towards strauss here, opening with both Tres and Sehwag may b a bit of a gamble

Lara - Can stabalise the innings if needed or continue to build on a good start.

Dravid (Piterson/Afridi in the ODI) - Like lara, can stabalise the innings.

Inzamam - Chosen over SRT due to form.

Kalis - Good form, provides an xtra bowling option.

Flintoff (assuming he's fit enough to bowl, otherwise, Pollock)

Sangakara - best keeper/batsmen in the world

Murali - No one comes close in the spinning dept IMO

Akhtar - May be a bit of a liability, but his pace will definatley cause damage.

Harmison - Extracts good bounce, different type of bowler to Akhtar.


Bat's up to number 8, 2 out and out pacers, 2 med pacers and a spinner - the perfect balance.
 

biased indian

International Coach
pakster said:
Im surprised the likes of Youhana and Inzamam havnt been mentioned more, both are more than capable batsmen, naturally attacking and in relativley good form. One of the 2 should definatley be picked in the ODI team, perhaps at the expense of one of the slower players - dravid or Kalis.

SRT should not be an automatic choice IMO, he's not the player he once was and has been in terrible form of late.

The team to beat Aus...

Sehwag - In good form, excellent record against Aus.

Strauss/Trescothick - Im leaning towards strauss here, opening with both Tres and Sehwag may b a bit of a gamble

Lara - Can stabalise the innings if needed or continue to build on a good start.

Dravid (Piterson/Afridi in the ODI) - Like lara, can stabalise the innings.

Inzamam - Chosen over SRT due to form.

Kalis - Good form, provides an xtra bowling option.

Flintoff (assuming he's fit enough to bowl, otherwise, Pollock)

Sangakara - best keeper/batsmen in the world

Murali - No one comes close in the spinning dept IMO

Akhtar - May be a bit of a liability, but his pace will definatley cause damage.

Harmison - Extracts good bounce, different type of bowler to Akhtar.


Bat's up to number 8, 2 out and out pacers, 2 med pacers and a spinner - the perfect balance.
u wont be able to bowl out Aus twice witt that bowling line up u need 4 regular bowlers
 

biased indian

International Coach
Steulen said:
I'm guessing Tendulkar will be moved up the order to open alongside Sehwag so Flintoff can play at 6 in the Test.
why should they do it if he id in the team he will be coming at 4 or 5 no where else

but on current form i doubt he will make it into it, And he is not left with many chances to improve up on that
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
biased indian said:
u wont be able to bowl out Aus twice witt that bowling line up u need 4 regular bowlers
Flintoff is a regular bowler, the only better non-Australian pace bowlers around at the moment are Pollock, Akhtar and Harmison.
 

a massive zebra

International Captain
Scaly piscine said:
Flintoff is a regular bowler, the only better non-Australian pace bowlers around at the moment are Pollock, Akhtar and Harmison.
So Flintoff is a better bowler than Murali, Vaas, Ntini, Kumble & Kaneria?
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
marc71178 said:
That lineup does have 4 regular bowlers though.
You have earlier stated Flintoff to be the 3rd seamer in England above Simon Jones.

I would like you to explain/elucidate and make clear why Flintoff is regarded so highly as a bowler.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
a massive zebra said:
Especially with just one five wicket haul in 45 matches.
Well Flintoff wasnt much of a good bowler early on. Thats a weak arguement for him not being a good bowler currently.
 

a massive zebra

International Captain
Pratyush said:
Well Flintoff wasnt much of a good bowler early on. Thats a weak arguement for him not being a good bowler currently.
OK...how about no five wicket hauls in the last 12 months?

And he cannot be that great at the moment if he has only ever taken one five for.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
Pratyush said:
You have earlier stated Flintoff to be the 3rd seamer in England above Simon Jones.

I would like you to explain/elucidate and make clear why Flintoff is regarded so highly as a bowler.
All he says is that Flintoff is a regular bowler.

Surely that can't be argued, with about 25-30 overs every match?
 

Top