• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Perm's behaviour

Is Perm's behaviour acceptable?


  • Total voters
    22
Status
Not open for further replies.

Athlai

Not Terrible
The Fiery-Perm feud is pretty dire on both counts IMO yet on the overall Perm's a fine addition to CW. Heath raises the point of Perm's posts degenerating somewhat yet while I disagree to the extent he feels it has slumped to I agree there has been a change, possibly due to the said feud. Reckon he'll be up to his usual standard in no time personally, we all have rough patches.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
You wouldn't happen to have MSN would you Prince?
He does, prince.ews @ cricketmail.net. Sure he won't mind me saying.

Either way, I might as well post my comments on the matter at hand - when I first returned to CW almost a year ago (7th January '07), Perm struck me as probably the best new member of the great many who had joined in my long, long (8-month) absence, though there were a good few contenders. I was very much disappointed when he declared he was leaving a couple of months later. I was interested, though, when someone (who shall remain nameless) told me they thought his posts had been getting "darker, more cynical" of late. This, obviously, was something I couldn't comment on because my only experience of him was said "of late" time.

Anyway, he returned within a few weeks, and for the first month or so my thoughts remained moreoreless precisely as they had done beforehand. Then the trouble started, driven more than anything it seemed by that confounded trouble-maker SW\BLE.

After a few weeks of decidedly not-getting-on, we pretty well patched-up and for the next 4 months or so barely had a bad word to say about each other (most of the time with us both being on the Staff). Then things went downhill again, this time worse than ever. Not only with myself, either - there were several instances of him receiving censure for conduct towards other members. Once or twice, I felt the vitriol was deserved (that bond21 clown, for instance), but mostly (I recall particularly one case with Laurrz, who has to be one of the most unmalicious posters on here) I felt he was out-of-line.

Matters between myself and him were, in my - perhaps misguided (I'm not a mindreader but I am I think pretty decent at deducing motives) - perception, exacerbated by the fact that I have a decidedly low opinion of two people who he seems to like greatly, they being Beevs and Voltman. At this time, I could say beyond reasonable doubt that he was trying a great many things in attempt to get me into trouble, the most outrageous as far as I was concerned being the fact that he tried reporting posts because I had done something he'd never once said he didn't want me to do (ie, mention his name on the forum).

Anyway, he received a 7-dayer, which I felt was deserved, and to his great credit he spoke to me during that time and said he felt he was out-of-line and apologised to me. Since his 7-dayer, I can't recall a cross word between the two of us.

Most interesting of all, though, was the fact that several people spoke to me about the subject and felt he was being such a pratt at that time because he was attempting to ape Dan Smith's posting style. This wasn't something that had occurred to me, at all, but it clearly had to several others (whether those people had conversed about it I wouldn't have a clue). Whether there's any truth in it, perhaps only one person knows.

Regarding his never-ending battle with Fiery, I've almost always, I regret to say, sided with the man from Clutha Valley. There's many a standpoint that Fiery takes that irritates me intensely (and, inevitably of course, that works in reverse too). Nonetheless, there's times when I've felt both parties have been out-of-line, as there have been times when several other parties have felt I've been out-of-line in my similar feuds with 1 or 2 other members.

One other thing - isn't the predictions-league on hiatus currently? Thus, is there really any need for the forum to even be visible currently, never mind Perm be a Mod? It'd undoubtedly be far better for everyone if Fiery could ignore Perm, would save a whole lot of unneccessary crap.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Sorry Perm, but when I joined you were easy to get along with, but the past couple of months you seem to have been developing a bit of a patronising, supercilious streak which sometimes makes it hard to see past the crap to the quality which can be found underneath. Your recent posting has put me off reading your posts somewhat - suffice it to say, its much easier to ignore you than bother reading some of your posts in the potentially wasteful hope of finding something worth reading.

I'd like to think that I'm quite laid back, fairly tolerant and don't let things annoy me too much; certainly my sense of humour is quite self-deprecating, so its really come to something for me to have to say this but given your current posting - I think this site would be better off without you. Not to say you're the only one to fall into that category, potentially.
Agree with the bolded part, far too aggressive recently (haven't been around much since your ban though so maybe you have got better again). used to think you were a great poster itbt.
 

Johnners

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Unacceptable, but then, Fiery's hasn't been all that much better either. I don't think I'd be alone in saying that between the 2 of them, they've singlehandedly brought the atmosphere of the entire forum down.
 

Fiery

Banned
Unacceptable, but then, Fiery's hasn't been all that much better either. I don't think I'd be alone in saying that between the 2 of them, they've singlehandedly brought the atmosphere of the entire forum down.
OK, here's a public apology Clapo:

I apologise to everyone for my part in bringing the atmosphere of the forum down. I will try not to get in arguments with Perm from now on.....and yes, I mean it
 

alternative

Cricket Web Content Updater
TBH i want Richard banned for this new year, know it wont happen for obvious reasons but it should have happened atleast once by now. Sick of this bull**** everytime.

****in hell.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
TBH i want Richard banned for this new year, know it wont happen for obvious reasons but it should have happened atleast once by now. Sick of this bull**** everytime.

****in hell.
Jeez. Altoz fairly drunk with the Christmas spirit, it seems. :laugh:

In Xmas vino veritas tho, as yer Romans didn't say.
 

nightprowler10

Global Moderator
Perm's behavior degenerated quite a bit IMO leading to the months before his ban, highlight being telling Richard to **** off and die for making a birthday thread. But I haven't seen much wrong since then besides the duels with Fiery.
 

Flem274*

123/5
Flame war, welcome to the flame war, the biggest war in history, Permy, Perm the Spermy, trades abuse with Fiery.......

YABADABADOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top