And anyone that has watched cricket for any length of time will know that since time began umpires have made mistakes and there is nothing you can do about it because that is the part of cricket that makes it a gentlemens game (accepting the umpires decision).Choora said:This is clearly pathetic. I have been a big critic of Woolmer, but i would never say that Pakistan fared poorly only coz of woolmer. If Coaches is all that takes to turn a team into champs then Bangladesh should have been doing wonders.
Pakistan batting has been poor since a decade, the fielding has been poor ever since they started playing cricket.Anyone who knows Inzi and Youhanna would know that their running b/w wkts would never improve no matter how hard a coach tries that( be it be Miandad or Woolmer), and Pakistan certainly didn't concedes extras anywhere where they use to do .So why blame Woolmer?
The fact that their second string bowling attack (whose opening bowllers haven't got even 100 ODI wkts ) fought wonderfully against champion batsman proves that Woolmer certainly didn't do such an awful job to call him hopeless.
If the umpires in question tries to attack Woolmer by using scallywag's logic then it will proove that not only they are inefficient but they are also idiots!
And you are right anyone using that tactic are not only inefficient but an idiot and the only one using that tactic is Woolmer which makes him?.