• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in India ODIs/T20s 2017

Burgey

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
How cool that former Wimbledon finalist Malavi Washington is playing or the BCCI Board XI
 
honestbharani

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Washington Sundar continues to impress though. Really wish his batting comes along, need a left handed hitter/spinner in our LO line ups, now that Jadeja seems to have given up trying to be any sort of a batsman in the LO arena.
 
weldone

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Pat Cummins is bowling too - which means he's fit. So, Richardson should be dropped from first ODI squad.
Agar has out-bowled Zampa - which makes things interesting too.

Head, Maxwell, Stoinis can easily bowl 20 overs among themselves in Indian conditions (Smith's decision to not bowl Maxwell in this match is ITSTL). In that case, Australia needs 3 specialist bowlers. I'd go for Cummins-NCN and Agar/Zampa - maybe Agar because of his batting. Faulkner can be dropped imo because Indian batsmen have routinely bossed him.
 
Last edited:
Gob

Gob

International Coach
Cummins really isn't a very good OD bowler. Allthe more reason why he shouldn't be in this squad.
 
TheJediBrah

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
weldone said:
Pat Cummins is bowling too - which means he's fit. So, Richardson should be dropped from first ODI squad.
Agar has out-bowled Zampa - which makes things interesting too.

Head, Maxwell, Stoinis can easily bowl 20 overs among themselves in Indian conditions (Smith's decision to not bowl Maxwell in this match is ITSTL). In that case, Australia needs 3 specialist bowlers. I'd go for Cummins-NCN and Agar/Zampa - maybe Agar because of his batting. Faulkner can be dropped imo because Indian batsmen have routinely bossed him.
Click to expand...
Smith has refused to bowl Maxwell in ODIs (meanwhile bowling Travis Head constantly) for the last year.

Looking at the Aus squad, they are going to have a surplus of bowling options regardless of who they pick. Probably could have sent an extra batsman (eg. Handscomb) if they were really paying attention when picking the squad
 
TheJediBrah

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
TheJediBrah said:
Smith has refused to bowl Maxwell in ODIs (meanwhile bowling Travis Head constantly) for the last year.

Looking at the Aus squad, they are going to have a surplus of bowling options regardless of who they pick. Probably could have sent an extra batsman (eg. Handscomb) if they were really paying attention when picking the squad
Click to expand...
And what do you know just announced that Handscomb is flying over as cover. Hopefully he is ahead of Cartwright in the pecking order at least when it comes to selection.

Warner
Head
Smith
Handscomb
Maxwell
Stoinis
Wade
Faulkner
Zampa
random fast bowler
random fast bowler
 
weldone

weldone

Hall of Fame Member
Warner
Head
Smith
Handscomb
Cartwright
Maxwell
Stoinis
Wade
Agar
Cummins
NCN

will be better
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top