• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** 4th Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground

Legga

Banned
I am just watching a replay of todays action.
That Stuart Clark off-cutter to get rid of the Seth African was a great one.
Clark should be opening the bowling instead of Lee.
 

Legga

Banned
Pace ain't much use if after two overs you loose swing.
Clark has only got one more test at first drop anyway, so he will get his rightful spot soon.
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Legga said:
Pace ain't much use if after two overs you loose swing.
Clark has only got one more test at first drop anyway, so he will get his rightful spot soon.
Exactly, so you put them on before the ball loses it's swing.
 

Legga

Banned
Matteh said:
Exactly, so you put them on before the ball loses it's swing.
Lee has not been taking early wickets this series so his pace is not of much use either.
I would prefer the line and length of Clark.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
You already have the line and length of McGrath though. I think the variation in the new ball attack of Lee and McGrath is perfect. Lee isn't in the best of form at the moment but the balance is still right and I think it should stay as such.

You could possibly make a case for Clark knocking McGrath off the opening bowler spot, but considering the next season is McGrath's last, also happens to be in front of his home crowd and just so happens to be a dead rubber anyway... I think it might be a bit harsh.
 

TT Boy

Hall of Fame Member
The Baconator said:
Suppose the one good thing about us being so crap is the there's no cricket to clash with Chuck Norris week on Bravo.
For sure, got Missing in Action 3 on tonight I believe, roll on Invasion USA. Also Zone Thriller have a plethora of soft core Shannon Tweed porn on which is always good for a laugh or something else.
 

Craig

World Traveller
TT Boy said:
For sure, got Missing in Action 3 on tonight I believe, roll on Invasion USA. Also Zone Thriller have a plethora of soft core Shannon Tweed porn on which is always good for a laugh or something else.
Showing American Pie again?
 

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Mister Wright said:
I think I saw McGrath with a bent arm in one of those pics...hmmm...:ph34r:
It's time to get tough with these cheats...let's stick some white labels on him, clear him, and then get on with the game.
 

Matteh

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Hoggard got out because according to that picture he wasn't actually using a bat.
 

Josh

International Regular
Matteh said:
Hoggard got out because according to that picture he wasn't actually using a bat.
Most the English can't figure out how to use them anyway.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
chris.hinton said:
Simply Awful.. i said before and i will say it again they have to be changes from top to bottom in Organization so this does not happen again
And I'll ask again how this reorganization would've changed this series?
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Prince EWS said:
Yeah, both were certainly out IMO. Hayden was also out twice not given (I think he was on 0 at the time too - went on to score 150+), and Symonds once not given (on 20 odd - went on to score 150+ as well.)

Really though, no matter how bad the umpiring was, you can't lose by an innings and 99 and blame the umpiring. Rudi is lucky the game was by no means close because both sides had very rough decisions go against them.
That said, had the 2 been given, there's no way Australia would've had a lead big enough to win by an innings.

Still what goes around comes around and I'm sure some day in future England will get the benefit of a couple of calls like that.
 

PhoenixFire

International Coach
marc71178 said:
That said, had the 2 been given, there's no way Australia would've had a lead big enough to win by an innings.

Still what goes around comes around and I'm sure some day in future England will get the benefit of a couple of calls like that.
They got evened out from 2005, we had a few crucial desicions go our way that could have lost us the series had they gone otherwise.
 

Top