• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Money can’t buy you cups

Raghav

International Vice-Captain

"I bet he was well pissed off when Inter dumped Chelsea out of the Euro Champs. All that money, up to £160,000 a week, plopping into the pockets of Terry and Lampard and Drogba, being feted and cosseted, but doing no real work in return, showing no fire or energy, just take take take."


Money can't buy you cups
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Money alone doesn't win cups, but it does help. You only have to look at Chelsea's pre and post Abramovich records.

Author weakens his point by referring to Fulham as an example of a non-moneyed club too; before Al Fayed took over they were flitting between the second and third tiers and hadn't been in top flight for (I'd guess) 30 years. Uncle Mo might not have Roman's bottomless pit, but by any reasonable measure he's one of the super-rich.
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Money alone doesn't win cups, but it does help. You only have to look at Chelsea's pre and post Abramovich records.

Author weakens his point by referring to Fulham as an example of a non-moneyed club too; before Al Fayed took over they were flitting between the second and third tiers and hadn't been in top flight for (I'd guess) 30 years. Uncle Mo might not have Roman's bottomless pit, but by any reasonable measure he's one of the super-rich.
More like third and fourth
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Money alone doesn't win cups, but it does help. You only have to look at Chelsea's pre and post Abramovich records.

Author weakens his point by referring to Fulham as an example of a non-moneyed club too; before Al Fayed took over they were flitting between the second and third tiers and hadn't been in top flight for (I'd guess) 30 years. Uncle Mo might not have Roman's bottomless pit, but by any reasonable measure he's one of the super-rich.
Even that's misleading.

The most important person at any football club is the manager. Split the Abramovich era into with Mourinho and without him and I'd wager that there'll be a pretty wide gulf.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Actually IIRC Ranieri's last season wasn't that bad and he was the one who bought most of the team that went on to win the league under Mourinho - could it be they needed time to bed in?
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
Actually IIRC Ranieri's last season wasn't that bad and he was the one who bought most of the team that went on to win the league under Mourinho - could it be they needed time to bed in?
No it wasn't, and with the exception of Carvalho and Drogba, the spine of the team was either signed by Ranieri, or in the case of John Terry, developed by Ranieri.

Still didn't win anything mind. That didn't happen until Mourinho.
 

Top