Mitchell Marsh vs. Kane Williamson

[mr_mister]

man people really rated KW's part time junk for a while

 

[cnerd123]

he was decent while he was chucking it tbf

 

[Dan]

man people really rated KW's part time junk for a while

tbf 2010 was not far away from when the miles on Vettori's body (and his mind, courtesy of being captain-batsman-bowler-coach-manager-bus driver all at once) were really catching up on him.

Like within a couple of years they'd got Bruce Martin into the side. It's not beyond the realms of possibility that KW could have been the 'lead' spinner and been no worse than some of the specialist options.

 

[Fuller Pilch]

man people really rated KW's part time junk for a while

Almost threw us to a 5th day win vs England in 2013 (took 4/44 when England finished on 315/9 chasing about 460).

 

[JBMAC]

Marsh is a "has been" who like his brother failed to reach their full potential. If you were comparing sets of brothers then the Marshes would be running distant lasts to the Chappells, and The Waughs for example. Hell I would even put the Benaud brothers in front of them

 

[SteveNZ]

man people really rated KW's part time junk for a while

It wasn't horrible. Especially decent to left handers. His international numbers aren't bad, especially T20

 

[Bolo.]

Marsh is a "has been" who like his brother failed to reach their full potential. If you were comparing sets of brothers then the Marshes would be running distant lasts to the Chappells, and The Waughs for example. Hell I would even put the Benaud brothers in front of them

Marshes would come in behind a whole lot of pairs of Aus brothers who were only children.

The real question though, is Waughs or Chappells?