• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

James Anderson vs Andy Roberts

Who is the greater test bowler?


  • Total voters
    42

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
I just think Roberts is a more skilled bowler.
Shane Bond was a more skilled bowler as well, as was Bruce Reid. And actually, Jimmy's skillset is underrated. Don't think skills were really what kept him apart from that top echelon
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Shane Bond was a more skilled bowler as well, as was Bruce Reid. And actually, Jimmy's skillset is underrated. Don't think skills were really what kept him apart from that top echelon
They didn't have enough of a career to be judged really, Roberts did, especially with World Series Cricket.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
Home kinda does too.
Yeah but that's kind of my point, Jimmy was too reliant on cloud cover and dukes to be better than Roberts, great bowler with a long career but the quintessential fairweather bowler with some nice performances outside it, here and there but never consistent.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah but that's kind of my point, Jimmy was too reliant on cloud cover and dukes to be better than Roberts, great bowler with a long career but the quintessential fairweather bowler with some nice performances outside it, here and there.
In Home matches over Roberts' career, the overall average was 32 and of WI bowlers was 27.3 with Croft leading with 17 playing 10 of his 18 games. Roberts was just relatively mid at home. Don't think has the record to justify being placed over Cummins, Walsh, Pollock, Rabada and Jimmy. Definitely on the very same tier but at the bottom with the least longevity and 2nd worst average.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
In Home matches over Roberts' career, the overall average was 32 and of WI bowlers was 27.3 with Croft leading with 17 playing 10 of his 18 games. Roberts was just relatively mid at home. Don't think has the record to justify being placed over Cummins, Walsh, Pollock, Rabada and Jimmy. Definitely on the very same tier but at the bottom with the least longevity and 2nd worst average.
I'd argue even Snow has a fair case over Jimmy, let alone Roberts.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
You could argue, and your arguments can be wrong. If you unironically argue Snow>Anderson, I will honestly put it on the same tier as Greenidge>Weekes (@Thala_0710 will be happy)
I won't argue for that and I don't believe that but I find it funny how we are turning a guy nicknamed Clouderson into a complete Bowler and picking him over all condition potent bowlers when he wasn't rated this way throughout his career. I don't think Roberts>Anderson in 2020 or 21 would be controversial, same with Bedser.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
I won't argue for that and I don't believe that but I find it funny how we are turning a guy nicknamed Clouderson into a complete Bowler and picking him over all condition potent bowlers when he wasn't rated this way throughout his career. I don't think Roberts>Anderson in 2020 or 21 would be controversial, same with Bedser.
Bro I am not saying there's a big gap or anything but Jimmy has nearly thrice the wickets at 1 run higher average.
 

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
I won't argue for that and I don't believe that but I find it funny how we are turning a guy nicknamed Clouderson into a complete Bowler and picking him over all condition potent bowlers when he wasn't rated this way throughout his career. I don't think Roberts>Anderson in 2020 or 21 would be controversial, same with Bedser.
And in 2025, it's still not controversial (at least shouldn't be)
 

Top