• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Imran Khan vs Dale Steyn

Who was the greater fast bowler?

  • Imran Khan

    Votes: 12 21.8%
  • Dale Steyn

    Votes: 43 78.2%

  • Total voters
    55

subshakerz

Cricketer Of The Year
I know,I was just telling that if Imran retired in 1987 I would put him in top 3.
Yeah, if Imran retired around 87/88, this wouldnt be a debate, Imran would be a clear favorite and be a contender with Hadlee/Marshall. Those last few years where he was a proper bat and a part-time bowler took him down a notch. I still think he is better than Steyn though who was not as good as posters are making out to be.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
If Imran retired in 1987 then I would have rated him.After 1988-1989 till his retirement he was more like 4th or 5th bowler in his side.
Imran had an epic series in West Indies in 1988. It's from 1989 onwards that he wasn't bowling that much.
 

kyear2

International Captain
So going by the results of two recent polls, and taking into account Subshakerz's objections.

It appears that we believe that Steyn is better than Imran and McGrath is also slightly more highly rated than Hadlee.

But in a all time XI with Marshall and Warne, most wouldn't want Steyn and McGrath, preferring a more accomplished bat at no. 8. McGrath and Hadlee are too similar and while the bat deep crew would say Imran and Hadlee, they would be the ones who both came out 2nd best in the last two comps and personally wouldn't want all 3 bowlers from the same era.

So that leaves options (to me) of either.

Imran and McGrath

Or

Hadlee and Steyn

To accompany Marshall and Warne.

I lean towards the former, McGrath is my clear no. 2 overall and Imran the best bat of the 4 options, so best suited to 8, but also possibly the (slightly) worst bowler of the 4.

But Hadlee is seen by most to be just a hair below McGrath, while being the better bat, and Steyn is a better bowler than Imran and with Hadlee at 8 already the better bowler can be chosen.

So what do you guys think is the better combination of the two?

Was going to make this a thread, but think we've had enough comps of late.
 

subshakerz

Cricketer Of The Year
So going by the results of two recent polls, and taking into account Subshakerz's objections.

It appears that we believe that Steyn is better than Imran and McGrath is also slightly more highly rated than Hadlee.

But in a all time XI with Marshall and Warne, most wouldn't want Steyn and McGrath, preferring a more accomplished bat at no. 8. McGrath and Hadlee are too similar and while the bat deep crew would say Imran and Hadlee, they would be the ones who both came out 2nd best in the last two comps and personally wouldn't want all 3 bowlers from the same era.

So that leaves options (to me) of either.

Imran and McGrath

Or

Hadlee and Steyn

To accompany Marshall and Warne.

I lean towards the former, McGrath is my clear no. 2 overall and Imran the best bat of the 4 options, so best suited to 8, but also possibly the (slightly) worst bowler of the 4.

But Hadlee is seen by most to be just a hair below McGrath, while being the better bat, and Steyn is a better bowler than Imran and with Hadlee at 8 already the better bowler can be chosen.

So what do you guys think is the better combination of the two?

Was going to make this a thread, but think we've had enough comps of late.
If you pick Steyn, he will be unlikely to get the new ball ahead of Hadlee and Marshall which reduces his effectiveness.

Out of the two I would go with Imran and McGrath, given that you would have the no.1 and no.2 pacers ever taking the new ball in your attack and Imran who most of you agree is a better bat than Hadlee and better with the old ball than Steyn.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Assuming you have Bradman, Gilchrist, and Sobers, why not just pick the 4 pacers and Warne. Problem solved. Imran, Hadlee, Marshall, Warne, McGrath. Good luck figuring out the new ball pair.
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
In an all time side, the balance question is definitely different than if you were just picking individual vs individual. If you had batting lineup of say - Hobbs, Hutton, Bradman, Tendulkar, Sobers, Gilchrist all in their prime - it would be a fair question about why you would need anyone else that can even hold a bat. But I suppose you have to assume that this lineup will go up against a second all time XI or similar, which may have a bowling attack of any four of the following: Marshall, Lillee, McGrath, Ambrose, Imran, Warne, Murali, Akram, Steyn, Trueman, Barnes - all of them also in their primes. I think ANY four of those are potentially even scarier than the batitng line up and are certainly capable of causing a collapse in *any* all time XI, especially if the conditions were even slightly in their favor. So I still think you'd want to take batting into consideration and pick the guy who can bat more if the bowling was otherwise of a similar-ish level.
 

subshakerz

Cricketer Of The Year
In an all time side, the balance question is definitely different than if you were just picking individual vs individual. If you had batting lineup of say - Hobbs, Hutton, Bradman, Tendulkar, Sobers, Gilchrist all in their prime - it would be a fair question about why you would need anyone else that can even hold a bat. But I suppose you have to assume that this lineup will go up against a second all time XI or similar, which may have a bowling attack of any four of the following: Marshall, Lillee, McGrath, Ambrose, Imran, Warne, Murali, Akram, Steyn, Trueman, Barnes - all of them also in their primes. I think ANY four of those are potentially even scarier than the batitng line up and are certainly capable of causing a collapse in *any* all time XI, especially if the conditions were even slightly in their favor. So I still think you'd want to take batting into consideration and pick the guy who can bat more if the bowling was otherwise of a similar-ish level.
Yeah, this supports my theory that matches between ATGS will inevitably be low scoring affairs, since no batsman barring Bradman can be expected to withstand that kind of firepower for long unless its a flat pitch.

Which is why I am going for Imran, Hadlee, Marshall and Warne as my tail. The difference in bowling is minimal compared to the run value.
 

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
Yeah, this supports my theory that matches between ATGS will inevitably be low scoring affairs, since no batsman barring Bradman can be expected to withstand that kind of firepower for long unless its a flat pitch.

Which is why I am going for Imran, Hadlee, Marshall and Warne as my tail. The difference in bowling is minimal compared to the run value.
There will be no significant difference between Warne and Murali with the bat, if the opposing side is sporting 5 ATG bowlers. Infact the edge in bowling would matter more.
 

Top