Same in England TBHI'd bet that the majority of NZers won't even be able to tell you the winner of the tournament, even though we had coverage of basically every game live.
that was probably partially to do with channel 10 showing only a hnadful oft he matches live or the stupidity of showing a completed match when they could've shown the live match now and the completed one later.Same here in Aus where, incidentally, it was a flop for Channel 10.
Channel 10 would have been better served replaying the previous night's games in prime time ahead of Big Brother; it might not have been a roaring success but it would have rated better than that steaming pile.Same here in Aus where, incidentally, it was a flop for Channel 10.
They played all the matches, but none of which were live, they were all played at around midnight.that was probably partially to do with channel 10 showing only a hnadful oft he matches live or the stupidity of showing a completed match when they could've shown the live match now and the completed one later.
I read it rated higher than what 10 expected but obviously not enough to go head to head with prime time shows in peak ratings season. Lots of emails about a 1 hour highlights package which they're considering taking from S-Max as well.Same here in Aus where, incidentally, it was a flop for Channel 10.
Yes, I've spoken to a lot of people who aren't big cricket fans who would've watched it had it been on at a reasonable hour.Seriously, the timeslot as much as anything has a lot to do with it's failure to rate surely.