• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

favourite / least favourite cricket commentators

Ray Hadley

Cricket Spectator
Jones, you're conversing with someone whose stated place of residence is Adelaide, therefore it is little wonder that they have a limited vocabulary. South Australians are living proof that Tasmanians can swim.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Jones, you're conversing with someone whose stated place of residence is Adelaide, therefore it is little wonder that they have a limited vocabulary. South Australians are living proof that Tasmanians can swim.
Don't make me draw parallels between the intelligence of rugby league and those in Sydney who are fanatical about it.

I don't care what he says, omnierudite isn't a word. Erudite and INerudite (i.e. you clowns) are words. Omnierudite is lazy English, like using 'normalisation' to mean 'reduce something/someone to its normal state' (it's a mathematical term; I don't care how many social workers say otherwise).
 
TC,

It's okay to be WRONG, "omnierudite" is indeed a word and it comes directly from the Dictionary of Grandiloquence. Whether or not it's widely accepted by Oxford, Collins, Macquarie makes no difference. As Australia's Leading Social Commentator, I have signed off the official approval form. TC, one can be erudite yet in a narrow field pertaining to specialist knowledge. "Omni" steps it up a notch. So it's you wearing the clown pants sorry mate.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Rubbish; you are either erudite or inerudite. Omni implies occupying more than one state which is impossible with erudition. Logically, the Latin roots of erudition dictate that it's form cannot be in more than one state and that it refers to being 'learned' (its Latin form is the contradiction of 'untrained' or 'unlearned'). Ergo, it cannot refer to a specific or narrow field by definition. As I said, omnierudite is lazy English. Prove me wrong.

Damn, had a far more detailed post but the firewall killed it.
 
Top Cat,

The use of the word is open to interpretation so rubbish right back at ya. Erudite means showing knowledge or learning - that's Oxford mate as one example. You can be erudite in a specific field. Omni means all-encompassing so the old word from the Grandiloquence dictionary makes plenty of sense.

ERUDITION

(n.) The act of instructing; the result of thorough instruction; the state of being erudite or learned; the acquisitions gained by extensive reading or study; particularly, learning in literature or criticism, as distinct from the sciences; scholarship.

So as you can see the meaning has varied over the years and there is absolutely nothing wrong with me using OMNIERUDITE.

Erudite

Here's another angle:

Adjective. The adjective erudite, meaning "learned and well-instructed", comes from Latin eruditus. It stems from e-, ex-, meaning "out of, from" and rudis, meaning rough, untaught. (Rudis is the source of our English rude.) One who has been brought out of a rough, untaught, rude state is hence erudite.

So there you go. You're wrong.
 
TC,

English is a flawed, often silly language and it remains an evolving language. There is nothing "wrong" whatsoever about the way in which I have adapted "omnipresent". Definitions are not all clear cut so my superior adaptation should be respected as it is, and by none other than one of the world's most omnierudite leading social commentators ever, ME. Words take on different meanings over the years and you need to be of flexible mind to come to terms with this.
 

dinu23

International Debutant
Ray Hadley said:
Not stupid at all Richard, in fact I'd say judging by those figures John was spot on.Perhaps if you found some form of meaningful vocation you'd have a bit more to than post inane paranoid tripe on this site.
Jeese! leave him alone will ya! can't a guy post what he wants!
 
dinu23 said:
Jeese! leave him alone will ya! can't a guy post what he wants!
dinu23,
With all due respect, my esteemed colleague Ray Hadley makes a very valid point. In Australia (and im sure its the same in all parts of the world) people who sit around on the computer all day are branded as good for nothing bums. As my listeners know, I am absolutely scathing of these types of people. They contribute nothing to society. They just leech off the taxpayer all the time playing the system that has been so good to them as a fool. These people which i believe Richard is firmly a part of, need to get up and do something with themselves. In this more severe case, just getting up and leaving the house for ten minutes a day would be a good start.
Regards
John Laws CBE
 
Last edited:

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
John Laws CBE said:
These people which i believe Richard is firmly a part of
And you're wrong, because you know sod-all about it.
Because I can post quicker than most people and have more time on my hands than some, and need and desire less sleep than most, means you can easily make mistakes looking at my post-count.
And having made that mistake, of course, you're not going to admit it readily, and will continue to protest that you know far, far more than you do.
 

savill

School Boy/Girl Captain
I find some of Laws' comments quite amazing from someone who doesn't know Richard at all. How can you make quite personal remarks about someone you know F all about? I don't post that often on this forum, but I read alot of the threads etc. I may not agree with everything Richard say, but he never is one to get personal, like I believe you have. Can't you just stop with all this nonsense, and except the guys views, opinions etc.?
 

Belford

Banned
Lawsy is right

Lawsy is right. A high post count is the mark of the unemployable and/or the aimless drifter.

If you don't need to sleep, and you have more time on your hands than most, you should be helping out at the soup kitchen, or writing the first great novel of the 21st century, or learning Japanese, not haunting an internet forum making thousands of banal observations.

Your life is a gift to be seized with both hands, not trudged through, filling time in meaningless ways.
 

C_C

International Captain
Okkkk enough blabber about Richard...back to the subjectmatter at hand:

Favourite : Gavaskar, Harsha Bhogle, Michael Holding, Geoff Boycott, Richard Hadlee, Ian Bishop, Shane Warne(when he did a lil commentary during his ban), Tony Cozier and the english dude from the 70s...i forget his name.... lots of commentary from him on cricket collectables tapes.

Turns the volume off : Ritche Benaud, Nav Sidhu, Waqar Younis, Rameez Raja, Tony Becca, Bill Lawrey, Ian Healey, Dermott Reeve, Manjrekar, Wettimuny.

PS: Best commentator i ever heard - all sports/events inclusive- is one Murray Walker (those of you who follow F1 from here should know of him)....he is the master of all..bar none.
 

Somerset

Cricketer Of The Year
Favourites: Ian Smith, Mark Nicholas, Mark Taylor, Michael Slater's been interesting on this tour too, Channel 4's analysis man who's name doesn't come to mind...

Least Favourites: Waqar Younis, Gavin Larson, Bill Lawry, David Gower, Ian Botham.
 

Somerset

Cricketer Of The Year
C_C said:
PS: Best commentator i ever heard - all sports/events inclusive- is one Murray Walker (those of you who follow F1 from here should know of him)....he is the master of all..bar none.
This guy is great, really passionate about Formula One, really entertaining.

There's some fine football commentators as well. As far as anyone else is concerned, Keith Quinn will always be a favourite.
 

benchmark00

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Favourite: Richie (by a mile); Bil Lawry (funny because of his voice, if nothing else); Laxman Shivaranachristian (i know thats nowhere near his name but still, the Indian dude); Tony Greig; Mark Nicholas

Worst: Ian Smith, oh hell, the WHOLE NZ commentary team, theyre worst than Lawry when it comes to bias; Ian Botham (terribly biased also); Ian Healy; Ian Chappel (whinges constantly); Dean Jones and David Lloyds accent gets on my nerves at times (although i like what he has to say)
 

age_master

Hall of Fame Member
Like: Benaud, Heals, Holding, Waqar, Slats, Deano.

Dont: Mark nicholas is the worst, Tony, Bill, Chapell, the kiwi's.
 

Top