• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Dire Times Ahead For England

Richard

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
And an average, >1998, of 37 when batting in his best position.
Don't judge someone by a bad start if there has been improvement.
 
Richard

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
JohnnyA said:
by the time England face the Aussies again in 2007, they will still be a very distant second best, even without Warne, McGrath and Gillespie.
Click to expand...
Mr Mxyzptlk said:
Gillespie will be 32. Unless he has a very bad injury (not unlikely) I don't see why he wouldn't be Australia's primary bowler. For that matter, I think McGrath might still be around.
Click to expand...
Good spot on one count, Nostradamus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top