• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Dale Steyn vs Allan Donald vs Shaun Pollock

Who is the better bowler?


  • Total voters
    120

Jayro

U19 12th Man
If memory serves right he remained a 24 year old for a couple or more years.
Is Waqar's birthdate legitimate? If so, it's amazing how his peak came and went well before he'd turned 25. The '96 WC was the last he resembled the glory years but he was already in decline even then (and not 25 yet!).
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Yeah he is definitely older than Sachin, I think he even admitted it himself, his age as shown during his playing days was a good 3 years off his real one.
 

Kirkut

International Regular
Look at the 90s greats. Pick a period of x number of years that suits their peak and you can make a case for most of them being the best over a certain period.

Wasim may have been the best test bowler from 90-97 (idk, not checking). But that doesnt make him the best bowler of the whole 90s as you are saying... he is behind a few others when counting the whole of the decade. Not that I think the best of the decade means much, but at least it at least avoids cherrypicking.

And he wasnt the best for any meaningful period. 90-94, most of the period you are considering, he was a long way from the best bowler in his own team (not much of an indictement tbf, considering Waqar had arguably the best period ever for a quick, but he wasnt the only one).

And then there were better bowlers from 95-97 as well. Mcgraths most effective period, for example, way better in every statistically measurable way than Wasim
Donald and Ambrose ruled the 90s in tests. McGrath started to become the premier bowler from 1999 onwards.
 

Bolo.

International Vice-Captain
Donald and Ambrose ruled the 90s in tests. McGrath started to become the premier bowler from 1999 onwards.
Ya they were better bowlers in the 90s than him, or Wasim.

Im just picking an example from 95-97 who was ahead of Wasim.
 

Pup Clarke

Cricketer Of The Year
Another factor is who would you pay to watch? They're all world class. Sure, I'd personally pay good money to watch McGrath or Ambrose, but for someone like Wasim or Donald I'd pay much more to experience they're bowling. I thought Donald was the most exciting bowler I've ever seen live -terrifying and thrilling in equal measure
 
Last edited:

Top