chris.hinton
International Captain
Interesting, what are your thoughts?
From the Daily Telegrapth
From the Daily Telegrapth
County cricket is braced for the biggest shake-up in a generation amid fears that the 18 first-class sides could lose at least 20 per cent in their funding from the England & Wales Cricket Board.
As the financial fall-out from Covid-19 continues to escalate, counties are privately discussing a series of radical potential changes to the domestic game.
Areas understood to be up for discussion include:
The ECB are currently meeting with first-class counties to discuss the financial situation of each county, and the ECB themselves, which will inform discussions in the months ahead.
- Adopting a variant of the regional format of the Bob Willis Trophy as a replacement for the two division model of the County Championship which has been used since 2000
- Creating a new 32-team domestic 50-over competition involving a number of the national counties
- A reduction in the number of professional cricketers in the game and moving away from 12-month-a-year contracts for domestic players
- The long-term future of 18 counties playing the first-class game, and the possibility of some moving to just playing limited overs cricket in the years ahead
Each county currently receives around £3.5 million a year from the ECB, including the £1.3m a year they gain as part of the agreement to launch the Hundred. But the ECB is now consulting with counties over the future, and clubs are bracing themselves for a 20 per cent cut in their funding, which could see their annual provision from the ECB cut to around £2.8m.
“There are difficult decision ahead, which will force a review on what the game’s priorities are in the time of an existential threat,” said Richard Gould, the chief executive of Surrey.
To be ratified, any changes to the format of the domestic game would need the support of 12 of the 18 first-class counties.
Yet while financial pressures are a driving force behind the potential changes, there is a belief that the pandemic has provided the county game with an opportunity to reset.
“Everybody accepts that a review of what next season looks like is desired and all are happy to take part in that discussion,” said one county chief executive. “Certainly there is a willingness to not just go with the status quo.
“This is a great opportunity to seize the moment and build on what looked like a write off season two months ago.”
Five questions that will determine the future of county cricket
How many professional cricketers can English cricket afford?
On a conference call with county representatives earlier this month, the ECB chairman Colin Graves posed a simple question: can the English game afford 400 professional cricketers?
Over the years ahead, the number is certain to be reduced. Dozens of the 136 professional cricketers out of contract at the end of the season will lose their jobs. With reducing total number of employees - both on and off the field - the easiest way for counties to cut costs, there will be smaller squads in England in the years ahead.
A more flexible employment model is also possible. Counties are discussing whether it is really necessary for all their players to be on 12-month-a-year contracts, or if these could be reduced to, say, eight months a year with players making up the shortfall by seeking out playing and coaching opportunities overseas.
What does the future of first-class cricket look like?
Two divisions have been used in the County Championship since 2000, a period that has coincided with a striking uplift in England’s Test fortunes. From 1980-2000, England won 5.6 Tests for every 10 they lost; since 2000, England have won 14 Tests for every 10 they have lost.
There is broad acceptance that two divisions in the County Championship have worked well. Yet the Bob Willis Trophy - played in three regional groups of six, with a Lord’s final - has also given a glimpse of another model. The regional model also involves significantly less travel - with some away teams even able to commute from home for away games - and so is cheaper.
While spectators have not been able to attend, viewing figures for the online streams that counties have used - a number have invested in extra cameras to previous seasons - have far exceeded expectations. Surrey’s home game with Middlesex attracted 764,000 views over four days - 66 times more than one Surrey County Championship home game in August last year, which attracted 11,500 views over four days.
For all the unique circumstances of this summer, so far the Bob Willis Trophy has informed the thinking of county decision-makers in several ways. First, it has shown the virtues of a competition in which all 18 counties can win, with second division counties appearing reinvigorated. Second - from an admittedly small sample size - it has suggested that the on-field gap between divisions may be less than thought: second division sides Derbyshire, Leicestershire and Middlesex have all begun impressively.
“It would be really good for the game if one of the second division teams manages to make it to the final,” says one county chief executive. “If that does happen it’s bound to cause some debate about what should we do next year.”
A simple model would be for the format of the Bob Willis Trophy to be modified, with each team playing the others in their group home and away before the season ends with semi-finals and a final - both played over five days to maximise the prospects of a result. This would guarantee each county 10 first-class games, from the current 14. This could potentially be expanded to, say, 12, with each county playing two games against sides from different regions, using a seeding system.
Will there continue to be 18 first-class counties?
Financial pressures have reopened the debate about whether 18 counties should continue to play first-class cricket. The reception to the Bob Willis Trophy - and the performances from less heralded counties - means that, at this stage, there is little doubt that there will be 18 first-class counties next summer. But whether there will still be 18 sides playing County Championship cricket in, say, 2025 remains a very real question.
Any county that declared they no longer wished to play the first-class game would feel their status downgraded. But it is possible that this perception could change if, say, any county making this decision was guaranteed long-term involvement in the Twenty20 Blast and Royal London One-Day Cup and retained a good chunk of their funding. Such a model could become attractive to some counties, who would retain their lucrative fixtures and cut their costs; it would be cheaper for the ECB, too.
“All want to play first-class cricket,” says one county chief executive. “Whether they can afford to is another matter.”
What is the future of domestic 50-over cricket?
The original fixture list for 2020 featured the Royal London One-Day Cup, the domestic 50-over competition, being played alongside the Hundred. It was planned that the 18 first-class counties would compete against each other in two groups of nine, while missing their players selected for the Hundred draft - a full 11 players, in Sussex’s case.
Rather than a competition that could find it difficult to shake the feel of being a glorified county second XI competition, there is a desire to create a tournament with a fresher and more dynamic feel. The tournament is seen as a way to engage parts of the country who have previously been ignored by the first-class game.
National countries (previously called minor counties) played against first-class sides in one-day cricket from 1964 until 2005, before being excluded when the county game was restructured. Now, serious thought is being given to allow national counties to compete in the same competition as first-class counties once again.
Preliminary proposals for the future of the Royal London One-Day Cup are understood to involve 32 teams in four groups of eight, with leading teams then progressing to the knockout stages. Alongside the 18 first-class counties, there would be a number of national counties and potentially also representative teams from Ireland, Scotland and the Netherlands, who were all previously involved in the county game.
The intention is to use the One-Day Cup to make domestic cricket a prominent local event in areas that do not currently host first-class teams, by pitting national counties against local first-class teams - for instance, Cornwall could host Somerset and Cumbria could host Lancashire. Such a competition would create the possibility of upset victories and could be billed as cricket’s version of the FA Cup. It might also unearth new talent previously ignored by the first-class game.
And what about the Hundred?
Ian Watmore, who will take over from Colin Graves as ECB chairman next month, plans to review all of the governing body’s expenditure, and spending on the controversial Hundred - the new eight-team, 100-ball-a-side tournament - will not be exempt. But there is a broad feeling that Covid only makes one of the central aims of the Hundred - to reduce the ECB’s reliance upon international cricket to generate revenue - more important. Aspects of spending on the Hundred - like player salaries, reduced by 20 per cent for 2021 - will be trimmed. But there is absolutely no indication of the Hundred being scrapped before it is launched.
