Chris Schofield on the dole!

[sledger]

No, it's none. I've never even seen a picture of him. I don't need to. I know one simple fact: he's a fingerspinner and he's playing in Australia.
That'll do.

im a finger spinner playing in australia, by no means am i amazing

i back marc in this instance, richrad your theory is preposterous

 

[chris.hinton]

No, only the ones you overhype when they have nothing to back it up (Kadeer anyone?)

Kadeer will come good you will see sadly it will be for Glouester, i know a lot more then you Marc " the Armchair Supporter" so back my Judgement


and i see Rikki Clarke doing well, what are you thoughts on that?

 

[marc71178]

Kadeer is averaging 20 in County Cricket - yet you saying he's good is knowing more than me - OK.

As for Clarke, he's had all of 1 good innings - hardly a weight of runs is it?

 

[kendall]

and i see Rikki Clarke doing well, what are you thoughts on that?[/QUOTE]

rikki clarke will never be a good international cricketer

 

[Neil Pickup]

Kadeer will come good you will see sadly it will be for Glouester, i know a lot more then you Marc " the Armchair Supporter" so back my Judgement


and i see Rikki Clarke doing well, what are you thoughts on that?

Unfortunately Chris, there's not been a single piece of evidence behind any of your proclamations over the past three years that have even remotely suggested that your judgement is worth backing. Unlike certain other forum members...

 

[Richard]

im a finger spinner playing in australia, by no means am i amazing

i back marc in this instance, richrad your theory is preposterous

You are playing at the top level?
I don't believe you.

 

[Richard]

In spite of never seeing him, and regardless of his very good first season, you're writing him off because of a theory.

How is that judging him on the field?

His very good first season which amounted to all of... 3 games.
And his 2nd season was much more extensive and in it he averaged 29.89. Not to mention the shockingly poor one-day average, but that's nothing new in a young English player, of course...

 

[marc71178]

His very good first season which amounted to all of... 3 games.
And his 2nd season was much more extensive and in it he averaged 29.89. Not to mention the shockingly poor one-day average, but that's nothing new in a young English player, of course...

Erm last I heard Cullen wasn't English?

 

[Richard]

No, you know perfectly well that I was referring to Ali Cook.
And yes, in spite of Cullen having a good debut season, I write him off, because one-off seasons are not uncommon - fingerspinners having success in Australia is.

 

[marc71178]

No, you know perfectly well that I was referring to Ali Cook.

I do?

Why reply to a comment about Cullen then?

 

[sledger]

You are playing at the top level?
I don't believe you.

its besides the point, lets say hypothetically that i am

 

[sledger]

and i see Rikki Clarke doing well, what are you thoughts on that?

rikki clarke will never be a good international cricketer[/QUOTE]

rikki clarke will never be a good cricketer full stop, he is very poor....

 

[chris.hinton]

I rate rikki clarke because neil and marc dont

 

[sledger]

I rate rikki clarke because neil and marc dont

lol thats fair enough, but realistically he is very poor player, ok for surrey, terrible for england. doubt he will ever play in an ODI again, bar something terrible happening to the rest of the squad.

 

[marc71178]

I rate rikki clarke because neil and marc dont

What a good reason!

Although history would say that you're wrong to go against the pair of us.

 

[Neil Pickup]

I rate rikki clarke because neil and marc dont

Having spent the last year and a half slagging him off, you decide to rate him based on that?

Now I see why your opinions are so always well-researched and accurate.

 

[Richard]

its besides the point, lets say hypothetically that i am

Totally pointless hypothesis, it's different if you're not playing at the top level.

 

[Richard]

I do?

It was pretty darn obvious.

Why reply to a comment about Cullen then?

Got threads mixed-up.

 

[Richard]

What a good reason!

Although history would say that you're wrong to go against the pair of us.

Like Harmison, for instance...

 

[sledger]

Totally pointless hypothesis, it's different if you're not playing at the top level.

completely pointless post, idiot