• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best Test opener of the 21st Century?

Out of this quartet of prolific openers, who was the best?


  • Total voters
    59

subshakerz

International Coach
First of all I don't think home performances should necessarily count for more than away, but they shouldn't count for less. Murali is a poor example because he has other factors affecting his average, like taking 25% of his wickets against Zimbabwe & Bangaldesh at an average of 12. It's not just home dominance.

Jadeja or Anderson are better examples, 2 guys who are chronically underrated because their home performances are seen as "not counting". Though Anderson seems to be starting to get appreciated more lately
I think if home conditions massively suit your style of play then of course it will be seen as less of a test to perform there than away. You will be expected to perform there. So once you achieve a benchmark of quality at home, any surplus doesn't add to your standing as a cricketer. Anderson can take 500 wickets in England and it won't move his rating. Kumble perhaps won more games for his country than Warne, but because they were home wins on specific pitches, it doesn't really bring him closer to being a better spinner.

And if you can't reproduce those results in away conditions then your home performances are seen in a different light. It actually works against you because it exposes your limitation.

Jadeja and Anderson aren't underrated. They are rated exactly as they should be IMO, just like Vernon Philander who was even better than Steyn at home.

David Warner is the best Aussie batsmen since Bradman at home, nobody cares though.

Performing away from home is how a cricketer establishes themselves as world-class, with some exceptions if your home conditions are more difficult for your style of play. That doesn't mean you ignore home performances but they don't build a case for someone to be top tier.
 
Last edited:

Raz0r6ack

U19 12th Man
But home average has a reliable sample size. Away averages, per country don't. Home average is a good indicator of how you might be if you played away a lot lot more.
Exactly. For sample size Hayden played 10 away Tests in South Africa, Smith played 10 away Tests in Australia.

G. Smith was averaging 57 after 10 Tests played at home in South Africa. Ended up averaging 42 at home after 61 Tests.

Hayden was averaging 41 after 10 Tests played at home in Australia. Ended up averaging 58 at home after 56 Tests.
 

Top