The Storm rocked. Before they folded. Then the Manchester Phoenix rocked. Then they folded too. Haven't been to see them since they reformed. It's only a matter of time before they fold again.Jungle Jumbo said:Went to see the old Manchester Storm play ice hockey once or twice, which was exciting but perhaps a little too self-centred on punch-ups.
What are they called now. IIRC they were just full of poor-quality US and Canadian players.steds said:The Storm rocked. Before they folded. Then the Manchester Phoenix rocked. Then they folded too. Haven't been to see them since they reformed. It's only a matter of time before they fold again.
Phoenix still. And yes they were. In later days they had a few (about 7?) Brits, though, iirc. In the last game I went to, the opponents (Sheffield) only had 1.Jungle Jumbo said:What are they called now. IIRC they were just full of poor-quality US and Canadian players.
The fact that you said that you coud have the ball anywhere it doesn't matter because you will put it up in 2 secs anyway. You know there is a such thing called defense, which makes scoring a bucket really tough, even though scores are in the low 100s. Also 3 pointers are somewhat like goals because they don't come often either.Jungle Jumbo said:I can watch baseball quite happily, intriguing sport. NFL is good on Sunday evenings as well, even though I haven't got a clue what is happening. Went to see the old Manchester Storm play ice hockey once or twice, which was exciting but perhaps a little too centred on punch-ups.
The NBA, on the other hand, does my head in. Yes, I can appreciate the high level of skill involved, which is amazing to watch at times, but I just can't see the attraction of it. Since most games involve hundreds of points being scored, there is little excitement scored by a basket as there is a goal in football or a try in rugby or a home run in baseball. The lack of any obvious tactical element also enerves me, as does the fact that territory on the court means absolutely nothing. Unlike virtually every other 'goal' sport in the world (there's probably a technical name), it doesn't matter where the ball is on the pitch as long as you have possession, since you can have the ball under the hoop at the other end in a few seconds.
End of rant.
So how come most attacks ('offenses' if you must) end in a basket being scored. That seems to indicate that missing is more important than scoring. Three pointers may be rare, but you can't compare them to goals in that sense because you can rack up another three points through one-pointers relatively easily. As I said before, I can understand the immense skill involved in the sport, but not the attraction of it.Dravid said:The fact that you said that you coud have the ball anywhere it doesn't matter because you will put it up in 2 secs anyway. You know there is a such thing called defense, which makes scoring a bucket really tough, even though scores are in the low 100s. Also 3 pointers are somewhat like goals because they don't come often either.
If you really want to know how hard it is to score a bucket against the defense, watch the Detroit Pistons play when it's their night. In the top 3 defensive teams in the league, and they always win games because of their defense, not their offense.
I tend to agree with you there: it becomes to hard to follow, and games take on less importance. Surely one home and one away game against each franchise should be enough? I suppose it's a different culuture though and it rakes in loads more cash._Ed_ said:I went NFL.
I love football and baseball, but I just find that there are too many games in the MLB for me to be interested. Does every team really need to play 162 times a year? Seems a bit excessive IMO.
Get really interested when it gets to the post-season though.
Haha, wtf are you serious? Most attempts end up scoring? Sorry to say thats the dumbest thing I have heard in a while.Jungle Jumbo said:So how come most attacks ('offenses' if you must) end in a basket being scored. That seems to indicate that missing is more important than scoring. Three pointers may be rare, but you can't compare them to goals in that sense because you can rack up another three points through one-pointers relatively easily. As I said before, I can understand the immense skill involved in the sport, but not the attraction of it.
Also, since it seems to you that offense scores almost every possesion, then whats the difference between Cricket and Basketball. You have runs coming like crazy in Cricket.Jungle Jumbo said:So how come most attacks ('offenses' if you must) end in a basket being scored. That seems to indicate that missing is more important than scoring. Three pointers may be rare, but you can't compare them to goals in that sense because you can rack up another three points through one-pointers relatively easily. As I said before, I can understand the immense skill involved in the sport, but not the attraction of it.