• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Benaud vs Kapil vs Jadeja

Better all rounder in Tests?


  • Total voters
    22

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
How the hell the counts as an allrounder skillset?
It might for some people. Interesting when looking at the allrounder page on Wikipedia it said Ali Bacher had some statistical thing in 2013 and claimed there had only been 42 genuine allrounders in cricket history. (he ranked Sobers as the greatest, followed by Kallis) However following sources and further searching hasn’t led me to the entire list. Quite curious about the other 40. I believe it was touched on in his book Jacques Kallis and 12 other Great South African Allrounders.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
It might for some people. Interesting when looking at the allrounder page on Wikipedia it said Ali Bacher had some statistical thing in 2013 and claimed there had only been 42 genuine allrounders in cricket history. (he ranked Sobers as the greatest, followed by Kallis) However following sources and further searching hasn’t led me to the entire list. Quite curious about the other 40. I believe it was touched on in his book Jacques Kallis and 12 other Great South African Allrounders.
That part of the book (not sure if the entirety was) available for free online and I read quite a bit of it. He began with describing that "a true all-rounder" is someone who averages over 40 with the bat and below 30 with the ball, 1 WPM minimum. But with minimum 20 Tests, no one but Aubrey Faulkner (and Eddie Barlow on including the RoW vs ENG Series which originally had Test status) made the cut. So he reduced it to 25 batting and 35 bowling. Well, as a result, Benaud didn't made the cut but Stuart Broad did.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
That part of the book (not sure if the entirety was) available for free online and I read quite a bit of it. He began with describing that "a true all-rounder" is someone who averages over 40 with the bat and below 30 with the ball, 1 WPM minimum. But with minimum 20 Tests, no one but Aubrey Faulkner (and Eddie Barlow on including the RoW vs ENG Series which originally had Test status) made the cut. So he reduced it to 25 batting and 35 bowling. Well, as a result, Benaud didn't made the cut but Stuart Broad did.
Very generous for it to be described as a statistical analysis imo.
 

capt_Luffy

Hall of Fame Member
Very generous for it to be described as a statistical analysis imo.
He ran an SQL query in a statsguru database.

Matches Played: from 20
Batting Average: from 25
Bowling Average: To 35

And just then add the 1 WPM cut-off.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
He ran an SQL query in a statsguru database.

Matches Played: from 20
Batting Average: from 25
Bowling Average: To 35

And just then add the 1 WPM cut-off.
FTR Beau Webster

6 matches 367 @ 40.77, 6 wickets @ 26.00, 10 catches
 

sayon basak

Cricketer Of The Year
That part of the book (not sure if the entirety was) available for free online and I read quite a bit of it. He began with describing that "a true all-rounder" is someone who averages over 40 with the bat and below 30 with the ball, 1 WPM minimum. But with minimum 20 Tests, no one but Aubrey Faulkner (and Eddie Barlow on including the RoW vs ENG Series which originally had Test status) made the cut. So he reduced it to 25 batting and 35 bowling. Well, as a result, Benaud didn't made the cut but Stuart Broad did.
ATG definition.
 

Top