• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Archived [18/10/06] : Battrick

Status
Not open for further replies.

Robertinho

Cricketer Of The Year
Robertinho said:
Batting: 50 (+2)
Bowling: 33 (+3)
Fielding: 41 (+7)
Secondaries: 76 (-11)
Stamina: 49 (+5)
Overall: 249 (+6)

Pretty shocked that batting and bowling haven't gone up more, and surprised secondaries have gone down so much. Ah well.
Batting: 55 (+5)
Bowling: 35 (+2)
Fielding: 39 (-2)
Secondaries: 90 (+14)
Stamina: 50 (+1)
Overall: 269 (+20)

Pretty happy with that, increase across the board (apart from fielding - meh). I'm also happy with the batting because I have 7 batsmen and 4 worthless bats, so it's essentially 51 from only 7 guys. Pleased with the secondary increase :)
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Hey guys whats more imporant primary rating or secondary ratings. In the last two weeks three of my players have popped, but all three have low secondary, so i don't know whether to bat them higher then guys with slightly weaker primary but better secondarys.

Here are my batsmen:
F Ajizal, res/woe (Bat)
D Senior, res/wor (Bat)
D Cayton, res/wor (Bat)
A Da Silva, com/fee (Bat)
A Hodge, com/fee (Bat)
D Mitten, com/wor (Bat)
H Haasim, med/fee (Bat)
T Girubaharan, med/fee (Bat)

Here are my bowlers:
S Pushpakumara, res/fee (Bowl-RF)
I Rangana, res/woe (Bowl-LM)
B O'Neill, res/wor (Bowl-S)
K Priyantha, com/com (Bat-LF)
H Luxman, com/fee (Bowl-RM)
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Scaly piscine 13/01/06 said:
Here's my team in squad order, the bits you can pretty much work out anyway - the primaries:

Code:
[b]Player[/b]    [b]Age[/b]  [b]BTR[/b] [b]Batting[/b]     [b]Bowling[/b]      [b]WK[/b]
Shields   24  6205 respectable
Packer    21 12975 proficient
Dillon    18 12661 respectable mediocre
Armstrong 18 19937 competent                competent
Weaver    20  4430 respectable
Maxwell   22  3786 respectable competent
Callery   19  4414 mediocre
Cooper    29  3731 feeble      competent
Cahalane  19  8410 woeful      respectable
Street    23  5700 abysmal     competent
Howlett   19  8320 abysmal     competent
Team now
Code:
[b]Player[/b]    [b]Age[/b]  [b]BTR[/b] [b]Batting[/b]     [b]Bowling[/b]      [b]WK[/b]
Armstrong 18 36256 respectable              respectable
Packer    21 14718 proficient
Dillon    18 30270 proficient  competent
Weaver    20  4499 respectable
Shields   24  7695 respectable
Callery   19  5574 mediocre
Walsh     27  4109 mediocre
Mohamed   26  6505 mediocre    proficient
Pace      19 11069 feeble      strong
Cahalane  19 10008 woeful      proficient
Howlett   19  8983 abysmal     competent


Scaly piscine 13/12/05 said:
Batting 55
Bowling 32
Fielding 43
Secondaries 102
Stamina 45
Now:

Batting 61
Bowling 37
Fielding 59
Secondaries 117
Stamina 52
 

thewizard1o1

International Debutant
one pop this week...andy you were on the money (all though i still only gave him 1 batting net :D)

Nick Saint - 17 yo, BT Rating=13,447
RH Batsman, RM Bowler, strong batting form, respectable bowling form, drained
An attacking player with competent leadership skills and worthless experience.
Stamina: woeful Wicket Keeping: woeful
Batting: respectable Concentration: competent
Bowling: strong Consistency: mediocre
Fielding: woeful
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
chaminda_00 said:
Hey guys whats more imporant primary rating or secondary ratings. In the last two weeks three of my players have popped, but all three have low secondary, so i don't know whether to bat them higher then guys with slightly weaker primary but better secondarys.

Here are my batsmen:
F Ajizal, res/woe (Bat)
D Senior, res/wor (Bat)
D Cayton, res/wor (Bat)
A Da Silva, com/fee (Bat)
A Hodge, com/fee (Bat)
D Mitten, com/wor (Bat)
H Haasim, med/fee (Bat)
T Girubaharan, med/fee (Bat)

Here are my bowlers:
S Pushpakumara, res/fee (Bowl-RF)
I Rangana, res/woe (Bowl-LM)
B O'Neill, res/wor (Bowl-S)
K Priyantha, com/com (Bat-LF)
H Luxman, com/fee (Bowl-RM)
IMO, the guys with high secondaries should bat high (since they usually last longer at the crease). So I'd go Ajizal, Da Silva, Hodge, Senior, Cayton, wickie, A/R, four bowlers. As for bowling, I'd rate them Priyantha = Pushpakumara > Rangana > O'Neill = Luxman.
 

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
Depends on stamina as well, I wouldn't use anyone with less than feeble stamina as a regular top three batsman (feeble as an absolute minimum). Anything less than that and they'll just stop scoring once they hit 50 or 75.
 

ash chaulk

International Captain
ash chaulk the old said:
Viveash

Batting - 57
Bowling - 34
Fielding - 46
Secondaries - 109
Stamina - 53
the new

Viveash
Batting - 66 (+9)
Bowling - 40 (+6)
Fielding - 53 (+7)
Secondaries - 161 (+52)
Stamina - 65 (+12)
 

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
Pretty crappy training session, Cuss popped in fielding and concentration in his first week on a fielding net, but no other pops. Seems this training bug has decided to pass me by.
 

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
Bardle's popped in bowling twice in one month (on 2 nets)

Gareth Bardle - 17 yo, BT Rating=11,136
RH Batsman, RFM Bowler, strong batting form, strong bowling form, lively
A cautious player with woeful leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: feeble Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: worthless Concentration: woeful
Bowling: strong Consistency: competent
Fielding: respectable

Popped to strong (17 y/o strong, how awesome is that) as well as getting competent consistency

Aldred:

Maurice Aldred - 19 yo, BT Rating=9,126
RH Batsman, RFM Bowler, respectable batting form, superb bowling form, fair
An attacking player with woeful leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: mediocre Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: proficient Concentration: competent
Bowling: competent Consistency: mediocre
Fielding: abysmal

I reckon that I can cut his batting net now that he's popped(he's now actually my best batsman)

Full update later.
 
Last edited:

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
Argh this bug really ****es me off. It was bad enough that people were getting pops in three weeks last week, but some people have had the same players pop again this week - so effectively they've been given 20+ weeks of training in the space of two. I'm hoping it's only a display error that can easily be rectified (even then there will be the problem of people buying/selling players on the basis of an early pop) - but if it's not, and it isn't rectified, then it's basically going to punish everyone who hasn't been stacking multiple nets on a few players.
 

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
Bardle's truly gone mad

27th Feb:

Gareth Bardle - 17 yo, BT Rating=5,702
RH Batsman, RFM Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, sublime
A cautious player with woeful leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: woeful Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: worthless Concentration: woeful
Bowling: respectable Consistency: feeble
Fielding: mediocre

27th March:

Gareth Bardle - 17 yo, BT Rating=11,136
RH Batsman, RFM Bowler, strong batting form, strong bowling form, lively
A cautious player with woeful leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: feeble Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: worthless Concentration: woeful
Bowling: strong Consistency: competent
Fielding: respectable

So, if Bardle does the same in the next month
He'll look like this:

Gareth Bardle - 17 yo, BT Rating= 16,570
RH Batsman, RFM Bowler, ???? batting form, ????? bowling form, ??????
A cautious player with woeful leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: mediocre Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: worthless Concentration: woeful
Bowling: quality Consistency: proficient
Fielding: strong

Can anyone say gun? :D
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Adamc said:
Argh this bug really ****es me off. It was bad enough that people were getting pops in three weeks last week, but some people have had the same players pop again this week - so effectively they've been given 20+ weeks of training in the space of two. I'm hoping it's only a display error that can easily be rectified (even then there will be the problem of people buying/selling players on the basis of an early pop) - but if it's not, and it isn't rectified, then it's basically going to punish everyone who hasn't been stacking multiple nets on a few players.
Yep, yet again the better managers get screwed over. I've been shafted by all the bad stuff like morale/fitness resets and sponsor levels (or whatever) getting stuck, I get shafted over every YP bar one and now I get shafted by this because I'm smart enough to not duplicate net overkill.

I'll be somewhat surprised if the results of this training bug get undone.
 

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
Scaly piscine said:
Yep, yet again the better managers get screwed over. I've been shafted by all the bad stuff like morale/fitness resets and sponsor levels (or whatever) getting stuck, I get shafted over every YP bar one and now I get shafted by this because I'm smart enough to not duplicate net overkill.

I'll be somewhat surprised if the results of this training bug get undone.
This training bug is the best thing since AA :ph34r:
 

cricketboy29

International Regular
Im Definitely with you there, jamee, 100%, Thanks to it, Ive got a 17 year old strong bat, and 17 year old destructive prof. spinner,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top