nz have the best odi team in the world, at worst joint first with india. england make it a three way if the pitch is a joke and jofra feels like bowling heat.yeah, the NZ test side is pretty class at least outside of SC conditions but somehow I do not get the same impression about their ODI and especially, their T20I sides. Of course, in KO games it is just a question of having a better night than the opponents and the toss will once again be super crucial and semi decisive. So no reason they cant win this thing, but I still think they are more of a flawed T20 side esp. in these conditions compared to Pak and England and maybe even Aus and SA.
Even you should be able to realize cricket, especially LO cricket, is extremely conditions reliant and driven at this point. There are no honest certainties IMO. And shorter the tournament, the more unpredictable it can be. Two good days or two bad days can make or break sides here. I wont be surprised if Aus went on to win this one, for example, but it wont make them the best T20I side in the world across conditions or anything. In a way, its very good that it is such an unpredictable era between the top 3-6 sides.nz have the best odi team in the world, at worst joint first with india. england make it a three way if the pitch is a joke and jofra feels like bowling heat.
you're arguing with me over something i never postedEven you should be able to realize cricket, especially LO cricket, is extremely conditions reliant and driven at this point. There are no honest certainties IMO. And shorter the tournament, the more unpredictable it can be. Two good days or two bad days can make or break sides here. I wont be surprised if Aus went on to win this one, for example, but it wont make them the best T20I side in the world across conditions or anything. In a way, its very good that it is such an unpredictable era between the top 3-6 sides.
Really? Personally don't think England are all that - they rely so much on Buttler. Also can never remember England playing Sodhi/Santner very well and they're not great against spin collectively imo. A very good one-dimensional side, but one-dimensional they are.Just don't feel like we have the extra gear to beat England.
A lot of guys striking at just over 100, or just not in that great nick. The bowling unit is red hot, but we really need to keep England to <140 to feel like we're a good chance.
Just feel like they have more guys who can go at 150SR, and with a bit of quality about them. You're 100% right - they are a one-dimensional side and they rely heavily on Buttler, and lesser extent Malan. We're relying on Guptill, which hasn't always been the greatest omen when we're not playing at Eden Park. Their back-up list (Roy, Livingstone, Moeen, Morgan, Bairstow) is better than ours, too.Really? Personally don't think England are all that - they rely so much on Buttler. Also can never remember England playing Sodhi/Santner very well and they're not great against spin collectively imo. A very good one-dimensional side, but one-dimensional they are.
NZ can definitely take this
Hmmm.That last over looked weird AF. Not saying Rashid did that on purpose, but it looked very odd in the replays. Rashid was having a brain-freeze or something I guess.
Happy 30th Burgey!Rashid Khan is 23 in the same way I am celebrating my 30th this week