Get it please.
Get it please.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"Hope is the fuel of progress and fear is the prison in which you put yourself" - Tony Benn
#408. Sixty three not out forever.
Brad McNamara @bbuzzmc
Will say this once and then nothing else. Defamation laws quite clear in Aus.be careful.
Yeah, can think of a number of threads that would have benefited from this over the years. And some that would benefit from it at present.
What the eff is cockblocking? I mean, I know what it means IRL, but as CW isn't a dating site (or if it is I've been sorely mistaken for some little time) it can't be that...
Cricket Web's current Premier League Tipping Champion
- As featured in The Independent.
"I don't think that they'll come close to us to be honest."
- Steve Smith before the Ashes
It's where a poster is prevented from accessing a thread. Cribb did it to me for a while to the suggestions for the forum thread in cricsim (he disliked my suggestions ), if you click on the thread you get a message telling you that you don't have access to it.
Definitely a useful alternative to locking threads where one or two posters are stirring ****, but at the same time it could lead to some, um, interesting reactions if employed here.
I'm all for it mind.
Originally Posted by John King
RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
Right. Ta for that.
IIRC we're waiting for an upgrade before such things can be implemented?
But I'm pro, certainly. Banning certain posters from the footy thread is where I'd start.
Yeah I hate it when I'm trying to flirt with a few posters and a couple of the other blokes ruin my chances by just relating everything back to Cricket. We get it you like cricket.
So Burgey wants to ban himself from lots of threads?
I agree with this. I can think of a fair few posters who should not be allowed to access certain threads.
Replying to a thread with nothing more than a to get you cockblocked IMO.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)