Cricket Player Manager
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Selective Ignoring or Banning

  1. #1
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Wishing Phil Hughes all the best
    Posts
    45,335

    Selective Ignoring or Banning

    It's occurred to me that some otherwise perfectly decent posters do talk absolute pigswill about certain topics ad nauseam. This is probably completely impractical, but is there any way that when they could be banned from further comment on the subject or maybe have the post checked by a mod before they post about it? I won't name names, but if any poster's hobbyhorses spring to mind then you're probably thinking along the same lines as me.

    Is there a way of maybe having certain words or phrases trigger a warning email to mods or invoking the ignore function?
    Cricket Web's 2013/14 Premier League Tipping Champion

    - As featured in The Independent.

    "I don't believe a word of Pietersen's book, but then I don't believe a word anyone else has said either."
    - Simon Barnes renders further comment on KP's autobiography superfluous in a sentence

  2. #2
    International 12th Man weeman27bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,725
    Standardised averages.

  3. #3
    Global Moderator Fusion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,563
    IMHO, it would be impractical to do this. First, I think it will be pretty easy to get around certain words that may trigger a mod review. Second, I would be very uneasy with the censorship aspect of it. If a member is not breaking the forum rules, then I wouldn't want to prevent them from discussing a topic. If they are trolling by discussing said topic, then someone will report them and they'll be infracted.

    Sadly I think the best recourse people have in this situation is to put the member on ignore, or skip the posts that you find "annoying".

  4. #4
    Englishman BoyBrumby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Wishing Phil Hughes all the best
    Posts
    45,335
    Quote Originally Posted by Fusion View Post
    IMHO, it would be impractical to do this. First, I think it will be pretty easy to get around certain words that may trigger a mod review. Second, I would be very uneasy with the censorship aspect of it. If a member is not breaking the forum rules, then I wouldn't want to prevent them from discussing a topic. If they are trolling by discussing said topic, then someone will report them and they'll be infracted.

    Sadly I think the best recourse people have in this situation is to put the member on ignore, or skip the posts that you find "annoying".
    Guessed it was a no go. Thanks for answering, anyway.

    The thing is some posters are really good when they're kept away from their bete noires so I'm loath to have them on a blanket ignore as I have with others.


  5. #5
    Spanish_Vicente sledger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Refreshingly Unconcerned With The Vulgar Exigencies Of Veracity
    Posts
    32,467
    What about blocking people from certain threads after a spate of irksome behaviour? Pretty sure that's feasible, technically at least.

  6. #6
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    49,104
    Happens on cricsim anyway. Doesn't really fit the CW culture I'd have thought.

    For the record, ever since I took on the mammoth task of reading the Ashes 05 thread about six years ago, I've thought it would be useful to have a thread ignore option. As Brumby himself would say, no names no pack drill etc etc
    Quote Originally Posted by DingDong View Post
    gimh has now surpassed richard as the greatest cw member ever imo

    RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.

  7. #7
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    44,041
    Quote Originally Posted by sledger View Post
    What about blocking people from certain threads after a spate of irksome behaviour? Pretty sure that's feasible, technically at least.
    We'd have to install a plugin to do that and as has been pointed out before, James doesn't want to install any more plugins until he upgrades the forum to vB4. They make it a lot harder to complete upgrades in general.

    I'm also not convinced it'd work very well here anyway, especially considering how our moderation decisions are actually made. We discuss all decisions as a moderation group before taking action, and if it took two days to remove someone from a thread it'd be a bit pointless. It works better on forums where the moderators have individual autonomy and the members don't demand the respect and fairness that they do here. It's an "unruly child" type punishment really, and I think it'd cause more harm than it'd be worth here.
    ~ Cribbertarian ~

    Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09

    Quote Originally Posted by John Singleton
    Recognition of Property Rights in material objects is the recognition of a manís right to exist; his right to pursue his own goals in his own manner at his own discretion with what is rightfully his to command. Just as the Right to Life is the right to the property of oneís own person, so the right to own material products is the right to sustain oneís life and to keep the results of oneís own efforts.


  8. #8
    Spanish_Vicente sledger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Refreshingly Unconcerned With The Vulgar Exigencies Of Veracity
    Posts
    32,467
    I imagine the existence of such a feature would probably result in me being debarred from CC as well.

  9. #9
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    44,041
    Quote Originally Posted by sledger View Post
    I imagine the existence of such a feature would probably result in me being debarred from CC as well.
    Well we could do that even without that feature. Access mask editing can see you booted from a subforum.

    Food for thought.

  10. #10
    Spanish_Vicente sledger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Refreshingly Unconcerned With The Vulgar Exigencies Of Veracity
    Posts
    32,467
    A DDoS attack can see everyone booted from the entire forum.

    Food for thought.

  11. #11
    Eternal Optimist / Cricket Web Staff Member GIMH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    On a trip to the moon
    Posts
    49,104
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    We'd have to install a plugin to do that and as has been pointed out before, James doesn't want to install any more plugins until he upgrades the forum to vB4. They make it a lot harder to complete upgrades in general.

    I'm also not convinced it'd work very well here anyway, especially considering how our moderation decisions are actually made. We discuss all decisions as a moderation group before taking action, and if it took two days to remove someone from a thread it'd be a bit pointless. It works better on forums where the moderators have individual autonomy and the members don't demand the respect and fairness that they do here. It's an "unruly child" type punishment really, and I think it'd cause more harm than it'd be worth here.
    Unruly child? But but you gave that punishment to me!!

  12. #12
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    44,041
    Quote Originally Posted by GIMH View Post
    Unruly child? But but you gave that punishment to me!!
    In a thread that asked for forum suggestions and, in the first post, pointed out that joke replies would be given infractions, you made the following suggestions:

    - Remove the option to post in green text
    - Add a wanking gif as a smiley option
    - Make Heef king of the forum

    Unruly child just about summed that up.

  13. #13
    Hall of Fame Member Howe_zat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Top floor, bottom buzzer
    Posts
    16,669

  14. #14
    Spanish_Vicente sledger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Refreshingly Unconcerned With The Vulgar Exigencies Of Veracity
    Posts
    32,467
    Haha, that's fantastic.

  15. #15
    International Coach HeathDavisSpeed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Rummaging through Iain O'Brien's dustbins.
    Posts
    14,575
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    - Make Heef king of the forum

    Unruly child just about summed that up.
    What's childish about that simple request, pray tell?
    >>>>>>WHHOOOOOOOOOSHHHHHHH>>>>>>
    Fascist Dictator of the Heath Davis Appreciation Society
    Supporting Petone's Finest since the very start - Iain O'Brien
    Adam Wheater - Another batsman off the Essex production line
    Also Supporting the All Time #1 Batsman of All Time Ever - Jacques Kallis and the much maligned Peter Siddle.


    Vimes tells it how it is:
    Quote Originally Posted by Samuel_Vimes View Post
    Heath worryingly quick.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is banning Teja ok?
    By Bun in forum Testing Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-04-2011, 01:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •