Furball's Fenoms CC

[Prince EWS]

The Australian Test team only has an index of 1.75

Although if goes up to 2.07 if you replace Beer with Hauritz. It's an accurate system.

[GingerFurball]

Is this index for the squad, the XI I named, or the best XI possible from the 13?

[weeman27bob]

Originally Posted by Prince EWS

This team's index is 1.84.. which won't mean anything to any of you, but that's awesome. The best team index on CPL was 1.15 and the average was 0.99. Obviously you'll get better teams here because CPL is a 22-team comp and the talent is diluted, but this is a seriously awesome team.

I fully expect Fenoms to finish in the bottom three now.

[GingerFurball]

Originally Posted by weeman27bob

I fully expect Fenoms to finish in the bottom three now.

Haha, true.

[Cevno]

*scratches head*

[Prince EWS]

Originally Posted by GingerFurball

Is this index for the squad, the XI I named, or the best XI possible from the 13?

The eleven you named. There was actually a bug in the way I was working it out for non-CPL teams though and your index was in fact 1.76, which is still stupidly awesome.

[Howe_zat]

Originally Posted by Prince EWS

The eleven you named. There was actually a bug in the way I was working it out for non-CPL teams though and your index was in fact 1.76, which is still stupidly awesome.

Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?

[GingerFurball]

Originally Posted by Howe_zat

Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?

Probably just because Beer is that bad.

[Prince EWS]

Originally Posted by Howe_zat

Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?

It's just that Beer is so, so bad. Simming average of 60 with the pill.

[Prince EWS]

Originally Posted by GingerFurball

Probably just because Beer is that bad.

Yes, quite.

[Cevno]

Unless having beer gives you negative points(which it could) that is some weird numbers.

Or Hauritz is about twice the other aussie players ,if i am getting it right?

[Prince EWS]

Originally Posted by Cevno

Unless having beer gives you negative points that is some weird numbers.

Haha, it does though, in a way. It's calculated by what it expects your batsmen to score divided by what it expects your bowlers to concede. Having one of your main bowlers averaging 60 is a problem.

[GingerFurball]

Originally Posted by Prince EWS

Haha, it does though, in a way. It's calculated by what it expects your batsmen to score divided by what it expects your bowlers to concede. Having one of your main bowlers averaging 60 is a problem.

That gives him 10 bowling points in the ITC database doesn't it?

[Prince EWS]

Originally Posted by GingerFurball

That gives him 10 bowling points in the ITC database doesn't it?

In older versions - yes. In this version it just gives an a strike rate of 120 and an economy rate of 50; it doesn't use bowling points as such anymore.

[GingerFurball]

Originally Posted by Prince EWS

In older versions - yes. In this version it just gives an a strike rate of 120 and an economy rate of 50; it doesn't use bowling points as such anymore.

When did Dan update ITC, and does it run on Windows 7?