Furball's Fenoms CC

[Prince EWS]

Is this index for the squad, the XI I named, or the best XI possible from the 13?

The eleven you named. There was actually a bug in the way I was working it out for non-CPL teams though and your index was in fact 1.76, which is still stupidly awesome.

 

[Howe_zat]

The eleven you named. There was actually a bug in the way I was working it out for non-CPL teams though and your index was in fact 1.76, which is still stupidly awesome.

Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?

 

[Furball]

Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?

Probably just because Beer is that bad.

 

[Prince EWS]

Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?

It's just that Beer is so, so bad. Simming average of 60 with the pill.

 

[Prince EWS]

Probably just because Beer is that bad.

Yes, quite.

 

[Cevno]

Unless having beer gives you negative points(which it could) that is some weird numbers.

Or Hauritz is about twice the other aussie players ,if i am getting it right?

 

[Prince EWS]

Unless having beer gives you negative points that is some weird numbers.

Haha, it does though, in a way. It's calculated by what it expects your batsmen to score divided by what it expects your bowlers to concede. Having one of your main bowlers averaging 60 is a problem.

 

[Furball]

Haha, it does though, in a way. It's calculated by what it expects your batsmen to score divided by what it expects your bowlers to concede. Having one of your main bowlers averaging 60 is a problem.

That gives him 10 bowling points in the ITC database doesn't it?

 

[Prince EWS]

That gives him 10 bowling points in the ITC database doesn't it?

In older versions - yes. In this version it just gives an a strike rate of 120 and an economy rate of 50; it doesn't use bowling points as such anymore.

 

[Furball]

In older versions - yes. In this version it just gives an a strike rate of 120 and an economy rate of 50; it doesn't use bowling points as such anymore.

When did Dan update ITC, and does it run on Windows 7?

 

[Prince EWS]

When did Dan update ITC, and does it run on Windows 7?

Haha, ages back. I still see bowling points mentioned in around some of the older instructions but I've always had this version with strike rate and economy rate inputs tbh.

And yeah it does (I'm running Windows 7), although I don't think the installer does.

 

[Furball]

Link please

 

[centurymaker]

This team's index is 1.84.. which won't mean anything to any of you, but that's awesome. The best team index on CPL was 1.15 and the average was 0.99. Obviously you'll get better teams here because CPL is a 22-team comp and the talent is diluted, but this is a seriously awesome team.

Is this rating far higher than other people's teams?

 

[Prince EWS]

Is this rating far higher than other people's teams?

Haven't checked other people's teams tbh but it's far higher than all the CPL teams.

 

[centurymaker]

Haven't checked other people's teams tbh but it's far higher than all the CPL teams.

Where is the CPL sub-forum?

 

[Spark]

The Australian Test team only has an index of 1.75

Although if goes up to 2.07 if you replace Beer with Hauritz. It's an accurate system.

Ritzy (y)

 

[Furball]

Chris Rogers
Jacques Rudolph
Martin van Jaarsveld
Michael Hussey
Owais Shah
Andrew McDonald
James Foster
Ryan Sidebottom
Dale Steyn
Shoaib Akhtar
Muttiah Muralitharan
---------------------------
Shane Warne
Kabir Ali
Yuvraj Singh
Obus Pienaar

Not too shabby IMO

 

[Spark]

			Mts	Inns	N.O.	Runs	Balls	Avg	S.R.	HS	100s	50s	Ducks
Y Singh			6	12	0	610	1129	50.83	54.03	149	2	3	0
MEK Hussey		6	12	1	501	1020	45.55	49.12	72	0	5	0
AB McDonald		6	12	2	355	658	35.50	53.95	103	1	2	0
JA Rudolph		6	12	0	344	712	28.67	48.31	86	0	3	0
CJL Rogers		6	12	0	315	650	26.25	48.46	76	0	1	0
HAPW Jayawardene	3	6	1	188	335	37.60	56.12	100	1	0	0
OA Shah			2	4	1	176	359	58.67	49.03	94	0	1	2
K Ali			6	11	0	167	315	15.18	53.02	29	0	0	1
DW Steyn		6	11	3	147	266	18.38	55.26	46	0	0	0
M van Jaarsveld		3	6	0	137	321	22.83	42.68	59	0	1	2
JS Foster		3	6	1	117	255	23.40	45.88	37	0	0	1
M Muralitharan		5	10	4	92	167	15.33	55.09	49	0	0	0
RJ Sidebottom		3	5	0	46	64	9.20	71.88	16	0	0	0
AJ Pienaar		1	2	0	32	50	16.00	64.00	21	0	0	0
SK Warne		3	5	0	29	58	5.80	50.00	13	0	0	2
S Akhtar		1	2	0	6	15	3.00	40.00	6	0	0	0

On request.

 

[Daemon]

			Mts	Inns	N.O.	Runs	Balls	Avg	S.R.	HS	100s	50s	Ducks
Y Singh			6	12	0	610	1129	50.83	54.03	149	2	3	0
MEK Hussey		6	12	1	501	1020	45.55	49.12	72	0	5	0
AB McDonald		6	12	2	355	658	35.50	53.95	103	1	2	0
JA Rudolph		6	12	0	344	712	28.67	48.31	86	0	3	0
CJL Rogers		6	12	0	315	650	26.25	48.46	76	0	1	0
HAPW Jayawardene	3	6	1	188	335	37.60	56.12	100	1	0	0
OA Shah			2	4	1	176	359	58.67	49.03	94	0	1	2
K Ali			6	11	0	167	315	15.18	53.02	29	0	0	1
DW Steyn		6	11	3	147	266	18.38	55.26	46	0	0	0
M van Jaarsveld		3	6	0	137	321	22.83	42.68	59	0	1	2
JS Foster		3	6	1	117	255	23.40	45.88	37	0	0	1
M Muralitharan		5	10	4	92	167	15.33	55.09	49	0	0	0
RJ Sidebottom		3	5	0	46	64	9.20	71.88	16	0	0	0
AJ Pienaar		1	2	0	32	50	16.00	64.00	21	0	0	0
SK Warne		3	5	0	29	58	5.80	50.00	13	0	0	2
S Akhtar		1	2	0	6	15	3.00	40.00	6	0	0	0

On request.

****. How long does this take you? I've been doing it manually all this while

 

[Spark]

Took me about five minutes I just manually searched for each name in the file, copied the line over to a new one. I'm not about to do it for everyone every round though.