Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 43

Thread: Furball's Fenoms CC

  1. #16
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,645
    The Australian Test team only has an index of 1.75

    Although if goes up to 2.07 if you replace Beer with Hauritz. It's an accurate system.
    ~ Cribbertarian ~

    Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since December 2009

  2. #17
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    20,145
    Is this index for the squad, the XI I named, or the best XI possible from the 13?

  3. #18
    International 12th Man weeman27bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,724
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    This team's index is 1.84.. which won't mean anything to any of you, but that's awesome. The best team index on CPL was 1.15 and the average was 0.99. Obviously you'll get better teams here because CPL is a 22-team comp and the talent is diluted, but this is a seriously awesome team.
    I fully expect Fenoms to finish in the bottom three now.

  4. #19
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    20,145
    Quote Originally Posted by weeman27bob View Post
    I fully expect Fenoms to finish in the bottom three now.
    Haha, true.


  5. #20
    Hall of Fame Member Cevno's Avatar
    Simon Champion!
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    15,833
    *scratches head*

  6. #21
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,645
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    Is this index for the squad, the XI I named, or the best XI possible from the 13?
    The eleven you named. There was actually a bug in the way I was working it out for non-CPL teams though and your index was in fact 1.76, which is still stupidly awesome.

  7. #22
    Hall of Fame Member Howe_zat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Top floor, bottom buzzer
    Posts
    16,442
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    The eleven you named. There was actually a bug in the way I was working it out for non-CPL teams though and your index was in fact 1.76, which is still stupidly awesome.
    Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

    Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?
    Every 5 years we have an election and have to decide who are the least obnoxious out of all the men. Then one gets in and they age really quickly. Which is always fun to watch.

  8. #23
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    20,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Howe_zat View Post
    Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

    Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?
    Probably just because Beer is that bad.

  9. #24
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,645
    Quote Originally Posted by Howe_zat View Post
    Forgive me for treating the index with a dash of scepticism when Nathan Hauritz gives you an extra 0.3 out of 1.7, though

    Still, it might be interesting to see how these teams rate on the scale compared to where they'll eventually end up. Might give us some pre-tournament odds?
    It's just that Beer is so, so bad. Simming average of 60 with the pill.

  10. #25
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,645
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    Probably just because Beer is that bad.
    Yes, quite.

  11. #26
    Hall of Fame Member Cevno's Avatar
    Simon Champion!
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    15,833
    Unless having beer gives you negative points(which it could) that is some weird numbers.

    Or Hauritz is about twice the other aussie players ,if i am getting it right?
    Last edited by Cevno; 09-05-2011 at 12:15 PM.

  12. #27
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,645
    Quote Originally Posted by Cevno View Post
    Unless having beer gives you negative points that is some weird numbers.
    Haha, it does though, in a way. It's calculated by what it expects your batsmen to score divided by what it expects your bowlers to concede. Having one of your main bowlers averaging 60 is a problem.

  13. #28
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    20,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    Haha, it does though, in a way. It's calculated by what it expects your batsmen to score divided by what it expects your bowlers to concede. Having one of your main bowlers averaging 60 is a problem.
    That gives him 10 bowling points in the ITC database doesn't it?

  14. #29
    Global Moderator Prince EWS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Moving to Somalia
    Posts
    43,645
    Quote Originally Posted by GingerFurball View Post
    That gives him 10 bowling points in the ITC database doesn't it?
    In older versions - yes. In this version it just gives an a strike rate of 120 and an economy rate of 50; it doesn't use bowling points as such anymore.

  15. #30
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Furball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Anyone But England
    Posts
    20,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
    In older versions - yes. In this version it just gives an a strike rate of 120 and an economy rate of 50; it doesn't use bowling points as such anymore.
    When did Dan update ITC, and does it run on Windows 7?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •