England has a divisional system rather than a tiering system. It's an important difference. In a divisional system, teams are segregated by quality but players aren't - for example, you can be the best player in England by play Division 2 because that's where your county is ranked. In South Africa they have a tiered system whereby the lower tier (amateur cricket) merely acts as a player feeder system for the top tier (which is a now professional franchise system). If you're the best player in South Africa, you're playing franchise cricket in the SuperSport Series whenever available.But aren't there 2 tiers IN both England and Srilanka ?
Yeah, what I posted is only used to measure the balance between bat and ball in each competition - essentially the conditions. There are other measures to determine the quality of a competition and the number of teams is a factor there.India would be interesting in this regard too ,as the averages would vary with both extremes with the number of teams involved.
There are both bowlers and batsman with very good numbers there.
Lol.I agree with the disagreement.
He has like 4 retired players.
Murali and Warne have both retired so that's two. Murali doesn't actually count as retired as such because he played his last game in the 2010 season but he still has.I'd like to know who the 3 other retired players are.
Yeah, but Warne's my back up, I'm not going to be playing him as a first choice.Murali and Warne have both retired so that's two. Murali doesn't actually count as retired as such because he played his last game in the 2010 season but he still has.
He's considered as retired, yes, but players who continue to play limited overs cricket aren't penalised for their retirement as much. Lara playing T20 cricket in Zimbabwe helps him there and if he didn't get any penalty at all for his retirement, he would actually be the third best batsman in the database. It was a good pick.PEWS Lara is considered retired isn't he? Unless T20s count which I think they don't. I think we're ****ed, seeing as he played his last FC three years back
Yeah, no doubt in my mind Warne would be an above average spinner if this was a real competition and he was paid a gazillion dollars to come out of FIrst Class retirement.He still performs pretty ****ing well in IPL for a guy who hasn't played any other serious cricket for 4 years. I reckon if he wanted to come back to FC cricket he'd be performing like a gun pretty quickly, and that he's probably a much better bet than some other no-name spinner I could have picked who has amazing stats on cricinfo.
Well, all your picks have been gun. I don't think there's any other way to put it.Curious as to why you think my side is the best, but as you're the one who's built the db I'm quite happy with that endorsement.
Haha, well people tried to do that elsewhere and it didn't work. People who just picked who they thought would go well if this was real seemed to fare far better, because no-one really understands how it works. Going really stats-orientated early and picking up players from obscure competitions backfired.So this game is essentially about second-guessing the quirks of PEWS's database?
I doubt that.Yeah, no doubt in my mind Warne would be an above average spinner if this was a real competition and he was paid a gazillion dollars to come out of FIrst Class retirement.
Why haven't guys like McGrath and Shaun Pollock been picked then? Or Hayden? Surely they'd go better than, say, Dominic Cork, or Rohit Sharma?Haha, well people tried to do that elsewhere and it didn't work. People who just picked who they thought would go well if this was real seemed to fare far better, because no-one really understands how it works. Going really stats-orientated early and picking up players from obscure competitions backfired.
The draft is more fun/important than the simming anyway.