Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
Yeh, I know. Thats why he’s compensation for us having to play 6 away tests.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
The ATG Teams General arguing/discussing thread
- Thread starter Red
- Start date
TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
But they WANT to
kyear2
Cricketer Of The Year
South Africa arguably, but don't think England is anymore.
Fuller Pilch
Hall of Fame Member
Definitely
Hobbs
Hutton
Compton
Hammond
Barrington
Stokes
Botham
Knott
Laker
Trueman
Barnes
kyear2
Cricketer Of The Year
The only bowler I can see being a handful for India in that lineup is Trueman.
TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
England AT XI is way out of India's league, but that's not exactly unexpected given England have been playing Tests for 150 years
as an aside surely Stokes being in England's ATG Test team is a bit of a stretch
as an aside surely Stokes being in England's ATG Test team is a bit of a stretch
stephen
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
England have a lot of combinations which are possible. I think an attack of Truman, Laker and Botham would be at the centre of any team, as is a top order of Hobbs, Hutton, Sutcliffe and Hammond. Knott is generally the keeper I see most picked. Around this core a number of sides can be built. Grace, Barrington, Ranji, Compton, Rhodes are all batting options. Tyson, Anderson, Larwood and a few others are all options for the other pace position.
Personally today I prefer:
Hobbs
Hutton
Sutcliffe
Hammond
Barrington
Rhodes
Botham
Knott
Truman
Larwood
Laker
Australia are flexible in their openers and their 5/6. Pretty much every other position picks itself - Bradman at 3, Smith at 4, Gilchrist, Warne, Lillee and McGrath are all locks. The third seamer could easily be any of Davidson, Lindwall or Cummins (personally I prefer Davo for the left arm variety). Openers could be any two of Hayden, Trumper, Simpson, Lawry, Ponsford or a few others. 5/6 has Border, Waugh, Miller, G Chappell, Ponting all competing for a spot.
Today I prefer:
Simpson
Hayden
Bradman
Smith
Chappell G
Border
Gilchrist+
Davidson
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
The West Indies have a huge number of choices for their middle order in particular. They lack an ATG spinner but do have Gibbs who would be an adequate backup on decks that required it.
Today I prefer:
Greenidge
Haynes
Richards
Lara
Headley
Sobers
Dujon+
Marshall
Holding/Gibbs
Garner
Ambrose
Personally today I prefer:
Hobbs
Hutton
Sutcliffe
Hammond
Barrington
Rhodes
Botham
Knott
Truman
Larwood
Laker
Australia are flexible in their openers and their 5/6. Pretty much every other position picks itself - Bradman at 3, Smith at 4, Gilchrist, Warne, Lillee and McGrath are all locks. The third seamer could easily be any of Davidson, Lindwall or Cummins (personally I prefer Davo for the left arm variety). Openers could be any two of Hayden, Trumper, Simpson, Lawry, Ponsford or a few others. 5/6 has Border, Waugh, Miller, G Chappell, Ponting all competing for a spot.
Today I prefer:
Simpson
Hayden
Bradman
Smith
Chappell G
Border
Gilchrist+
Davidson
Warne
Lillee
McGrath
The West Indies have a huge number of choices for their middle order in particular. They lack an ATG spinner but do have Gibbs who would be an adequate backup on decks that required it.
Today I prefer:
Greenidge
Haynes
Richards
Lara
Headley
Sobers
Dujon+
Marshall
Holding/Gibbs
Garner
Ambrose
TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Busy Monday at work stephen?
a massive zebra
International Captain
I agree the England all time XI is well ahead of India. The batting is about the same but England's bowling is way out of India's league, unless they are playing on a raging turner. Even then Laker, Verity, Underwood, Wardle, Rhodes and Swann are arguably comparable to any spin attack India could produce. Having said this, most of the guys who would make the England all time XI are very old players. If we did a post 1965 all time XI, India probably have the edge over England.
Hobbs
Hutton
Hammond
Barrington
Ranji
Botham
Knott
Rhodes
Laker
Trueman
Barnes
And of those I've seen:
Cook
Stewart
Root
Pietersen
Thorpe
Stokes
Prior
Flintoff
Swann
Gough
Anderson
Broad could come in for Flintoff if they had been struggling for wickets and really need to win a game.
Hobbs
Hutton
Hammond
Barrington
Ranji
Botham
Knott
Rhodes
Laker
Trueman
Barnes
And of those I've seen:
Cook
Stewart
Root
Pietersen
Thorpe
Stokes
Prior
Flintoff
Swann
Gough
Anderson
Broad could come in for Flintoff if they had been struggling for wickets and really need to win a game.
Last edited:
An England AT XI must be picked with the intention of trying to beat the #1 AT XI, an Australia AT XI (and Bradman). The person who may be able to pull this off is Jardine, who was no slouch with the bat. Thus, he gets in as captain, and provided with the tools to do the job.
01. Hobbs
02. Sutcliffe
03. Barrington
04. Hammond (vc)
05. Jardine (c)
06. Botham
07. Knott
08. Trueman
09. Tyson
10. Barnes
11. Verity
01. Hobbs
02. Sutcliffe
03. Barrington
04. Hammond (vc)
05. Jardine (c)
06. Botham
07. Knott
08. Trueman
09. Tyson
10. Barnes
11. Verity
Coronis
Cricketer Of The Year
Hobbs
Sutcliffe
Hutton*
Hammond
Barrington
Botham
Knott+
Laker
Trueman
Anderson
Barnes
So long as Anderson is fine at first change this team will do very well. Certainly should have an edge over any Indian side. Lose to Australia, lose to South Africa and the Windies unless its on a turning wicket, where they have a distinct spin advantage. Would be quality contests though.
Sutcliffe
Hutton*
Hammond
Barrington
Botham
Knott+
Laker
Trueman
Anderson
Barnes
So long as Anderson is fine at first change this team will do very well. Certainly should have an edge over any Indian side. Lose to Australia, lose to South Africa and the Windies unless its on a turning wicket, where they have a distinct spin advantage. Would be quality contests though.
Last edited:
TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
So bodyline is allowed in this scenario? Or are we expecting Jardine to come up with another funky anti-Bradman plan
ParwazHaiJunoon
First Class Debutant
Not one but three bradmans. Bradman Lite (Labuschange), Bradman (Smith) & Bradman Ultra Pro Max (the real one).
Red
The normal awards that everyone else has
tbh I usually just forget someone in these scenarios. He could replace any of Trumper, Border or Smith. Most likely Trumper, but he is also my reserve opener.