Go Back   Cricket Web > Other > Off Topic



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-08-2012, 05:00 PM   #1 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 2,198
When does a song become a classic?

A couple of days ago a co-worker in her mid-20s glanced through this playlist of mine:-

Killers – All These Things That I’ve Done
Surfjan Stevens - Chicago
TV on the Radio – Dancing Choose
Justice – DVNO
Lupe Fiasco – Daydreamin
Ms Dynamite – Dy-Na-Mi-Tee
Arctic Monkeys – Fake Tales of San Francisco
Flaming Lips – Fight Test
Doves - Pounding
WIlco – I Am Trying to Break Your Heart
Richard Hawley – I Sleep Alone
White Stripes – In the Cold, Cold Night
Goldfrapp – Little Bird
Elbow – Mirrorball
Arcade Fire - Rebellion (Lies)
Turin Brakes – Slack
Beck – Paper Tiger
Rufus Wainwright – Peach Tree
Pineapple Thief – Remember Us
Drive-By Truckers – Ronnie and Neil
LCD Soundsystem – Someone Great
Icarus Line – Spike Island
Animal Collective – Summertime Clothes
Nick Cave & Bad Seeds – There She Goes, My Beautiful World
Fleet Foxes – Your Protector
Mylo – Zenophile
Radiohead – 15 Step

Her comment - "Definitely some of the classics in there!".

So to the question in the topic subject - when does a song become a classic?

At my advanced age, I consider "classics" to be from the 60s to the 80s, possibly early 90s. After that, I tend to think of them as relatively new. Shouldn't a song earn the title "classic" based on its own longevity, rather than that of the listener?

Or is it simply a mark of quality, e.g. a great song from 2010 say could be an instant classic?

Suppose it depends on your definition of classic.

With apologies if this has been discussed previously.
__________________
Website:
www.chasingthedon.com

Blog:
http://chasingthedon.blogspot.com/
chasingthedon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 05:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
cpr
Cricketer Of The Year
 
cpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 9,724
A song can become an 'instant classic' if it really captures a moment in time - eg Three Lions in '96, the obvious ones like Band Aid etc. Those are few and far between, and not on your list.

To earn the classic title the traditional way, the song needs to endure, naturally, and either represent a band (Smells Like Teen Spirit), an era (Puple Haze), a sound (Bohemian Rhapsody), an emotion (Layla)..... It can be anything, but its a connection that sets it on a pedestal above its peers. Newer songs struggle, as time is what gives it its gravitas (that and most stuff nowadays is **** in comparison!), but its faesable if it really captures the heart for something new to be a classic.

Half those songs would struggle to be classics in that artists own back catelogue, not like its the big name songs you've been listening to
__________________
"All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
Quote:
Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers

Last edited by cpr; 23-08-2012 at 05:45 PM.
cpr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 05:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
International Coach
 
PhoenixFire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bitch please, I'm from West Yorkshire
Posts: 14,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpr View Post
(that and most stuff nowadays is **** in comparison!),
imma get so riled if you're being serious
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Top_Cat View Post
1) Had double pneumonia as a kid, as did my twin sis. Doctors told my parents to pray that we lived through the night. Dad said **** off, I'm an atheist, you ****s better save my kids, etc. Then prayed anyway.
PhoenixFire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 06:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Top_Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 21,159
In some ways, it's a pointless discussion. Songs that are known as 'classics' generally have been made so by sweetheart royalty deals signed decades ago which guarantees they appear on commercial radio playlists. They form a default brick wall of songs which get played to death and, in the cracks of that wall at specific timeslots, only then does new music get played which, again, are all subject to the deals signed by majors with radio stations to get them on playlists. Only on small community radio stations do playlists not apply in a blanket sense and some of the bigger ones do use them. It means guaranteed airplay according to the whims of the record companies.

The point; what are 'classic' songs has been largely manufactured. Play something often enough and it'll start to be regarded as a 'classic', regardless of artistic merit. Not bagging the system, it is what it is.
__________________
Check out my bands!

The Colourphonics

http://www.youtube.com/user/TheColourphonics
http://twitter.com/colourphonics

Candice and The Arcade Villains

http://triplejunearthed.com.au/Candi...ArcadeVillains
Top_Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 06:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Spark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: A Blood Rainbow
Posts: 26,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhoenixFire View Post
imma get so riled if you're being serious
If he's talking about pop music, it's quite a popular school of thought in music circles that, even accounting for hipster bias, the quality of modern pop music is unusually poor, superficial and transitive.
__________________
+ and the buzz surrounds it does +


* * *

in which cribb demonstrates the power of the jinx


Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spark View Post
[Dhoni on 99] Barely seen any of the day's play (for sanity's sake), but here's a competition that might be fun: things more common than a Tim Bresnan wicket
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prince EWS View Post
3) Dhoni scoring a composed, valuable Test hundred against good bowlers
Quote:
129.1 Anderson to Dhoni, OUT, Dhoni is run out on 99!
Spark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 07:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Top_Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 21,159
I, personally, would argue that market and industry conditions have changed so much to render pop music comparison between now and even a decade ago pretty much moot. The comparison is harder the further back you go. Superficial sugary crap purely to play to the masses is absolutely nothing new. There's a lot more of it, absolutely, but there's also just more music in general to choose from. A lot of niche genres now would have been niche one-band genres in the 70's. It's a tough thing to quantify, though. Yes Stairway to Heaven was on the pop charts but, well, there was nowhere else for it to go. Would it even chart now? Doubt it. Got nothing to do with the quality of the song but how the industry gets songs on the radio/TV these days.

One thing I do remember seeing was an experiment a few years back where several examples of songs with artistic merit scored by the experimenters were sampled from multiple eras. The same songs had their sonic quality changed via equalisation, volume boosting, degradation of bitrates, multiple file formats, etc. to give various good and bad quality recordings of the songs. The songs were played to people, the quality of the recording was the experimental manipulation here.

They found that, broadly speaking, songs which were considered pap scored highly with the best quality recordings but the crap quality meant the scores dropped off heaps. The 'good' songs, their scores weren't affected much at all. Being cautious, you could say the quality of the song does matter to people but what people get exposed to on a regular basis now is what's vastly different.

The country of exposure matters too. My band's album got some great reviews and airplay in The Netherlands, Belgium, Germany and Poland. In the US, we got some college radio play and a couple of quick mentions elsewhere (e.g. http://www.goldminemag.com/blogs/pro...new-label-home), in OZ we got one review and absolutely zero interest from independent record companies so we had to sign to an American one just to get any distribution. It changes drastically too; every indie band with a glockenspiel/melodica gets killed to death on JJJ now whereas the same bands were playing to 5 people in the 90's. Conversely, every angsty garage band which would have dominated then is working their arses off to scrape together 20 people for a show now.

Can't help but feel a bit rejected....

Last edited by Top_Cat; 23-08-2012 at 07:27 PM.
Top_Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 07:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
wellAlbidarned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: spaghetti
Posts: 4,899
In my opinion the concept of universally agreed "classics" no longer exists because there's such an enormous variety of popular music completely off the radar of the whole "record label and charts" system. In the past, however, people were comparatively force-fed music in a narrow stream which meant it was possible for good music to attain incredible status.
__________________
"MTV isn't really my cup of tea... mostly because I hate huge pieces of **** in my tea." - Aziz Ansari
wellAlbidarned is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-08-2012, 08:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
Spark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: A Blood Rainbow
Posts: 26,724
Yep, indeed. The notion of "classic" is now very much genre-dependent; and often knowledge of said 'classic' outside its genre is minimal.
Spark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2012, 12:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
uvelocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: seamy road
Posts: 8,220
I'm old. music is too hard now
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spikey View Post
I don't have a problem with the level of debate in CC

I'm sick and tired of skidmark00's tone in the AFL thread though
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jono View Post
No doubt. uvelocity the better AFL poster, I think we'd all agree with that.
uvelocity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2012, 12:26 AM   #10 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Spikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: All Glory To The Nev
Posts: 23,973
call me maybe is already classic
__________________
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?

With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
Spikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2012, 12:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
uvelocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: seamy road
Posts: 8,220
uvelocity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2012, 01:32 AM   #12 (permalink)
Englishman
 
BoyBrumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Doing the stance
Posts: 42,567
Some absolute quality stuff in ctd's playlist, but personally then only one I'd have in consideration for "classic" status would be All These Things That I've Done. & this from someone who's choked back tears to I Am Trying To Break Your Heart.

The former was one of those opening shots that immediately makes one sit up and think "woah, who the **** is this?" Some songs have such an immediacy and such a (wholly ironic, given the first quality) depth to stand up to repeat playings that they act like an adrenaline shot. Mind Over Money by Turin Brakes was another, as was Newborn by Elbow.

Neil Tennant (him out of the Pet Shop Boys) described what makes an immediate classic best, he bought the 12" version of Blue Monday with no great expectation because he'd quite liked Everything's Gone Green and when he played it he said it was so perfect and so close to what his own nascent band was trying to do that he went away and binned two album's worth of material because he knew nothing he'd written was in the same ballpark.
__________________
- As featured in The Independent.

"This is not the time for namby-pamby promising youngsters who might just do something; not the time for building for the future. Pragmatism rules and they don't come more pragmatic than Rogers."
- Victor Marks makes the case for stiff-legged and stiff-armed 35 year old left-handers in Ashes squads
BoyBrumby is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2012, 01:39 AM   #13 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Top_Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 21,159
FYI we got another good review a few months back I didn't know about from an Amazon reviewer.

Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: The Colourphonics
Top_Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-08-2012, 07:25 AM   #14 (permalink)
International Coach
 
grecian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hanging on !
Posts: 11,255
Classics are different, for different people though. I post a bit on Digital Spy, and it certainly gives me interesting views for music. Tends to be very pop orientated. I read a serious long post, not txt spk or anything about how the Spice Girls and S Club (FFS) were the classic groups now, because they were on the radio all the time, and were a decade or so old, so they've stood the test of time, and the likes of the Beatles and the Stones were invisible. People agreed with her.

Presumably she only listens to Heart and Heat FM, yet it's amazing how venerated these "bands" are in some places.

So I dunno really, and I can't judge coz I think Hersham Boys & Echo Beach are "classics".
__________________
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.
Walt Whitman
grecian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-08-2012, 07:51 AM   #15 (permalink)
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
 
Uppercut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 21,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spark View Post
If he's talking about pop music, it's quite a popular school of thought in music circles that, even accounting for hipster bias, the quality of modern pop music is unusually poor, superficial and transitive.
I like pop now more than I ever have in the past, despite getting to the age where I should really have grown out of it. I'm not sure why. "Better" music just feels a bit pretentious to me lately.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
The Filth have comfortably the better bowling. But the Gash have the batting. Might be quite good to watch.
Uppercut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A forum for Classic threads. Cevno Site Discussion 52 01-06-2011 04:56 AM
Team India Theme Song Turbinator Cricket Chat 36 06-01-2011 09:39 AM
'Love the way you bat' (lets make a song!) AlanJLegend Cricket Chat 8 19-08-2010 08:37 AM
World Cup theme song Sir Alex 2010 ICC World Twenty20 - West Indies 9 07-05-2010 10:49 AM
Immigrant Song Steulen Off Topic 11 13-02-2010 09:13 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:48 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web