Cricket Player Manager
Page 26 of 29 FirstFirst ... 162425262728 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 390 of 423

Thread: Mass Shooting Incidents in the United States

  1. #376
    Hall of Fame Member Cevno's Avatar
    Simon Champion!
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    16,146
    Quote Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
    Ffs, my problem isn't necessarily the right (although it is a problem) my problem is that THE SYSTEM doesn't allow the legislature to legislate against that. Whereas a statutory bill of rights, if a bill of rights had to exist, wouldn't have that barrier.
    So basically you are saying they shouldn't have the concept of Constitutional amendments passed by 2/3rds majority ?
    Last edited by Cevno; 17-01-2013 at 08:11 AM.

  2. #377
    Hall of Fame Member Cevno's Avatar
    Simon Champion!
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    16,146
    Quote Originally Posted by Uppercut View Post
    Small states hold a disproportionate amount of political power.
    That's again how it has evolved due to Size and heterogeneity of the Country. In other countries sometimes less than 1% of the vote can hold the whole executive to ransom too, depending on how everyone votes. The more diverse and bigger the country more likely that is to happen unless there is some exceptionally popular leader.
    Last edited by Cevno; 17-01-2013 at 08:19 AM.

  3. #378
    Request Your Custom Title Now! benchmark00's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Is this CricketWeb's greatest poster in the short history of the forum?
    Posts
    37,157
    Quote Originally Posted by Cevno View Post
    So basically you are saying they shouldn't have the concept of Constitutional amendments passed by 2/3rds majority ?
    I'm not sure if you're being deliberately obtuse or not?

    If a Bill of Rights is necessary, which in my opinion it certainly is not, why must it be entrenched within the constitution?
    Parmi | #1 draft pick | Jake King is **** | Big Bash League tipping champion of the universe
    Come and Paint Turtle
    Quote Originally Posted by Jono View Post
    Kohli. Do something in test cricket for once please.

    Thanks.

  4. #379
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,953
    So 50.1% of legislature can't overturn it based on some event (like 9/11), stuff that they'd regret and would be very negative (IMO) for the country.
    Quote Originally Posted by KungFu_Kallis View Post
    Peter Siddle top scores in both innings....... Matthew Wade gets out twice in one ball
    "The future light cone of the next Indian fast bowler is exactly the same as the past light cone of the previous one"
    -My beliefs summarized in words much more eloquent than I could come up with

    How the Universe came from nothing


  5. #380
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Uppercut's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    23,860
    We've actually started to legalize some drugs in parts of the country, and I expect that trend to continue and expand. In any case, those laws have nothing to do with the constitution. Those laws can be made and repealed by Congress at any time - how would that be any different at all if we didn't have a constitution? I am not sure about your argument there.
    I don't think it would be, but Cevno was arguing for the system on the grounds of its liberty/social record so I was just quickly pointing out that it's really not in very good shape on those issues at the moment. But I don't think you can argue either way for the efficiency of the political system based on the state of the country. No real alternative to measure it against.

    The main part of my argument was the bit above that, the bit about all the corruption, gridlock and unfair representation. They're huge, gaping problems that most Western countries don't have to anywhere near the same extent.
    Quote Originally Posted by zaremba View Post
    The Filth have comfortably the better bowling. But the Gash have the batting. Might be quite good to watch.

  6. #381
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,953
    Well I agree with you on many things - there are lots of structural changes I'd make. But for this discussion, removing a constitutional bill of rights would not be anywhere amongst them.

    And as I said, I think our record on things like speech, search & seizure over the past 200+ years is pretty good. That's the stuff that's in the bill of rights. So you're kind of proving my point about that - we don't really have a great record on stuff that's not in there. To me, that's an argument of expanding it . I'd put something about victimless crimes in there, for sure.

    As for not being in a great shape right now - meh. It'll ebb and flow. I think we have a tendency to overreact to the latest situation. In the long run, it'll be fine. I have enough trust built up through history that the system will see us through.

  7. #382
    State Regular L Trumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    906
    Quote Originally Posted by Uppercut View Post
    I don't think it would be, but Cevno was arguing for the system on the grounds of its liberty/social record so I was just quickly pointing out that it's really not in very good shape on those issues at the moment. But I don't think you can argue either way for the efficiency of the political system based on the state of the country. No real alternative to measure it against.

    The main part of my argument was the bit above that, the bit about all the corruption, gridlock and unfair representation. They're huge, gaping problems that most Western countries don't have to anywhere near the same extent.
    At the moment is the key word here. It may not be optimal and need some changes, but by and large it worked better than all other models. If it is failing then change will come. But I don't see that much of a problem. There still is a crazy right wing out there, but eventually to be back in power they need to come back to middle. For all the so called crazies in US, most of the time only moderates will get elected at the top offices. Obviously it changed during W's presidency and his supreme court choices.

  8. #383
    Request Your Custom Title Now! benchmark00's Avatar
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Is this CricketWeb's greatest poster in the short history of the forum?
    Posts
    37,157
    Quote Originally Posted by silentstriker View Post
    So 50.1% of legislature can't overturn it based on some event (like 9/11), stuff that they'd regret and would be very negative (IMO) for the country.
    That brings us to the next point of lack of compulsory voting, which cheapens the doctrine of responsible government. The legislature should reflect the morality of the majority. If they don't represent them then they'll be voted out.

  9. #384
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,953
    Quote Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
    That brings us to the next point of lack of compulsory voting, which cheapens the doctrine of responsible government. The legislature should reflect the morality of the majority. If they don't represent them then they'll be voted out.
    Legislature does pretty much reflect the morality of the majority though. EDIT: Yea, I see what you mean - I would probably be in favor of mandatory voting.

    But even so, I don't always trust the passions of a small majority. And neither do most people here I think (at some point you'd be a minority on something important). In the end, it's going to be a democracy but we've decided as a democracy that there are certain things that we want to guarantee everyone - especially if you're not part of a 50.1% of a majority - that can't be taken away without a much broader agreement of society. And I agree with having that type of standard. As I said though, I would make it a little easier to pass amendments (maybe 3/5ths instead of 2/3rd of Congress), but in principle, I think it's necessary for us and in no small part has allowed the country to remain stable through some turbulent times.
    Last edited by silentstriker; 17-01-2013 at 09:01 AM.

  10. #385
    Global Moderator Spark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    A Blood Rainbow
    Posts
    33,510
    The small minority argument is precisely why you have a system of counterweights in place to avoid tyranny of the majority, but so does everyone. You don't need a constitutional bill of rights for that, surely.

    e: small majority. ****it, 2am, going to sleep
    + time's fickle card game ~ with you and i +


    forever 63*

  11. #386
    Request Your Custom Title Now! Spikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    All Glory To The Nev
    Posts
    33,920
    Quote Originally Posted by L Trumper View Post
    At the moment is the key word here. It may not be optimal and need some changes, but by and large it worked better than all other models. If it is failing then change will come.

    i think the problem some have is that it's really hard to actually see change coming. the model isn't very flexible...
    Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?

    With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left

  12. #387
    Hall of Fame Member Cevno's Avatar
    Simon Champion!
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    16,146
    In India not having guaranteed rights in the constitution and a concept of basic structure which SC safeguards, would have certainly caused a few more religious riots and maybe another partition of the country by now.

    After events like Partition/Babri Masjid demolition some party would have wanted to pass bills making India a Hindu Rashtra and what not in a religiously surcharged atmosphere and probably have gotten some support.

  13. #388
    The Wheel is Forever silentstriker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    37,953
    Quote Originally Posted by Spark View Post
    The small minority argument is precisely why you have a system of counterweights in place to avoid tyranny of the majority, but so does everyone. You don't need a constitutional bill of rights for that, surely.

    e: small majority. ****it, 2am, going to sleep
    What type of protections are you talking about?



    In any case, another reason I think it's a mistake to push too hard on guns is that while guns are responsible for a lot of violence, the real problem with much of the violent crime is the war on drugs. If Obama wants to waste some political capital, he ought to spend it on that. Neither would be successful but it would do more good in the long term to have that conversation - and he'd find some conservative (primarily libertarian) allies there. The war on drugs is destroying so many lives so needlessly. I think while politically its a difficult sell, probably much more so than guns, its much more necessary and has a bigger upside. The problem with guns is that there are already 300 million in circulation in the US. The cats out of the bag. I am not suggesting that it means we should give up because we shouldn't, but its not realistic to get rid of those guns.

    Plus, in the war on drugs, you don't have to worry about all your political capital going down the drain because unlike guns, there is no amendment in the way. Congress can end the war on drugs or vastly change it and the changes are much more likely to be immediate and I think, permanant. For example even if you ban handguns, which you could never pass, but even if you did, it would be declared unconstitutional like Chicago's handgun ban was.

    And I bet it saves a lot more lives, including children's, than any realistic gun proposal that has a chance of still being constitutional.

    Plus Obama an most elected officials have been the biggest hypocrites on drugs. They've all admitted to using drugs yet if they had been caught (especially if they were from poor communities), they would have had a record, might never have made it to college, or get a stable job. Let alone being elected to elected office with a prison record. Yet that's precisely the sentence these guys are advocating for all these young men (primarily) for doing what they themselves did. It's ruining so many lives, for doing something completely nonviolent. Not to mention fueling massive violence in the cities and enriching cartels.

    That to me is the single biggest issue in America right now. It's disgusting that we don't call out politicians on that. Their own admitted hypocrisy.

    /random off topic rant

  14. #389
    Global Moderator vic_orthdox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    25,553
    Compulsory voting; it might actually lead to a logical Republican Party if it had to appeal to the centre rather than make sure that the nut jobs voted.

  15. #390
    Hall of Fame Member Marcuss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Above you
    Posts
    15,731

Page 26 of 29 FirstFirst ... 162425262728 ... LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Pool C - Australia, Ireland, Italy, Russia, United States
    By James in forum Rugby Union World Cup 2011
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 03-10-2011, 01:46 PM
  2. Famous Incidents of Gamesmanship/Cheating
    By Marcuss in forum General Sports Forum
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 24-12-2010, 07:02 AM
  3. Group C - England, United States, Algeria, Slovenia
    By James in forum 2010 Football World Cup - South Africa
    Replies: 869
    Last Post: 25-06-2010, 09:13 AM
  4. *Official* English Football Season 2005-06
    By Neil Pickup in forum General Sports Forum
    Replies: 5813
    Last Post: 23-06-2006, 03:55 AM
  5. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 18-04-2006, 10:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •