Having said that, it can't be denied that they do have some very charismatic candidates coming up in the near future. Don't agree with basically anything Rubio says, but the guy definitely has something about him.
It's a good point but the US remains by a massive distance the most important country in the world. Especially on someone with such unusual (in his party especially) foreign policy views as Paul has, if he ever got elected (which of course he wouldn't be) it would have big consequences for the rest of the world. Whether we like it or not, everyone is a stakeholder in a US election to some extent.
I think there'll sooner be another Bradman than another Warne. - Gidgeon Haigh
[Warne is] the greatest bowler ever produced in this entire world - Muttiah Muralidaran
[Warne is] the greatest bowler of all time - Glenn McGrath
In my opinion Shane Warne is the greatest cricketer who's ever lived - Ian Botham
Warne is the greatest cricketer to pick up a ball ever.
And is the greatest bowler I have ever laid eyes on. - Brian Lara
It means while Romney agrees with him on some things, he won't endorse him because they disagree on the grand majority of things. While the others toe the party line, Paul has come out and said there is little, if any, difference between the two nominees.
Rand Paul and Ron Paul are father and son but they're actually quite different in many respects. But you'd know that if you knew much about them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)