I'm guessing what Flem posted was what he was thinking at the time he read your post, meaning his post is valid for this thread.
Tsk, technicalities
I'm guessing what Flem posted was what he was thinking at the time he read your post, meaning his post is valid for this thread.
Tsk, technicalities
"All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusions is called a philosopher." - Ambrose Bierce
Langeveldt: I of course blame their parents.. and unchecked immigration!
GingerFurball: He's Austrian, they tend to produce the odd ****ed up individual
Burgey: Be careful dealing with neighbours whose cars don't have wheels but whose houses do.
Uppercut: Maybe I just need better strippers
Lol, just explaining myself. Wasn't questioning his right to post (again a technicality).
Or the kids missed off Santa's 'Nice List.'
Tragic.
Oh yeah, thats right, Obama is a man who, whether you agree with what he does or not, is expected to make tough decisions, be strong about them, and see them though. I'm sure he hates the fact innocent people are killed/injured by his decisions, but he can steel himself against that by knowing in advance, and telling himself (rightly or wrongly, thats not the issue) that its for a greater good.
However when the children killed are 'his', and not part of an ongoing conflict but an act of incomprehensable savagry, then I suppose its harder to keep his emotions in check.
Last edited by cpr; 16-12-2012 at 04:49 PM.
And drone attacks on civilians aren't an act of savagery? But that's just statistics I guess.
WWCC - Loyaulte Mi Lie
"People make me happy.. not places.. people"
"When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life." - Samuel Johnson
"Oh my God, there's a castle! A castle!"
There's no ours involved. It's machines dropping bombs. And it's not achieving anything.
Didn't say that, in fact deliberately avoided the argument of 'were the politics behind his actions right or wrong', I was just stating he has to take actions, has to think of the consequences, satisfy himself with them, and if justifiable to him/his nations overall strategic aims, take them. If innocents are hurt, he's prepared, expected, steeled himself and justified it to himself, hence no tears...... However when a random attack occurs with no tangible reason which kills innocents he is duty bound to protect, forgive him for not having his emotions in check.
Last edited by cpr; 16-12-2012 at 06:36 PM.
Must be a cold heart that always has to justify when children die as collateral. I could never do it and would always see myself as a monster if I was in that position.
he can probably justify it by reminding himself that he's the commander-in-chief, and flying killing robots that allow the US to kill their enemies without sending in any troops who might be placed in danger is worth it, children dying as collateral and all.
i mean it's pretty obvious isn't it
of course doesn't mean it's right and something has to be done about it. but yeah
Indians can't bowl - Where has the rumour come from as I myself and many indian friends arwe competent fast bowlers ?
With the English bid I said: Let us be brief. If you give back the Falkland Islands, which belong to us, you will get my vote. They then became sad and left
I can now understand why no-one bothers to fix broken headphones, despite it being a pretty simple job theoretically. Fiddly as ****.
"MTV isn't really my cup of tea... mostly because I hate huge pieces of **** in my tea." - Aziz Ansari
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)