I've watched the docu (felt as if I needed a shower afterwards) and, my own flawed and biased take was that both the (alleged, etc..) abuse victims' stories had the ring of verisimilitude.

There was an awful lot of overlap between their respective testimonies as to what got Jackson off. Clearly it's within the remit of whoever has the final edit to emphasise these, but that's still a long way from suggesting it's a hatchet job with a view to the Wacko Jacko estate's fortune.

That said I did grown inwardly when it was belatedly revealed (like 3 hours in) they'd both sought fiscal recompense after the fact. I suppose there's no reason why they wouldn't, but it gives the apologists an easy out.