Go Back   Cricket Web > Other > Off Topic



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21-06-2003, 01:10 AM   #1 (permalink)
U19 Captain
 
R_Powell_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oman
Posts: 618
The new Cricketweb Science thread

Just thought that resurrecting this thread was a good idea....

My Question:- Water Filters, three stage Reverse Osmosis? Can anybody try to explain what is meant by " Reverse Osmosis" ??
__________________
"And, when you want something, all the universe conspires in helping you to achieve it" - Paulo Coelho, The Alchemist
R_Powell_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2003, 03:50 AM   #2 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
OK, let's start with the term 'Osmosis'. This involves the passage of a solvent through a 'semi-permeable membrane' at molecular level.

Take a volume of some solid (solute, eg salt) which is dissolved in a solvent (eg water). Cover it with a semi-permeable membrane (which is a fancy name for a fine seive) and turn it upside down, plunging it into a larger volume of the same solvent (a big bucket of water) with a greater concentration of solute(salt). Dip the tube into the bucket until the levels of the liquids (in tube and bucket) coincide.

Osmosis is the phenomenon where the two volumes of solvent try to equalise each other out as far as concentration of solute (their respective saltiness) goes.

Now the semi-permeable membrane (I prefer the term 'molecular sieve') will allow the smaller water molecules through, whilst trapping the larger salt ones. The water molecules on both sides of the barrier (the membrane) are in constant motion, so there's a tendency for some to penetrate through the sieve from either direction. The salt molecules cannot - they're too large, so they inhibit the flow from the salty side to the less-salty side (block the sieve, so to speak).

Eventually, the concentration of salt in water on both sides of the barrier become equalised. The water level in the tube will slowly rise.

Incidentally, it's the reason that drinking sea water will kill you. The salty water in your stomach drags the less-salty water from the rest of your body and you de-hydrate.

Anyway, reverse-osmosis is a clever marketing use of a scientific term - like all marketing terms it's 'bad science'. The only way to REVERSE osmosis is to have lots of pressure on one side of the membrane to drive the solvent molecules through from the 'more salty' side to the 'less salty' side.

It isn't the reverse of osmosis at all. It's a pressure-sieve.

Three-stage reverse-osmosis - three sieves, each with smaller pores than the previous (down to about 4 Angstroms)

It does work, though. Cheers - enjoy the water.
__________________
Nigel Clough's Black and White Army, beating Forest away with 10 men

Last edited by luckyeddie; 21-06-2003 at 03:58 AM.
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2003, 04:02 AM   #3 (permalink)
PY
International Coach
 
PY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 10,736
Osmosis was the basis of my GCSE Biology coursework couple of years ago. Well boring.

With my basic knowledge, surely the pressure would equalise anyway after a while with the pressure-sieve idea and once pressure has equalised normal osmosis occurs.

Textbook definition of diffusion is:

"A substance moving from an area of its high concentration to an area of its low concentration through a semi-permeable membrane"

Now I remember why I dropped Biology.:rolleyes:
__________________
A True Champion - Bob. Rest in peace. 15/04/06
"People today have too big a devil and too small a God"

- Stephen Currie

"The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?" Psalm 27:1
PY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-06-2003, 04:34 AM   #4 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by PY
With my basic knowledge, surely the pressure would equalise anyway after a while with the pressure-sieve idea and once pressure has equalised normal osmosis occurs.

That's why the principle of 'reverse osmosis' is, in fact, nothing to do with osmosis at all.

The respective pressures never get a chance to equalise because the pressure on the high concentration side is kept artificially high by the use of a peristaltic pump - and the purified solvent is then 'tapped off' from the low concentration side.

The artificial pressure differential is maintained in order to resist natural osmosis.
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2003, 08:30 AM   #5 (permalink)
Soutie
 
Langeveldt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stellenbosch - South Africa
Posts: 29,336
Quote:
Originally posted by PY
Osmosis was the basis of my GCSE Biology coursework couple of years ago. Well boring.
Yeah that same coursework that ive just done..... Notes went in a big oil drum and were blown up using god knows what chemicals last night....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
Don't like using my iPod dock. Ruins battery life too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
Thanks Dick Smith. Will remember to subscribe to your newsletter for more electronic fun facts.

****.
Langeveldt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2003, 08:54 AM   #6 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by Langeveldt
Yeah that same coursework that ive just done..... Notes went in a big oil drum and were blown up using god knows what chemicals last night....
Ah, the school science lab.

Where I learnt how to make nitrogen tri-iodide.
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2003, 12:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Mr Mxyzptlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad)
Posts: 36,795
Quote:
Originally posted by PY
Textbook definition of diffusion is:

"A substance moving from an area of its high concentration to an area of its low concentration through a semi-permeable membrane"
Au contraire. Osmosis is through a semi-permeable membrane. In diffusion, such a membrane is absent.
__________________
Sreesanth said, "Next ball he was beaten and I said, 'is this the King Charles Lara? Who is this impostor, moving around nervously? I should have kept my mouth shut for the next ball - mind you, it was a length ball - Lara just pulled it over the church beyond the boundary! He is a true legend."

Mr Mxyzptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2003, 01:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
To clarify this, in Osmosis, the solute (the stuff that's dissolved') doesn't move anywhere, but the solvent does.

Diffusion is a totally different animal - and does, as has been mentioned, involve the migration of a substance through another substance (or barrier), but the standard definition given is not complete. It's not 'fluids' in the normal 'liquidy' sense, but in the 'fluid dynamics' sense. Misleading, huh?

Examples :

Gas in a tyre.
Air can 'bleed' through rubber (your tyre will lose pressure over time even if 'perfectly' sealed). This can be clearly demonstrated with a child's helium balloon. It will deflate in 5-10 days - no problem. Even the metallised ones.

Solids in polythene.
Get a polythene bag, fill it with a brightly-coloured solid like turmeric (I first noticed this phenomenon with a drug called 'Danthron' when I worked in the Pharmaceutical industry 30 years ago). Seal the bag. Leave it a couple of weeks - the outside of the polythene pag will become stained yellow and you will be able to transfer this on to your hand quite easily. I was able to demonstrate this a few years ago with saffron - but that's a bit more expensive.

Incidentally, did you know that glass is not a true solid at room temterature? Nor is pitch. Both will flow over time. A window over 100 years old is always thicker at the bottom and thinner at the top.
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2003, 04:13 PM   #9 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,336
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2003, 05:10 PM   #10 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by marc71178
Science? Boring? Never.

Oh, all right then.
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2003, 04:45 AM   #11 (permalink)
U19 Captain
 
R_Powell_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oman
Posts: 618
Another Topic:-

ESP or "Extra Sensory Perception", and the idea that all Human beings have it, but some people have better control over it, clairvoyance, telepathy....etc.
R_Powell_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2003, 05:34 AM   #12 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Mr Mxyzptlk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad)
Posts: 36,795
I don't believe in natural telepathy
Mr Mxyzptlk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2003, 06:19 AM   #13 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by R_Powell_fan
Another Topic:-

ESP or "Extra Sensory Perception", and the idea that all Human beings have it, but some people have better control over it, clairvoyance, telepathy....etc.
The James Randi Educational Foundation has put up a prize of one million dollars for ANYONE who can prove any evidence of paranormal activities.

The original prize of 10 thousand dollars was offered many years ago (at least 15) - and the standard answer from charlat sorry, clairvoyants, was that 'it wasn't worth giving up their time'.

Five years ago, the prize was increased to a million dollars.

Thus far, no-one has been able to even pass one of the preliminary tests.

I can't understand why I even bothered typing this reply out.
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2003, 06:20 AM   #14 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,336
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr Mxyzptlk
I don't believe in natural telepathy
I knew you were going to say that yesterday
marc71178 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-06-2003, 06:24 AM   #15 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
luckyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Derby, England
Posts: 17,629
Quote:
Originally posted by marc71178
I knew you were going to say that yesterday
Wait until Wednesday - I predict that DD will be claiming a million bucks
luckyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web