Just listened to the new Oasis album, it's pretty good actually, especially track 2. Anyone wanting a Definitely Maybe II will be disappointed - not that that's a bad thing.
It'll be interesting to see if it stands up to repeat listening.
Member of the Newtown Cricket Club since January '06 - "Per commissum ad taberna"
Honorary Vice-President of the "Twenty20 Is Boring Society"
How'd you find those Pulp albums, Spambo?
Fascist Dictator of the Heath Davis Appreciation Society
Supporting Petone's Finest since the very start - Iain O'Brien
Adam Wheater - Another batsman off the Essex production line
Also Supporting the All Time #1 Batsman of All Time Ever - Jacques Kallis and the much maligned Peter Siddle.
Vimes tells it how it is:
The other one has some pretty strong tracks on it though. Razzmatazz and OU are particularly good, I think. It's missing My Lighthouse though from their debut album, which is a pretty decent song - but its not worth buying the album just for that.
- As featured in The Independent.
"Predictably, the ending of his international career did not end the argument about Pietersen's merits, as an army of informed commentators and Piers Morgan weighed in to defend or attack him."
- The Guardian's Andrew Anthony
So I take it the new Oasis album has been leaked hugely, again?
Am ordering the special edition like Mr Wright. You get the album, a bonus disc of remixes with a few other songs, a 4-vinyl version, a making of DVD and a hardback book. Reckon it's worth the £50, mainly as I own a complete collection for oasis on CD and generally try and get their albums on vinyl anyway.
"I can't promise anyone success but I can promise them a trip to the moon." - John King
RIP Craigos. A true CW legend. You will be missed.
I'm an Oasis fan, but think The Shock of the Lightening is their weakest lead single from an album since, well, ever, really.
Actually, Roll With It wasn't that flash & Morning Glory was ok, so maybe it bodes well.
Roll With It wasn't the lead single, though, well not the only one anyway, as Some Might Say came first.
Was never a huge fan of Lyla but loved the last album, conversely thought Go Let It Out was awesome but SOTSOG is their worst album quite comfortably. TBH they can release what they like nowadays as I will still buy it, don't have a full collection for any other band but have imports, bootlegs, the works for oasis.
Some Might Say wasn't really the lead single for the album tho, tbf. It was included on the album, but was released about 6 months before & (I think) has the orginal drummer playing on it before he got replaced with Alan White.
Roll With It was the traditional "bung it out a coupla weeks before the LP" single.
Yeah, fair point. Never really thought of it like that as I only started listening to Oasis when Morning Glory came out (hey, I was only 11).
Sort of following on from the Oasis discussion that precedes this post, but mainly because I'm currently listening to Because Of The Times by Kings Of Leon, I thought I'd throw this thought out there. There seems to be an awful lot of groups who hit the ground running with inspired debut albums & then really struggle to live up to this early promise. Definitely Maybe is (MHO, obv) comfortably the best Oasis album (and it's probably because it caught me at just the right time that I still give them more time of day than a lot on CW seem to) & since then each of their subsequent releases has been compared to it & found wanting in said comparison. Even Don't Believe The Truth (a big return to form) was generally hailed as their best since... yadda, yadda.
Making one's best album early on isn't necessarily a new phenomenon, I'd say none of Nick Drake, Van Morrison (taking Astral Weeks as his debut proper) & The Velvet Underground surpassed their maiden releases, but their subsequent output wasn't entirely overshadowed by them, as is the case with Kings Of Leon. Youth And Young Manhood was one of those albums that makes one sit up & take notice, but BOTT & Aha Shake Heartbreak, whilst ok, pale by comparison.
Two great bands of my youth arguably had their demise hastened by great debuts; The Stone Roses dissolved into litigation & cocaine after their eponymous opener and their belated follow-up was a crushing disappointment; whilst The La's never even made a sequel to their self-titled first effort. Although, admittedly, Lee Mavers's smack habit probably didn't help either. On a smaller scale many other bands of recent vintage have made decent debuts (The Coral, The Futureheads, The Thrills & The Fratellis off the top of my head) but have never quite lived up to this early promise.
Ok, I've got to the fourth paragraph & am now panicking because I'm not sure where I'm going with this. I suppose, to attempt to turn it into a point of discussion rather than a somewhat long-winded lecture by a slightly embittered ageing music snob who begins every conversation with "Well, obviously I preferred their earlier work...", I'll ask for examples of other groups who've fallen foul of the sophomore slump & those who've avoided this curse, especially those who've made bang-up debuts and then bettered them.
Or am I just utterly wrong & is Be Here Now actually Oasis' magnum opus?
Belle and Sebastian are a pretty good example of that with Tigermilk as their finest effort. Subsequent albums have never been able to match it.
Rest In Peace Craigos
I think Doves have done well. I thought their debut was a cracker, and then they easily trumped it with The Last Broadcast and Some Cities, whilst not as good, is still a cracking listen.
Love their use of Warren Zevon's Werewolves of London as the tune to one of their B sides on There Goes the Fear (I think)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)