Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Reaction Times

  1. #1
    International Vice-Captain open365's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    liverpool
    Posts
    4,066

    Reaction Times

    What's the upper range of reaction times for humans?

    We had to do a reaction time test in Biology today in which you dropped a ruler from a point into someones open grasp for them to grab then measuring the length of the ruler where they grabbed it and converting that into a reaction time.

    It gave a list of reaction times for every cm below the grabbing point(IE, you grab it at 20 your reaction time is .202 of a second).

    If you grabbed it at 1cm(basicaly as soon as they dop it) it said that eqauled a reaction time of 0.0048 of a second.

    As many people managed to acheive that(some more than once even) i contested that a reaction time of .0048 of a second is impossible and so anything less than a certain point would be an innaccurate result as the person grabbing would basicaly have guessed when it was going to be dropped taking reaction time out of the equation.

    He said i was wrong, and that .0048 is possible by a human.

    Who's right?

  2. #2
    Cricketer Of The Year Adamc's Avatar
    Chicken Champion! Battle Pong Champion!
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    in the wind, so to speak
    Posts
    9,129
    I think 0.048 would be theoretically possible, but you wouldn't be able to determine it from that test. If it was happening often I'd say you're right in thinking that it was due to people anticipating when it would be dropped rather than a genuine reaction. It doesn't sound like a particularly scientific test.

    Try something like this and I think it'd be exceedingly difficult to get 0.1 or less.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbo...n_version5.swf

  3. #3
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,852
    You. 1/200 of a second is utterly ridiculous. I think the lower bound is approximately 0.2.
    MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
    CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
    ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?

    Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC

    Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog

  4. #4
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Adamc View Post
    I think 0.048 would be theoretically possible, but you wouldn't be able to determine it from that test. If it was happening often I'd say you're right in thinking that it was due to people anticipating when it would be dropped rather than a genuine reaction. It doesn't sound like a particularly scientific test.

    Try something like this and I think it'd be exceedingly difficult to get 0.1 or less.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/humanbo...n_version5.swf
    The claim isn't 0.048. It's 0.0048!


  5. #5
    International Coach
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,324
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup View Post
    You. 1/200 of a second is utterly ridiculous. I think the lower bound is approximately 0.2.
    Less than that, we did reaction times as our Stats coursework and several people got under that, and that was three years ago. Suppose reaction times improve with age.
    MSN - tomhalsey123@hotmail.com

    Manchester United FC: 20 Times

    R.I.P. Sledger's Signature, 2004-2008

  6. #6
    Cricketer Of The Year Adamc's Avatar
    Chicken Champion! Battle Pong Champion!
    Tournaments Won: 1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    in the wind, so to speak
    Posts
    9,129
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup
    The claim isn't 0.048. It's 0.0048!
    Oh, right. Yeah, sounds impossible then.

  7. #7
    In athletics it's a false start if your 'reaction time' is less than 0.1 seconds (which presumably is impossible without anticipation etc.) and generally the times are usually between 0.1 and 0.2.
    National Scrabble Champion 2009, 8th, 11th and 5th in 2009/2011/2013 World Championships, gold medal (team) at Causeway, 2011 Masters Champion
    Australia’s Darren Lehmann is a ‘blatant loser’ insists Stuart Broad
    Countdown Series 57 Champion
    King of the Arcade
    Reply from mods to my prank bans in public:
    Reply from mods to my prank bans in private:


    MSN - evil_budgie @ hotmail.co.uk

  8. #8
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Samuel_Vimes's Avatar
    Defend Your Castle Champion! Monkey Diving Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bonn, BRD
    Posts
    22,850
    The reaction time in this case isn't from "you see ruler moving", it's from "you see person moving muscles to get ready for ruler moving".

    Might not be such a big difference, but if you can predict when the other guy's gonna drop the ruler (and there is a delay between someone moving their hands and the ruler actually moving, due to friction), then obviously you have a fairly useful chance of lowering your "reaction time".
    Messi scores on the rebound.

    Founder of ESAS - Edgar Schiferli, the best associate bowler
    A follower of the schools of Machiavelli, Bentham, Locke, Hobbes, Sutcliffe, Bradman, Lindwall, Miller, Hassett and Benaud
    Member of JMAS, DMAS, FRAS and RTDAS

    Quote Originally Posted by Adolf Grünbaum
    Is the conduct approved by the gods right ("pious"), because of properties of its own, or merely because it pleases the gods to value or command it?

  9. #9
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,852
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup View Post
    The claim isn't 0.048. It's 0.0048!
    Wiki: "Simple reaction time is the time it takes to react to stimuli. The average human's reaction time falls somewhere between 200 and 270 milliseconds, although athletes and others who train themselves can achieve reaction times approaching 150 milliseconds"

  10. #10
    International Coach
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    13,324
    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Pickup View Post
    Wiki: "Simple reaction time is the time it takes to react to stimuli. The average human's reaction time falls somewhere between 200 and 270 milliseconds, although athletes and others who train themselves can achieve reaction times approaching 150 milliseconds"
    Wouldn't trust Wiki tbh, from experience the average adult human's reaction time would be a fair bit under that, and our testing method was totally unpredictable.

  11. #11
    PY
    PY is offline
    International Coach PY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Midlands, UK
    Posts
    10,736
    That reliable source which gets you marks taken off you if you reference it in any of your courseworks.
    A True Champion - Bob. Rest in peace. 15/04/06
    "People today have too big a devil and too small a God"

    - Stephen Currie

    "The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The Lord is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?" Psalm 27:1

  12. #12
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Samuel_Vimes's Avatar
    Defend Your Castle Champion! Monkey Diving Champion!
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Bonn, BRD
    Posts
    22,850
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Halsey View Post
    Wouldn't trust Wiki tbh, from experience the average adult human's reaction time would be a fair bit under that, and our testing method was totally unpredictable.
    Especially as the article he quoted was one listing as "needing citation".

    However, it did link to a rather interesting bunch of stats based on this test, which looks equally unpredictable.

  13. #13
    Cricket Web Staff Member / Global Moderator Neil Pickup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    26,852
    I averaged 210-215ms.

  14. #14
    Soutie Langeveldt's Avatar
    Pinball Champion!
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    29,542
    Quote Originally Posted by PY View Post
    That reliable source which gets you marks taken off you if you reference it in any of your courseworks.
    Is it? Haha, we still get to use it, although politics has banned us from referencing from Wiki..
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    Don't like using my iPod dock. Ruins battery life too much.
    Quote Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
    Thanks Dick Smith. Will remember to subscribe to your newsletter for more electronic fun facts.

    ****.

  15. #15
    Hall of Fame Member age_master's Avatar
    Plasmanaut on Fire Champion!
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Sydney, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    15,777
    Average male reacution times are supposed to be between 0.2 and 0.3 seconds, average female is slightly higher from memory maybe 0.25 - 0.35.
    Member of CW Green
    Kerry O'Keefe - Worlds funniest Commentator

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 58
    Last Post: 06-09-2009, 04:15 AM
  2. How many times do you sneeze in a day?
    By yaju in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 20-10-2006, 06:02 AM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-04-2005, 06:57 AM
  4. "The Times" England versus Rest of World teams
    By aussie_beater in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 24-07-2002, 07:48 PM
  5. 100m times
    By FrontierPsychiartrist in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 16-05-2002, 01:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •