What do you look like? Pt III - Page 99

Pratters · 29-06-2007, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

That post was in jest, TBH. I have no clue about Aseem's innocence or otherwise.

Richard.. you are a ****.

roseboy64 · 29-06-2007, 05:02 PM

Didn't pick that up sorry. @ Richard

Pup Clarke · 29-06-2007, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pratyush

Richard.. you are a ****.

Can't both of you ******* get on with each other for god's sake?. What the **** do personal insults achieve?.

Pratters · 29-06-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pup Clarke

Can't both of you ******* get on with each other for god's sake?. What the **** do personal insults achieve?.

That post was in jest, TBH. I have no clue about Richard's ****iness or otherwise.

Pup Clarke · 29-06-2007, 05:10 PM

So saying someone's a **** is meant to be in jest is it?.

Pratters · 29-06-2007, 05:11 PM

I was just proving the logical fallacy in Richard's line of action. He posts some thing roll eyes worthy. Asks why it is roll eyes worthy. When he is shown why it is, he says his post was in jest. You can get away with any thing if you go by that line. Just dire.

Richard · 29-06-2007, 05:13 PM

Well... it was in jest. It might have appeared not in jest, which is forgiveable. If it hadn't been in jest, it would have been Rolleyes-worthy.

Anyway... panic over.

Pup Clarke · 29-06-2007, 05:14 PM

Richard, I think it's best if you stop making as many "in jest" posts. Things can easily be taken the wrong way and fights can break out.

Richard · 29-06-2007, 05:15 PM

Is easier said than done.

Pratters · 29-06-2007, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard

Well... it was in jest. It might have appeared not in jest, which is forgiveable. If it hadn't been in jest, it would have been Rolleyes-worthy.

Anyway... panic over.

Then maybe you should have explained the same instead of asking a stupid question and then saying your post was in jest. That you did leave enough room for suspicion - which some one should not leave. Else people will rightly interpret your posts as they deem fit.

Anyway... panic over.

Turbinator · 29-06-2007, 05:20 PM

Haha this is pretty entertaining. And it all started because I complimented (

) Piper.

Richard · 29-06-2007, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pratyush

Then maybe you should have explained the same instead of asking a stupid question and then saying your post was in jest. That you did leave enough room for suspicion - which some one should not leave that your post was not in jest.

Anyway... panic over.

Indeed I shouldn't. It was a mistake on my part, arising from the simple fact that it was obvious to me that the post was in jest. I haven't a clue how many others did\would have spotted it but anyway... as I say, kinda needless bickering this.

Turbinator · 29-06-2007, 05:25 PM

Okay now I want both you ladies to make up and be friends again......... While I give my hands some exercise

!

Matteh · 29-06-2007, 05:27 PM

Jeez, kids.

Close this one and move onto Part IV if you can't play nicely.

Fiery · 29-06-2007, 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turbinator

Okay now I want both you ladies to make up and be friends again......... While I give my hands some exercise

!

29-06-2007, 05:02 PM	#1472 (permalink)
roseboy64 Cricket Web Content Updater Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Jamaica Posts: 18,549	Didn't pick that up sorry. @ Richard __________________ Sir Alexander Chapman Ferguson = Greatest Ever Manager "One from ten leaves zero." - Eric Williams, former T&T PM Member of Cricket Web Green Member of Northside Power R.I.P Fardin Qayyumi

29-06-2007, 05:20 PM	#1481 (permalink)
Turbinator International Captain Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto Posts: 7,492	Haha this is pretty entertaining. And it all started because I complimented () Piper.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

29-06-2007, 05:10 PM	#1475 (permalink)
Pup Clarke International Captain Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Glasgow Posts: 5,983	So saying someone's a **** is meant to be in jest is it?.

29-06-2007, 05:11 PM	#1476 (permalink)
Pratters Banned Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Kolkata, India Posts: 20,794	I was just proving the logical fallacy in Richard's line of action. He posts some thing roll eyes worthy. Asks why it is roll eyes worthy. When he is shown why it is, he says his post was in jest. You can get away with any thing if you go by that line. Just dire.

29-06-2007, 05:14 PM	#1478 (permalink)
Pup Clarke International Captain Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Glasgow Posts: 5,983	Richard, I think it's best if you stop making as many "in jest" posts. Things can easily be taken the wrong way and fights can break out.

29-06-2007, 05:15 PM	#1479 (permalink)
Richard Cricket Web Staff Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: 2005 Posts: 80,407	Is easier said than done.

29-06-2007, 05:25 PM	#1483 (permalink)
Turbinator International Captain Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Toronto Posts: 7,492	Okay now I want both you ladies to make up and be friends again......... While I give my hands some exercise !

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)