![]() |
The Battle of the Philosophers - Plato vs Socrates vs Aristotle
I feel Aristotle had some great points about anger, and how if it is used constructively, we can use effectively. However, Anger does limit our ability to reason, limiting our abilities to make rational decisions. Thats well worth noting. Although without anger, our minds are defenceless. So anger can be good, but only to certain extent can anger be good. This point was a pretty good one made by Aristotle. I wonder if Simon "Fitzy" Fitzsimmons has ever considered this when jumping to conclusions all the time. People have actually compared me to Aristotle in the past. So if people would like to call me Aristotle, which I'm pretty some would have considered at some stage in forum life, by all means, do.
|
Quote:
|
Nibbs, I think you're more like Jack from Will & Grace than Aristotle...
|
in hindsight, a more appropriate title to this thread would have been The Battle of the Philosophers - Plato vs Socrates vs Aristotle vs Nibbs
|
Quote:
|
I have a BA in Philosophy as it goes (joint honours with Sociology).
Can remember absolutely jack-all about it now, mind. |
Schopenhauer owns them all
<smug mode off> not a clue what he's about, actually. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Usual UK uni experience. :p |
although boybrumby's buffoonerry threatens to ruin this battle, i think i'll rate this one 5 stars
|
Disapponited at the lack of russian philosophers up for discussion tbh.
|
Quote:
|
To be honest I'd have Gump over the lot of them, he says some very wise things that man.
|
No way. Not Gump.
I'd rather go Hilton. "They liked it because they didn't know it was me". A wealth of warped ideologies and ehtics to chew over for all eternity |
Plato was the guy who got killed when a bird saw his head, thought it was a rock, and dropped an egg on it to let the kids out..
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 PM. |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web