What good would it do abolishing the governmental green schemes and replacing them with a $9/tonne carbon tax if that still falls well short of any meaningful action on climate change, assuming that Ross Garnaut's suggestion of $26/tonne is an appropriate level for the tax to start at? All that would do is iron out the inefficiencies of the schemes themselves without actually addressing climate change at all. If you're going to have an inappropriate level for the tax you're probably better off not having one at all (though I suspect you aren't going to disagree with that particular alternative).


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
