Paedophile Political Party - Page 3

Mr Casson · 01-06-2006, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matteh

The free train-travel thing gets me....

Lets state about how we're going to make loads of laws that are basically all sex related, and actually you know what, how much did you pay to get here on the train?

Maybe there aren't any primary schools in that train zone.

benchmark00 · 01-06-2006, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Casson

Maybe there aren't any primary schools in that train zone.

Immature attitude for mine...

Mr Casson · 01-06-2006, 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benchmark00

Immature attitude for mine...

Sorry... but just like over in the N'lands, I can't help it when they're ripe for the picking.

benchmark00 · 01-06-2006, 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr Casson

Sorry... but just like over in the N'lands, I can't help it when they're ripe for the picking.

Sheeze, i'm being schooled over here...

Smudge · 01-06-2006, 06:51 AM

Here, let me help you, benchy.

Just let it be our little secret.

roseboy64 · 01-06-2006, 09:56 AM

I'm guessing they're trying to win the public vote with the free train travel.

steds · 01-06-2006, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roseboy64

I'm guessing they're trying to win the public vote with the free train travel.

Xavier "Columbo" Rose.

benchmark00 · 01-06-2006, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by steds

Xavier "Columbo" Rose.

Hahahaha. Good line.

sledger · 01-06-2006, 04:02 PM

hes no colombo, hes not even kojak, hell hes not even quincy.

roseboy64 · 01-06-2006, 05:03 PM

Quincy?

sledger · 01-06-2006, 05:09 PM

read it and weep fella, another post under 3 words, rollin em in.

roseboy64 · 01-06-2006, 05:11 PM

Like I said, simplicity.

Shounak · 01-06-2006, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by roseboy64

Like I said, simplicity.

Pot plant

FaaipDeOiad · 01-06-2006, 07:03 PM

Without wanting to be too on-topic or controversial, I actually think there's a valid argument for both lowering the age of consent, and changing the emphasis of punishment in combatting child ****ography.

Obviously actual child abuse is a crime of the highest order and should be treated as such, but there's a level of absurdity in the suggestion that a 15 year old is not reasonably capable of making the decision to have a consentual sexual relationship, in many cases at least. The lowering of the age of consent to a level where there was more certainty about the criminal nature of the act (say 12, for instance) is a reasonable suggestion, and of course when something falls into the grey area and does not involve actual consent, action can still be taken.

At the very least, the suggestion that there should be more flexibility in the law is a good one, though I don't think it warrants its own political party, or necessarily a great deal of political attention at all. It's a fringe issue, but a valid one, and this lot and associated freaks like NAMBLA are not the only ones who have raised it. Solid arguments also come from more reputable sources.

As far as child ****ography goes, my main issue lies in the fact that someone can (as I understand it) be criminally prosecuted for simply possessing illegal material. If you compare it to, say, a snuff film (where someone is killed), the suggestion that someone who purchased or downloaded such a film was a criminal who was supporting murder is somewhat absurd, while obviously the person who did the killing could indeed have been a murderer. The same thing goes for child ****ography. Someone who purchases it might well be royally ****ed in the head, but I don't think they are necessarily a criminal, while someone who produces it certainly is. Arresting someone for owning something that someone else made illegally is the wrong way to go about it, even if it might be practically effective at slowing the industry. At the very least, I don't think it should be an issue worthy of criminal prosecution, or considered a sex crime.

The bestiality and free train travel things are beyond the pale, however.

NZTailender · 01-06-2006, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad

NAMBLA are not the only ones who have raised it.

What's Marlon Brando got to do with this?

01-06-2006, 06:51 AM	#35 (permalink)
Smudge Hall of Fame Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Wellywood Posts: 16,552	Here, let me help you, benchy. Just let it be our little secret. __________________ What do you mean?

01-06-2006, 09:56 AM	#36 (permalink)
roseboy64 Cricket Web Content Updater Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Jamaica Posts: 18,549	I'm guessing they're trying to win the public vote with the free train travel. __________________ Sir Alexander Chapman Ferguson = Greatest Ever Manager "One from ten leaves zero." - Eric Williams, former T&T PM Member of Cricket Web Green Member of Northside Power R.I.P Fardin Qayyumi

01-06-2006, 07:03 PM	#44 (permalink)
FaaipDeOiad Hall of Fame Member Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Australia Posts: 18,682	Without wanting to be too on-topic or controversial, I actually think there's a valid argument for both lowering the age of consent, and changing the emphasis of punishment in combatting child **ography. Obviously actual child abuse is a crime of the highest order and should be treated as such, but there's a level of absurdity in the suggestion that a 15 year old is not reasonably capable of making the decision to have a consentual sexual relationship, in many cases at least. The lowering of the age of consent to a level where there was more certainty about the criminal nature of the act (say 12, for instance) is a reasonable suggestion, and of course when something falls into the grey area and does not involve actual consent, action can still be taken. At the very least, the suggestion that there should be more flexibility in the law is a good one, though I don't think it warrants its own political party, or necessarily a great deal of political attention at all. It's a fringe issue, but a valid one, and this lot and associated freaks like NAMBLA are not the only ones who have raised it. Solid arguments also come from more reputable sources. As far as child ography goes, my main issue lies in the fact that someone can (as I understand it) be criminally prosecuted for simply possessing illegal material. If you compare it to, say, a snuff film (where someone is killed), the suggestion that someone who purchased or downloaded such a film was a criminal who was supporting murder is somewhat absurd, while obviously the person who did the killing could indeed have been a murderer. The same thing goes for child ography. Someone who purchases it might well be royally **ed in the head, but I don't think they are necessarily a criminal, while someone who produces it certainly is. Arresting someone for owning something that someone else made illegally is the wrong way to go about it, even if it might be practically effective at slowing the industry. At the very least, I don't think it should be an issue worthy of criminal prosecution, or considered a sex crime. The bestiality and free train travel things are beyond the pale, however. __________________ I know a place where a royal flush Can never beat a pair

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The Political Compass Test	Neil Pickup	Off Topic	635	10-04-2013 04:37 AM
Compulsory Moving on of Political Leaders, a la USA	vic_orthdox	Off Topic	44	14-05-2006 11:11 PM
Political Correctness	Slow Love™	Off Topic	41	17-11-2005 06:31 AM
Political stance?	sledger	Off Topic	125	11-10-2005 03:43 PM
Get ready to cry: Official CricketWeb Jokes Thread!	yaju	Off Topic	84	08-08-2004 12:50 PM

01-06-2006, 04:02 PM	#39 (permalink)
sledger Spanish_Vicente Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: cricsim, lol Posts: 28,161	hes no colombo, hes not even kojak, hell hes not even quincy.

01-06-2006, 05:03 PM	#40 (permalink)
roseboy64 Cricket Web Content Updater Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Jamaica Posts: 18,549	Quincy?

01-06-2006, 05:09 PM	#41 (permalink)
sledger Spanish_Vicente Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: cricsim, lol Posts: 28,161	read it and weep fella, another post under 3 words, rollin em in.

01-06-2006, 05:11 PM	#42 (permalink)
roseboy64 Cricket Web Content Updater Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Jamaica Posts: 18,549	Like I said, simplicity.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)