Cricket Betting Site Betway
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37

Thread: RIP Lloyd Fouracre

  1. #16
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    63,045
    Quote Originally Posted by PommieMacGill
    This is not Europe. UK and Ireland have a "pub culture", the majority of Europe does not. Shorter pub opening hours would help... not longer.
    Shorter hours would mean people try to drink even more quickly than they do now.
    marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

    Anyone want to join the Society?

    Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.

  2. #17
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend _Ed_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Marsden Bay, NZ
    Posts
    23,786
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178
    Shorter hours would mean people try to drink even more quickly than they do now.
    True, like the days of the "six o'clock swill" here in NZ when they closed at 6pm many years ago.

  3. #18
    World Traveller Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
    Posts
    34,127
    Absolute farcial herw what has happened.

    I don't know but everybody seems to have a chip on their shoulder (that said I can say I tend to have at least one myself) and want to fight and what Sean said is correct.

    Maybe people need a lot more disapline in their lifes or need good anger management (despite the fact I get angry fairly quickly I feel as though I can control my temper when I have too).
    Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever...

    RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW

    Quote Originally Posted by Boobidy View Post
    Bradman never had to face quicks like Sharma and Irfan Pathan. He wouldn't of lasted a ball against those 2, not to mention a spinner like Sehwag.

  4. #19
    World Traveller Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
    Posts
    34,127
    Also over here there was a street brawl down in the sourthern part of the Gold Coast ( as the 6th largest city in Australia it is a far way down) involving 30 teenagers and they include firearms, baseball bats, and hammers.

    Then two and a half hours later police were called to another brawl at a pub in Burleigh (again in the sourthern part) where this time 40 people were invloved included pool cues, glasses, and bar stools.

    And this was either last night or the night before.


  5. #20
    State Regular PommieMacGill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Leicestershire, England
    Posts
    908
    Quote Originally Posted by marc71178
    Shorter hours would mean people try to drink even more quickly than they do now.
    Well, I'm certainly against 24 hour pubs. I most certainly don't want to see drunken idiots wandering about town centre's at 9am in the morning.
    PommieMacGill.

    “Everyday life is only an illusion behind which lies the reality of dreams." - Werner Herzog

    Friedrich Nietzsche | Werner Herzog | Joy Division | Ludovico Einaudi | History | Peep Show

  6. #21
    Eyes not spreadsheets marc71178's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    England
    Posts
    63,045
    You get that anyway though.

  7. #22
    Soutie Langeveldt's Avatar
    Pinball Champion!
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    Posts
    29,567
    Well just been to put some flowers down, its all pretty horrific, loads of teenagers crying their eyes out around town today..

    Word has it that all four suspects were on ASBO's and were in the area specifically to beat someone up from that party, and Lloyd happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time..

    Twelve and a half years is the likely figure being banded around.. Although its somewhat insensitive to be discussing it at the moment, isn't that just sick?
    Quote Originally Posted by vic_orthdox View Post
    Don't like using my iPod dock. Ruins battery life too much.
    Quote Originally Posted by benchmark00 View Post
    Thanks Dick Smith. Will remember to subscribe to your newsletter for more electronic fun facts.

    ****.

  8. #23
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Langeveldt
    Twelve and a half years is the likely figure being banded around.. Although its somewhat insensitive to be discussing it at the moment, isn't that just sick?
    Why? 12 and a half years is really quite a lengthy sentence for what I assume (without knowing the specifics of the story of course) would be classed as an accidental death resulting from a fight.
    It's cold on the outside they say
    But the cold leaves you clear while the heat leaves a haze

  9. #24
    Soutie Langeveldt's Avatar
    Pinball Champion!
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Leeuwarden, Netherlands
    Posts
    29,567
    Quote Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
    Why? 12 and a half years is really quite a lengthy sentence for what I assume (without knowing the specifics of the story of course) would be classed as an accidental death resulting from a fight.
    Oh, in my book its murder.. Having heard the details I can't see how its accidental..

    I guess I'm no hotshot when it comes to legal terminology, but how can you "accidentaly" kill someone in a fight? Surely the only accidental route is manslaughter (which this obviously isn't)
    Last edited by Langeveldt; 26-09-2005 at 09:10 AM.

  10. #25
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Langeveldt
    Oh, in my book its murder.. Having heard the details I can't see how its accidental..

    I guess I'm no hotshot when it comes to legal terminology, but how can you "accidentaly" kill someone in a fight? Surely the only accidental route is manslaughter (which this obviously isn't)
    Yeah, manslaughter would be what we're talking about, or negligence causing death. You accidentally kill someone in a fight like this...

    I'm in a fight with you, punch you, and you fall down and hit your head on the ground and die. My intent was not to kill you, nor was it premeditated assuming the fight was a spontaneous thing, which pretty much fills out a textbook manslaughter case. The intent has to be put through the reasonable person test as well, which basically means that if a reasonable person in the same situation would have expected the victim to die, it might indeed be murder. So, if I pummelled you about the head with a crowbar for 15 minutes, I probably should have realised you might die, but if I just pushed you over I probably wouldn't have.

    That's basically what it comes down to, and without knowing the specifics of the case it's impossible to say, but if it was indeed a spontaneous fight and the death couldn't have been reasonably expected by what the perpetrator did, manslaughter seems fair enough and 12 and a half years is quite a tough penalty. All sorts of things will come into it including the brutality of the attack, whether or not weapons were used, how many people were involved and so on. Even if it is counted as un-premeditated murder, 12 and a half years is a fairly significant penalty, and I'd be surprised if anyone got a longer sentence than that for a similar crime in the past. You have to remember that the legal system has a responsibility not just to punish offenders, but to ensure that all offenders who commit comparable offences get comparable punishments. You can't just give someone a really tough penalty to make an example of them when it's twice as harsh as what someone in the same situation would normally get, as Australia found out recently with a particularly notorious gang rape case in NSW where the offenders got massive sentences in excess of 50 years, which have of course been hugely reduced on appeal.
    Last edited by FaaipDeOiad; 26-09-2005 at 10:03 AM.

  11. #26
    World Traveller Craig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
    Posts
    34,127
    But how long would they get out via parole (if the parole board let them out that is)?

    One thing though is that I hope they don't give them a clean state and send them somewhere else to live with new names and details? What is the point in that? You do the crime and the time, everybody should no about and can see who the cowards are.

  12. #27
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Quote Originally Posted by Craig
    But how long would they get out via parole (if the parole board let them out that is)?

    One thing though is that I hope they don't give them a clean state and send them somewhere else to live with new names and details? What is the point in that? You do the crime and the time, everybody should no about and can see who the cowards are.
    I'm actually not certain how parole works in England... I assume there would be a non-parole period after which it would depend on the circumstances, as it usually does.

    As far as publicising the names of former criminals, I entirely disagree. Let's assume someone commits a horrible crime, and the justice system determines that X number of years is a fair punishment. They spend that many years in prison, and come out reformed and interested in trying to piece their life back together. Why should they be forced to deal with vigilantes harassing them, employers refusing to employ them etc?

    Prison has a purpose. That purpose is partly to punish and partly to keep dangerous elements away from society, but it's also designed to reform criminals. If it doesn't, there's no point in it at all. While we have a legal system based around the concept of reforming criminals, it's ludicrous to completely ruin the lives of ex-criminals who have done their time and been released from prison. They will already have probationary periods to deal with, probably terms of parole and so on, and if they ever commit a crime again their previous acts will count against them. That's more than enough, because if you release a former criminal from prison and simultaneously ruin any chance they might have of becoming decent, law-abiding citizens, there's no point in releasing them at all because they will almost certainly revert to criminal behaviour.

  13. #28
    Cricket Web: All-Time Legend andyc's Avatar
    Yeti Sports 1.5 Champion!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    23,883
    Quote Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad
    Why? 12 and a half years is really quite a lengthy sentence for what I assume (without knowing the specifics of the story of course) would be classed as an accidental death resulting from a fight.
    But four people on one isn't a fight.
    Quote Originally Posted by flibbertyjibber View Post
    Only a bunch of convicts having been beaten 3-0 and gone 9 tests without a win and won just 1 in 11 against England could go into the home series saying they will win. England will win in Australia again this winter as they are a better side which they have shown this summer. 3-0 doesn't lie girls.

  14. #29
    Hall of Fame Member FaaipDeOiad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19,957
    Quote Originally Posted by andyc
    But four people on one isn't a fight.
    It can be, depending on the circumstances. However, I think if it was just a normal one on one argument which developed into a fight and someone accidentally died, we'd be seeing much less than 12 and a half on the table. I know of cases like that in Australia where it was a total accident and people have got 2 years or so. Obviously this is a more serious offence.

    12 and a half years is a large manslaughter sentence or a fairly average non pre-meditated murder sentence. Keep in mind the standard "life" sentence in Australia, which is usually reserved for particularly brutal pre-meditated murders is 25 years. 12 and a half for a crime in which the intent was probably not to cause death is not an insignificant punishment. Whether or not it ends up as something like that probably depends on the details as it comes out, but I gather all we are talking about here is initial estimations, and 12.5 isn't an especially low one. Either way, it's definately too early to judge. I think there'll probably be a fair amount of media pressure if it's a high profile case, which often results in an unusually harsh sentence which will probably come down on appeal, and then people will start railing against the appeals court etc for being too lenient, as with the rape case I mentioned in Australia. It makes much more sense to give a sensible punishment in the first place.

  15. #30
    International Captain Slow Love™'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    6,080
    I don't know much about this case, it sounds quite sad. I have no idea whether it's alcohol-related or not.

    But while the roots of a lot of violent behaviour will certainly be largely social, this doesn't mean, as Faaip put it, that alcohol is an excuse and never an instigator of violent behaviour.

    I also don't think it's true to say that alcohol doesn't make people do something they wouldn't do otherwise. While there are certainly those without a violent bone in their body who will never exhibit much capacity for violence, drunk or sober, there are plenty of people out there who are completely non-violent when not intoxicated, whose behaviour changes quite radically with heavy drinking. (I would also say that if you think drinking won't make you do a variety of things you ordinarily wouldn't, you clearly haven't gotten blotto enough to properly test this scenario. ).

    Yes, it can be argued that if violence occurs, some tendency is already there for violent behaviour - that's obvious. But it's not very useful (or practical) to point this out when alcohol lowers inhibitions and controls enough to bring that kind of behaviour to the surface in otherwise non-violent people.

    For this reason, policing consumption of alcohol and educating people as to responsible use is one important part of dealing with teen/adolescent street violence in particular. And these problems are definitely frequently associated (which is not to imply that violence only occurs with alcohol).

    Aside from this, violent crimes for the sake of sheer enjoyment of violence (which, from what Langeveldt said, seems to be the case here) has to be one of the least forgivable crimes. The only mitigating factor here is the ages of the perpetrators - there's a difference between committing such a crime as a juvenile, and committing it as a developed adult (which tends to be rarer). Other than that, I have very little sympathy for a perpetrator of a violent act that gets 10 years plus in prison, for beating somebody to death as a leisure activity. Having said this, you'd be lucky to get this much of a sentence in general, so I wouldn't go around complaining that it's too light.

    The solutions (or at least, ways in which these kinds of crimes can be reduced) to this behaviour IMO have less to do with pop culture (which most definitely includes film, tv and music as well as sport) than with having meaningful roles for adolescents/teens in society and unhealthy age seperation at schools. And in many cases, a culture of over-consumption of alcohol.
    "Youre known for having a liking for men who look like women."
    - Linda

    "FFS I'm sick and tired of having to see a bloke bend over to pick something up or lean over and see their arse crack. For christ's sake pull your pants up or buy some underpants you bogan because nobody want's to see it. And this is a boat building shed (well one of them) not a porn studio."
    - Craig

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nasser Hussain comments
    By Craig in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 19-01-2007, 07:49 AM
  2. Bucknor should umpire ashes series
    By Scallywag in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 07-02-2005, 12:18 PM
  3. Is it personal?
    By wahindiawah in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 17-11-2004, 03:47 PM
  4. David Lloyd: Mad or Not?
    By Rich2001 in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 29-04-2003, 02:11 AM
  5. Lehmann's outburst
    By Slats4ever in forum Cricket Chat
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 24-01-2003, 07:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •