And if I were the tax geek I would say do it yourself.Originally Posted by marc71178
I'm stumped.Originally Posted by aussie
Thanks. I am great!
It looks pretty simple to me actually.
Just looks like substitution. The last one was a bit trickier (the unknown one) but it just involved fidding around with the equation to change the subject.
Rejecting 'analysis by checklist' and 'skill absolutism' since Dec '09
Rejecting 'selection deontology' since Mar '15
'Stats' is not a synonym for 'Career Test Averages'
Originally Posted by Jeffrey Tucker
Is this right? Cos I got totally different answers ... maybe I am on the wrong wavelength. It was hard to decipher what Aussie meant though. Too bad he's not here to clarify ...Originally Posted by Paid The Umpire
Yeah... I got -9 for the first one...Originally Posted by burkey_1988
My answers:Originally Posted by aussie
D: (1) -15
Maths experts, am I correct?
Woah, I have no idea what's going on.
D) 1. -15
3. X = (3+4y)/(2-y)
R.I.P Fardin Qayyumi (Cricket Player)
'Last one on drugs is a queer,' yells portillo..
Hope is a good thing, maybe even the best of things. And no good thing ever dies......
Self appointed president of the KPPAS
Isn't D (2) X=-4 ... to be undefined to denominator has to be zero. Therefore, when X = -4 the denominator is zero
Yep - 75 in Macro and 100 in Micro (and 61 in French) - average of 78.25 and well on for a good firstOriginally Posted by twctopcat
MSN Messenger: minardineil2000 at hotmail dot com | AAAS Chairman
CricketWeb Black | CricketWeb XI Captain
ClarkeWatch: We're Watching Rikki - Are You?
Up The Grecians - Exeter City FC
Completing the Square: My Cricket Web Blog
how long is aussie banned for ?
100 in micro, my mate got in the 90's and i thought he was good! Fair play!Originally Posted by Neil Pickup
No, the tax geeks actually enjoy it!Originally Posted by Craig
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!
Anyone want to join the Society?
Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
I can confirm that Burkey is right on all counts.
Basically what it means is:
To calculate H given a set value of X, just do: (2x-3)/(x+4)
If X=-3, then H=(-9)/(1) = -9
If X=0.5, then H=(-2)/(-4.5) = -0.44 or -4/9
If X=5, then H=(7)/(9) = 0.78 or 7/9
For the next part, you need (2x-3)/(x+4) to equal three.
Multiplying both sides by (x+4) gives you (2x-3) = 3(x+4)
Expansion gives 2x-3 = 3x+12
Collecting like terms gives you x=-15
The last part is the easiest. For a fraction to be undefined, the bottom (denominator) has to be zero. So... (x+4) = 0 - and x = -4
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)