Go Back   Cricket Web > Archived Forums > Archived Forums > ICC Champions Trophy 2006



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2006, 01:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Cricket Web Owner
 
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 22,299
Qualifying Round - Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe

For discussion around the qualifying round which consists of Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh and Zimbabwe.
__________________
Email - james.nixon@cricketweb.net
Moderators - moderators@cricketweb.net (will go to all moderators)
Skype - nixonja@hotmail.com
Google Talk/Facebook - cricketweb@gmail.com
James is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 01:59 AM   #2 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
JASON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At Work
Posts: 7,558
Does anyone know how long before the game starts ?
JASON is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 02:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Cricket Web Owner
 
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 22,299
60 minutes, 10pm New Zealand time.
James is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 02:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
JASON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: At Work
Posts: 7,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by James
60 minutes, 10pm New Zealand time.
Thanks James.

I hope Bangladesh put up a good show . A loss to either team would mean they cannot afford to lose again during the remaining qualifiers.
JASON is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 03:29 AM   #5 (permalink)
Global Moderator
 
nightprowler10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Madhouse on Madison
Posts: 13,389
SRL 26/0 after 6 overs. Morataza is bowling well whereas Rasel is leaking runs all over the place.
__________________
Can't decide on a signature? Why not Zoidberg?

(\/) (;,,;) (\/)

RIP Craigos
nightprowler10 is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 05:38 AM   #6 (permalink)
International Regular
 
oz_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,977
SL comfortable at 212/3 after 37 overs. Should be looking to set Bangladesh a target of 280+.
oz_fan is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 05:41 AM   #7 (permalink)
International Captain
 
LongHopCassidy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: www.edcowan.com
Posts: 5,060
They'll make 330, you mark my words.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by howardj View Post
A bloke you'd want to go into the trenches with and have a grog with.

A grog in the trenches.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaaipDeOiad View Post
You actually are John Howard, aren't you?
RIP Fardin Qayyumi and Craig Walsh - true icons of CricketWeb.
LongHopCassidy is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:08 AM   #8 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
TT Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: .
Posts: 16,321
Upul Tharanga’s fifth century in ODI cricket, guys only played thirty odd games, very impressive.
TT Boy is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:13 AM   #9 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
TT Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: .
Posts: 16,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by LongHopCassidy
They'll make 330, you mark my words.
I’ll doubt it now but two hundred would have probably been enough on this wicket for this opposition.
TT Boy is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
International Captain
 
LongHopCassidy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: www.edcowan.com
Posts: 5,060
302 in the end. I'd like to see some fireworks from the Bangers instead of three quick wickets, and crawling to 8-190.
LongHopCassidy is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:46 AM   #11 (permalink)
State Vice-Captain
 
Poker Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kilbirnie, Scotland
Posts: 1,105
Big score for SL - just one question: Why did Bangladesh put them in? Do they fancy themselves to chase 300 or did they think their bowlers could restrict SL?
Poker Boy is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 06:51 AM   #12 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
TT Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: .
Posts: 16,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poker Boy
Big score for SL - just one question: Why did Bangladesh put them in? Do they fancy themselves to chase 300 or did they think their bowlers could restrict SL?
Well the conditions were quite helpful at the beginning and the Sri Lanka batsman were rather watchful to begin with. So the captain probably thought he could snare a few out but he must have been dreaming or on crack considering the bowling attack he has. Sri Lanka could have got 350 plus if they liked, hardly any of the batsman got out of third gear.
TT Boy is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 07:06 AM   #13 (permalink)
Request Your Custom Title Now!
 
Jono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Virat Kohli
Posts: 47,521
Bloody Jayawardene. Was batting like a dream, and I have some cash on him to be SL's highest scorer this Champions Trophy. He could have easily tonned up if he didn't get carried away. He was putting away the Bangladeshi bowlers like they were from under 16s.
Jono is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 07:16 AM   #14 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Jungle Jumbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: England
Posts: 4,898
Farhad Reza is going to get found out against the better sides, you can't bowl inaccurate 75mph medium-pace from a small frame and expect to get away with it.

Bashar was clearly reluctant to use Rafique while the fielding restrictions were in place, which should not be the case. Rafique should be the first spinner into the attack, as he is good enough to pick up wickets even if he does leak a few early on. I didn't see anything of Saqibul, anyone know how well he bowled?
Jungle Jumbo is offline  
Old 07-10-2006, 07:22 AM   #15 (permalink)
Hall of Fame Member
 
TT Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: .
Posts: 16,321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jungle Jumbo
Farhad Reza is going to get found out against the better sides, you can't bowl inaccurate 75mph medium-pace from a small frame and expect to get away with it.

Bashar was clearly reluctant to use Rafique while the fielding restrictions were in place, which should not be the case. Rafique should be the first spinner into the attack, as he is good enough to pick up wickets even if he does leak a few early on. I didn't see anything of Saqibul, anyone know how well he bowled?
Started off poorly and it didn’t get much better, bowled far too much down the legside and then was just milked to high heaven. Bowled slow left arm but the Sky information bar had him down as a medium pacer.
TT Boy is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Group D - Pakistan, West Indies, Zimbabwe, Ireland James World Cup 2007 894 24-03-2007 06:35 AM
interesting article. sledger Cricket Chat 53 13-02-2006 03:48 PM
Predictions League Round 5 - Zimbabwe vs. West Indies marc71178 Cricket Web Predictions League 21 16-11-2003 10:13 AM
Round 4 - Zimbabwe vs. West Indies marc71178 Cricket Web Predictions League 26 08-11-2003 03:56 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web