Qualifying Round - Sri Lanka, West Indies, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe - Page 2

Jungle Jumbo · 07-10-2006, 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TT Boy

Started off poorly and it didn’t get much better, bowled far too much down the legside and then was just milked to high heaven. Bowled slow left arm but the Sky information bar had him down as a medium pacer.

Cricinfo mistake - they have him down as medium pace, but he's always been SLA.

LongHopCassidy · 07-10-2006, 07:49 AM

And Shahriar plays out a maiden. Never send a boy.......

Jono · 07-10-2006, 07:54 AM

Nafees gone.

NZTailender · 07-10-2006, 10:48 AM

...Malinga into his 11th over according to Cricinfo commentary.

godofcricket · 07-10-2006, 11:01 AM

Another good performance by bangladesh......losing by 37 runs for me is a victory for them considering they were chasing above 6 runs per over and they didnt loose 10 wickets in the end.

silentstriker · 07-10-2006, 11:04 AM

Yea, I am pretty impressed by Bangladesh. They did well to bat out 50 overs and put 267 on the board.

Jono · 07-10-2006, 11:04 AM

They handled Murali like a dream. One thinks if they just attacked Malinga a little more, and didn't let him settle into that short crap at the body so easily, they could have had more runs on the board early.

I'm really quite surprised as to how well they went, particularly once Ahmed and Bashar fell in the same over. The old Bangladesh would have crumbled to less than 150. And its not to say that SL were in cruise mode, they were busting their balls.

Quite proud of Bangladesh today. If only Nafees scored well.

Jungle Jumbo · 07-10-2006, 12:09 PM

Once again the top-order fails, but some really good cricket from Farhad and Saqibul who are really flourishing in internationals. The biggest debate now is how the bowling attack should be made up - Shahadat would have made a huge difference today, but it's hard to accomodate him without weakening any already fragile batting lineup. The most likely change is a straight switch with Rasel, but Farhad could get mullered again by the West Indies.

Dravid · 07-10-2006, 12:25 PM

Bangladesh scored more runs than I expected. Good batting from them even though they lost.

nightprowler10 · 07-10-2006, 02:43 PM

Yeah, its impressive that they didn't lose by much. From what I heard, the pitch was good enough where 302 was very much chasable. I credit their small margined loss to their bowling at the death rather than their batting.

JASON · 07-10-2006, 03:47 PM

Good score by Bangladesh to lose only by 37 chasing 300 plus. This after Ashraful and Nafees failed to score too many .
It may be not a bad strategy for them to bowl Rafique during power play (as Murali does and as a result gives more runs than some other spinners who bowl after power play ) as he seems to be their most economical bowler .

JASON · 07-10-2006, 03:57 PM

Great to see Marvan Atapattu back in the Team and among the runs. Good Century by Tharanga . Tougher games ahead , which count more than this one .

Against Zimbabwe SL may be better of playing CK , Ruchira and Bandara instead of Murali, Malinga and Maharoof , to give those 3 a chance to see what they can do .

Perm · 07-10-2006, 08:40 PM

I'd like to see more of Chamara Kapugedara and I hope he does get a game against, even if it is only against Zimbabwe he looks good for such a youngster. Great to see Upal Tharanga scoring a century, gifted ODI player when he gets set. Also good to see Atapattu back on the field and in the runs. Razzaq and Rafique kept it tight for Bangladesh which is good to see, shame nobody could support Saqibal Hasan. If he had a partner and scored quicker then it could've been a good win for Bangladesh. Promising signs early for them.

NZTailender · 07-10-2006, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perm

I'd like to see more of Chamara Kapugedara and I hope he does get a game against, even if it is only against Zimbabwe he looks good for such a youngster. Great to see Upal Tharanga scoring a century, gifted ODI player when he gets set. Also good to see Atapattu back on the field and in the runs. Razzaq and Rafique kept it tight for Bangladesh which is good to see, shame nobody could support Saqibal Hasan. If he had a partner and scored quicker then it could've been a good win for Bangladesh. Promising signs early for them.

Me too. His international record isn't flash but he has a lot of talent, probably the best I've seen in a young player in quite a while.

oz_fan · 08-10-2006, 03:25 AM

Zimababwe already struggling after 5 overs at 11/2.

07-10-2006, 10:48 AM	#19 (permalink)
NZTailender Hall of Fame Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand Posts: 19,046	...Malinga into his 11th over according to Cricinfo commentary. __________________ President of SKAS - Kat is King \| Proud member of CVAAS - One of the best \| LRPLTAS - Rosco rocks! The NZTailender Supporting XI: L Vincent, H Rutherford, N Broom, Craig Cachopa, D Brownlie, BJ Watling, D de Boorder+, I Sodhi, B Wheeler, H Bennett, A Milne Go Tigers! R.I.P. Fardin & Craig

07-10-2006, 11:01 AM	#20 (permalink)
godofcricket State 12th Man Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Lahore, Pakistan Posts: 724	Another good performance by bangladesh......losing by 37 runs for me is a victory for them considering they were chasing above 6 runs per over and they didnt loose 10 wickets in the end. __________________ Wasim Akram: The most sKiLlFuL bowler in history! Mcgrath said he is fond of the genius "Akram would power through the crease and do whatever he wanted with the old and new ball" Allan Border "If I ever get a chance to be reborn as a cricketer, I would want to be Wasim" Richards, Tendulkar and Waugh described Akram as the most dangerous bowler they had ever faced. > > > Wasims Magic Delivery. Late Swing. Hatrick. < < <

07-10-2006, 02:43 PM	#25 (permalink)
nightprowler10 Global Moderator Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Madhouse on Madison Posts: 13,389	Yeah, its impressive that they didn't lose by much. From what I heard, the pitch was good enough where 302 was very much chasable. I credit their small margined loss to their bowling at the death rather than their batting. __________________ Can't decide on a signature? Why not Zoidberg? (\/) (;,,;) (\/) RIP Craigos

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Group D - Pakistan, West Indies, Zimbabwe, Ireland	James	World Cup 2007	894	24-03-2007 06:35 AM
interesting article.	sledger	Cricket Chat	53	13-02-2006 03:48 PM
Predictions League Round 5 - Zimbabwe vs. West Indies	marc71178	Cricket Web Predictions League	21	16-11-2003 10:13 AM
Round 4 - Zimbabwe vs. West Indies	marc71178	Cricket Web Predictions League	26	08-11-2003 03:56 PM

07-10-2006, 07:54 AM	#18 (permalink)
Jono Request Your Custom Title Now! Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Virat Kohli Posts: 47,514	Nafees gone.

07-10-2006, 11:04 AM	#22 (permalink)
Jono Request Your Custom Title Now! Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Virat Kohli Posts: 47,514	They handled Murali like a dream. One thinks if they just attacked Malinga a little more, and didn't let him settle into that short crap at the body so easily, they could have had more runs on the board early. I'm really quite surprised as to how well they went, particularly once Ahmed and Bashar fell in the same over. The old Bangladesh would have crumbled to less than 150. And its not to say that SL were in cruise mode, they were busting their balls. Quite proud of Bangladesh today. If only Nafees scored well.

07-10-2006, 12:09 PM	#23 (permalink)
Jungle Jumbo International Vice-Captain Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: England Posts: 4,898	Once again the top-order fails, but some really good cricket from Farhad and Saqibul who are really flourishing in internationals. The biggest debate now is how the bowling attack should be made up - Shahadat would have made a huge difference today, but it's hard to accomodate him without weakening any already fragile batting lineup. The most likely change is a straight switch with Rasel, but Farhad could get mullered again by the West Indies.

07-10-2006, 12:25 PM	#24 (permalink)
Dravid International Captain Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: New Jersey, United States Posts: 5,096	Bangladesh scored more runs than I expected. Good batting from them even though they lost.

07-10-2006, 03:47 PM	#26 (permalink)
JASON Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: At Work Posts: 7,558	Good score by Bangladesh to lose only by 37 chasing 300 plus. This after Ashraful and Nafees failed to score too many . It may be not a bad strategy for them to bowl Rafique during power play (as Murali does and as a result gives more runs than some other spinners who bowl after power play ) as he seems to be their most economical bowler .

07-10-2006, 03:57 PM	#27 (permalink)
JASON Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: At Work Posts: 7,558	Great to see Marvan Atapattu back in the Team and among the runs. Good Century by Tharanga . Tougher games ahead , which count more than this one . Against Zimbabwe SL may be better of playing CK , Ruchira and Bandara instead of Murali, Malinga and Maharoof , to give those 3 a chance to see what they can do .

08-10-2006, 03:25 AM	#30 (permalink)
oz_fan International Regular Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 3,977	Zimababwe already struggling after 5 overs at 11/2.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)