Aus v USA - Page 3

Samuel_Vimes · 13-09-2004, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim

Massiah actually looks quite a good player...and he's only 24 so USA might have a star-player in the making.

The Windies will pick him up then, given that he's born in Guyana!

Nnanden · 13-09-2004, 04:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samuel_Vimes

Three no-balls, three wides in five overs..even the West Indies'd be ashamed of that...

panyangara however, is shocked at brett lee`s apparent lack of extras and writes a letter to the ACB

Waughney · 13-09-2004, 04:34 AM

United States of America 32/2 (10.0 ov)
They've had a slight recovery.

luckyeddie · 13-09-2004, 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Samuel_Vimes

Three no-balls, three wides in five overs..even the West Indies'd be ashamed of that...

McGrath was extremely impressive though - and Kasprowicz has struck immediately.

A dismissal to please Samuel Vimes - fishing outside off stump

Tim · 13-09-2004, 04:36 AM

Kaspo makes the immediate impact 32/3

Samuel_Vimes · 13-09-2004, 04:37 AM

Ah, finally a good bowler gets a wicket.

(well, apart from the fact that Alexander's been batting like a tail-ender...

)

howardj · 13-09-2004, 04:38 AM

There should be some type of by-law that prevents mis-matches of this ilk!! I mean, how does this sort of clash do anybody any good? It's so rare to get all the top teams together, and then the administrators serve up this tripe! It's a first-rate farce!

luckyeddie · 13-09-2004, 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by howardj

There should be some type of by-law that prevents mis-matches of this ilk!! I mean, how does this sort of clash do anybody any good? It's so rare to get all the top teams together, and then the administrators serve up this tripe! It's a first-rate farce!

You are being a little unfair. Australia aren't THAT bad.

Son Of Coco · 13-09-2004, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim

Massiah actually looks quite a good player...and he's only 24 so USA might have a star-player in the making.

His name suggests he could well be just what cricket in the U.S needed.

Son Of Coco · 13-09-2004, 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckyeddie

If the Aussies had a decent bowling attack, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but at first glance Brett Lee is having a hard time of it.

Going at just over 4 an over is not good against the U.S! But then I guess it depends on how they got them, edges all over the place, or fluid cover drives and pulls etc (or the last option, all in extras! haha).

luckyeddie · 13-09-2004, 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Son Of Coco

Going at just over 4 an over is not good against the U.S! But then I guess it depends on how they got them, edges all over the place, or fluid cover drives and pulls etc (or the last option, all in extras! haha).

It was the wides, no-balls and general Harmison-of-yesteryear-like rubbish I was getting at.

As I type, Kaspa gets a gift from the umpire.

Nnanden · 13-09-2004, 04:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Son Of Coco

Going at just over 4 an over is not good against the U.S! But then I guess it depends on how they got them, edges all over the place, or fluid cover drives and pulls etc (or the last option, all in extras! haha).

yes... if your read eddie uncles posts clearly you will see he was indeed saying the aussie attack doesnt seem too good at the mo, thus complying with your statement

Son Of Coco · 13-09-2004, 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckyeddie

It was the wides, no-balls and general Harmison-of-yesteryear-like rubbish I was getting at.

As I type, Kaspa gets a gift from the umpire.

I know what you were getting at. Don't worry, just agreeing.......it seems hard to do on here at times.

telsor · 13-09-2004, 05:15 AM

USA cracks 50!

OK, so it's 51/7, but still, it's more than many thought they'd get.

telsor · 13-09-2004, 05:48 AM

USA all out 65.

If my maths is right, Aus needs to make the runs in less than 12 overs to have a better RR than NZ.

13-09-2004, 04:34 AM	#33 (permalink)
Waughney International Debutant Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Outback Aus. Answer's yes, the middle of nowhere Posts: 2,699	United States of America 32/2 (10.0 ov) They've had a slight recovery. __________________ Member of MSC - Murali Supporters Club I'm not too dissimilar a batsman to Bradman. Both of us have batting averages below 100.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

13-09-2004, 04:36 AM	#35 (permalink)
Tim Cricketer Of The Year Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Auckland Posts: 7,888	Kaspo makes the immediate impact 32/3

13-09-2004, 04:37 AM	#36 (permalink)
Samuel_Vimes Cricket Web: All-Time Legend Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Oslo Posts: 22,255	Ah, finally a good bowler gets a wicket. (well, apart from the fact that Alexander's been batting like a tail-ender... )

13-09-2004, 04:38 AM	#37 (permalink)
howardj International Coach Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: brisbane Posts: 12,104	There should be some type of by-law that prevents mis-matches of this ilk!! I mean, how does this sort of clash do anybody any good? It's so rare to get all the top teams together, and then the administrators serve up this tripe! It's a first-rate farce!

13-09-2004, 05:15 AM	#44 (permalink)
telsor U19 12th Man Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 272	USA cracks 50! OK, so it's 51/7, but still, it's more than many thought they'd get.

13-09-2004, 05:48 AM	#45 (permalink)
telsor U19 12th Man Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 272	USA all out 65. If my maths is right, Aus needs to make the runs in less than 12 overs to have a better RR than NZ.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)