Go Back   Cricket Web > Archived Forums > Archived Forums > ICC Champions Trophy 2004



Finding Seams on Apples - Order Your Copy!


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2004, 06:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
State 12th Man
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wellington, NZ
Posts: 773
NZ Squad named - Franklin cut!

To make room for Kyle Mills, no less!

Stephen Fleming (captain), Nathan Astle, Ian Butler, Chris Cairns, Chris Harris, Hamish Marshall, Brendan McCullum (wicket-keeper), Craig McMillan, Kyle Mills, Jacob Oram, Michael Papps, Scott Styris, Daryl Tuffey, Daniel Vettori.

Remembering these were the same two players that created the most embarrassment for Bracewell's test selections, this must've taken some serious stones. The Dominion Post even called it "one of the most predictable New Zealand cricket line-ups in recent history" this morning, only to get it wrong themselves.

Franklin can be expensive, but he's also more than capable of taking the top off batting lineups in UK conditions. Bracewell is still clearly loving Mills' death bowling, and also loving Butler's pace, despite what can only be called run-haemorrhaging for Kent recently.
Kent is offline  
Old 10-08-2004, 07:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, especially as Franklin is currently playing in England.
__________________
marc71178 - President and founding member of AAAS - we don't only appreciate when he does well, but also when he's not quite so good!

Anyone want to join the Society?

Beware the evils of Kit-Kats - they're immoral apparently.
marc71178 is offline  
Old 10-08-2004, 03:09 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tim
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 7,888
it's strange considering Franklin & Adams have been bowling well for their respective counties.

Certainly I would have wanted to include one of those 2.
Other than that..yeah it was fairly predictable, with ?? over McMillan still.
Tim is offline  
Old 10-08-2004, 03:29 PM   #4 (permalink)
International Vice-Captain
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: .
Posts: 4,710
Personally I think that Flanklin should have been included...i fail to see the NZtors logic...
Mr. P is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 01:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
World Traveller
 
Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Super Happy Fun Sugar Lollipop Land!
Posts: 34,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by marc71178
Doesn't make a lot of sense to me, especially as Franklin is currently playing in England.
So is Adams, but as Bracewell said it is is a fairly settled line-up.

Michael Papps only real chance will be against the USA IMO.
__________________
Beware the lollipop of mediocrity. Lick once and you suck forever...

RIP Fardin Qayyumi, a true legend of CW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boobidy View Post
Bradman never had to face quicks like Sharma and Irfan Pathan. He wouldn't of lasted a ball against those 2, not to mention a spinner like Sehwag.
Craig is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 02:38 AM   #6 (permalink)
International Coach
 
tooextracool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: not far away from you
Posts: 14,304
im not surprised at all....he was wayward throughout the natwest series and was smashed all over the park in nearly every game.
__________________
Tendulkar = the most overated player EVER!!
Beckham = the most overated footballer EVER!!
Vassell = the biggest disgrace since rikki clarke!!
tooextracool is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 10:51 AM   #7 (permalink)
Eyes not spreadsheets
 
marc71178's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: England
Posts: 56,346
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craig
So is Adams, but as Bracewell said it is is a fairly settled line-up.

But Franklin has played Internationals as well.
marc71178 is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 04:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Dar
School Boy/Girl Captain
 
Dar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 154
The funniest thing is they say Mills will "add more flexibility to the bowling". It makes no sense when Franklin is a left armer so surely he'd be the one adding flexibilty?????
Dar is offline  
Old 11-08-2004, 06:19 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tim
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 7,888
Bracewell's reasoning was that Australia like to play on the on-side quite alot. Franklin tends to bowl into the legs so Bracewell believed Mills would be better suited to play against Australia.
Tim is offline  
Old 12-08-2004, 08:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
Cricketer Of The Year
 
Arjun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 7,837
Quote:
Bracewell is still clearly loving Mills' death bowling
Complete with no-ball six-balls?
__________________
"Talent is nothing without opportunity"
"You're not remembered for aiming at the target, but hitting it"

Twenty20 used to be boring.

Sponsored...by...nothing!!!
Arjun is offline  
Old 13-08-2004, 01:24 AM   #11 (permalink)
You'll Never Walk Alone
 
Nnanden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New South Wales
Posts: 26,190
adams` non-selection isnt too suprising, but franklins is slightly... i just wish bond was back!! ahhhhhhhhhh
__________________
Jesus saves

proudly supporting Liverpool FC
Nnanden is offline  
Old 13-08-2004, 10:52 AM   #12 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canberra, ACT
Posts: 2,585
like most others I'm also surprised to see Mills in the squad ahead of Franklin - yet again I don't think Franklin has been given enough time to settle into the squad & has been discarded too early again..............particularly as he is currently playing in the conditions & using the Duke ball - whereas I have no idea what Mills is up to...........

so far as Mills is concerned I presume he will be the back up seamer primarily as cover for Tuffey's injury.............

I'm begining to think that Butler may be a bit like Olsen Filipaina used to be for the NZRL - struggled for the club but grew another 10' taller wearing the silver fern...........or so I'm hoping..........

given the venue & likely conditions it is a predictable squad with Papps likely to be the batting cover...............
anzac is offline  
Old 17-08-2004, 08:00 PM   #13 (permalink)
Cricket Web Staff Member
 
Richard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 2005
Posts: 80,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
it's strange considering Franklin & Adams have been bowling well for their respective counties.
9.5-60-1.
Franklin's figures in his season for Gloucs.
Brilliant!
IIRC Adams hasn't been very economical, either.
Andre Adams has had how many chances at the ODI level and has been found wanting almost exclusively, with the exceptions of the very bowler-friendly home series against England and India. Franklin has done even worse.
__________________
RD
Appreciating cricket's greatest legend ever - HD Bird...............Funniest post (intentionally) ever.....Runner-up.....Third.....Fourth
(Accidental) founder of Twenty20 Is Boring Society. Click and post to sign-up.
Quote:
chris.hinton: h
FRAZ: Arshad's are a long gone stories
RIP Fardin Qayyumi (AKA "cricket player"; "Bob"), 1/11/1990-15/4/2006
Richard is offline  
Old 20-08-2004, 12:57 AM   #14 (permalink)
State 12th Man
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Wellington, NZ
Posts: 773
Richard, you've missed the point I think. NZ selection debates typically aren't about who'll never be world-beaters, they're about someone being more deserving of a particular place than someone else.

Right now, Franklin and Adams arguably have better cases to be options in our squad than Butler and Mills. Butler has been leaking runs at an alarming rate for Kent with only a handful of scalps in either form of the game, while Mills hasn't had a decent stretch of play since his unconvincing OD series against South Africa.

Mills has never been a bowler known for making deep inroads into top-orders in the past, and Bracewell's argument that he'll be suited to playing Australia (having barely played them to date) is a bold assertion.

Last edited by Kent; 20-08-2004 at 01:00 AM.
Kent is offline  
Old 20-08-2004, 10:41 AM   #15 (permalink)
International Debutant
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canberra, ACT
Posts: 2,585
my main concern regarding Franklin being dropped from the ICC OD side is that it may foreshadow his being dropped from the Test squads again as happened following the VB series in 2001 - IMO he is better suited to the longer game..............
anzac is offline  
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©2001 - 2011, Cricket Web