• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

3rd Test (Lord’s) - 10 July to 14 July

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
As long as he can field at gully, he can replace NKR. But I do think NKR deserves more rope, mainly because I definitely see his swing bowling being useful to us in this series, going forward.
 

Silver Silva

International Vice-Captain
Subcontinent sides are notoriously woeful at developing seamer all rounders , sometimes patience is needed , they don't need to be Imran Khan or Kapil Dev those are once in a lifetime players , they just need to do a solid job ..

Having that 4th seamer option that allows you to rotate 3 seamer workload is invaluable in SENA
 

Bahseph

International Debutant
Sorry for the vague comment. I mean has he been playing any FC cricket? My concern is if he can make it through a game, but Stokes bowling does help that.
 

Johan

Hall of Fame Member
He played one FC game in last 5 years, the management is mostly banking on his natural talent and a spicy Lord's pitch.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Subcontinent sides are notoriously woeful at developing seamer all rounders , sometimes patience is needed , they don't need to be Imran Khan or Kapil Dev those are once in a lifetime players , they just need to do a solid job ..

Having that 4th seamer option that allows you to rotate 3 seamer workload is invaluable in SENA
I mean Reddy kind of has to show that first, no? As it stands he has no real evidence he can step up as a bowling option, and Gill clearly doesn't trust him enough to throw the ball yet.
 

Silver Silva

International Vice-Captain
I mean Reddy kind of has to show that first, no? As it stands he has no real evidence he can step up as a bowling option, and Gill clearly doesn't trust him enough to throw the ball yet.
Needs an opportunity to show , in the past India didn't manage the likes of Hardik Pandya and Irfan Pathan for Test Cricket
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year

Across that Australian series, Bumrah induced more false shots than any other bowler from either side in absolute numbers (259) or percentage (28.4%), a testament to his wicket-taking prowess. However Mohammed Siraj and Harshit Rana were not far behind, inducing false shots at rates of 24.0% and 24.2% respectively, both surpassing Pat Cummins' 23.2%, who led the home team attack with 25 scalps.
Interestingly, Akash Deep topped India's false shot charts with 28.8% in the two matches he featured in. Despite this, he only managed five wickets at an expensive average of 54.
 
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
This highlights how traditional metrics can misrepresent a bowler's true effort. Consider Akash's intriguing battle with Steven Smith at the Gabba, where he consistently beat the bat with little reward. He induced 13 false shots from Smith in that innings - the second most by a bowler against Smith in a Test innings Down Under - yet couldn't dismiss him.
Akash Deep replicated this tally in the next Test at the MCG, finally snaring Smith's prized wicket off the 13th false shot he induced. While Bumrah claimed a wicket every 8.9 false shots, Akash Deep's figure stood at 33.7 false shots per wicket, underscoring the role of luck despite the persistent pressure he created.
 
Last edited:

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
When you get pitches we've been providing for tests for the last few years its little wonder there are so many false shots.
 

Top