Shane Bond was a more skilled bowler as well, as was Bruce Reid. And actually, Jimmy's skillset is underrated. Don't think skills were really what kept him apart from that top echelonI just think Roberts is a more skilled bowler.
They didn't have enough of a career to be judged really, Roberts did, especially with World Series Cricket.Shane Bond was a more skilled bowler as well, as was Bruce Reid. And actually, Jimmy's skillset is underrated. Don't think skills were really what kept him apart from that top echelon
Yeah and his career is just worse than Jimmy's more than twice long one.They didn't have enough of a career to be judged really, Roberts did, especially with World Series Cricket.
their away averages say everything that needs to be said.Yeah and his career is just worse than Jimmy's more than twice long one.
Home kinda does too.their away averages say everything that needs to be said.
Yeah but that's kind of my point, Jimmy was too reliant on cloud cover and dukes to be better than Roberts, great bowler with a long career but the quintessential fairweather bowler with some nice performances outside it, here and there but never consistent.Home kinda does too.
In Home matches over Roberts' career, the overall average was 32 and of WI bowlers was 27.3 with Croft leading with 17 playing 10 of his 18 games. Roberts was just relatively mid at home. Don't think has the record to justify being placed over Cummins, Walsh, Pollock, Rabada and Jimmy. Definitely on the very same tier but at the bottom with the least longevity and 2nd worst average.Yeah but that's kind of my point, Jimmy was too reliant on cloud cover and dukes to be better than Roberts, great bowler with a long career but the quintessential fairweather bowler with some nice performances outside it, here and there.
I'd argue even Snow has a fair case over Jimmy, let alone Roberts.In Home matches over Roberts' career, the overall average was 32 and of WI bowlers was 27.3 with Croft leading with 17 playing 10 of his 18 games. Roberts was just relatively mid at home. Don't think has the record to justify being placed over Cummins, Walsh, Pollock, Rabada and Jimmy. Definitely on the very same tier but at the bottom with the least longevity and 2nd worst average.
You could argue, and your arguments can be wrong. If you unironically argue Snow>Anderson, I will honestly put it on the same tier as Greenidge>Weekes (@Thala_0710 will be happy)I'd argue even Snow has a fair case over Jimmy, let alone Roberts.
I won't argue for that and I don't believe that but I find it funny how we are turning a guy nicknamed Clouderson into a complete Bowler and picking him over all condition potent bowlers when he wasn't rated this way throughout his career. I don't think Roberts>Anderson in 2020 or 21 would be controversial, same with Bedser.You could argue, and your arguments can be wrong. If you unironically argue Snow>Anderson, I will honestly put it on the same tier as Greenidge>Weekes (@Thala_0710 will be happy)
Nah it won't. Greenidge>Weekes will stay unbeaten for a while.You could argue, and your arguments can be wrong. If you unironically argue Snow>Anderson, I will honestly put it on the same tier as Greenidge>Weekes (@Thala_0710 will be happy)
Bro I am not saying there's a big gap or anything but Jimmy has nearly thrice the wickets at 1 run higher average.I won't argue for that and I don't believe that but I find it funny how we are turning a guy nicknamed Clouderson into a complete Bowler and picking him over all condition potent bowlers when he wasn't rated this way throughout his career. I don't think Roberts>Anderson in 2020 or 21 would be controversial, same with Bedser.
And in 2025, it's still not controversial (at least shouldn't be)I won't argue for that and I don't believe that but I find it funny how we are turning a guy nicknamed Clouderson into a complete Bowler and picking him over all condition potent bowlers when he wasn't rated this way throughout his career. I don't think Roberts>Anderson in 2020 or 21 would be controversial, same with Bedser.
It's like Harvey vs JayawerdeneBro I am not saying there's a big gap or anything but Jimmy has nearly thrice the wickets at 1 run higher average.
Would be if Roberts had an away country like Harvey's SA, or Anderson sucked away like Jayawardene. It's not.It's like Harvey vs Jayawerdene
What does Anderson average away again?Would be if Roberts had an away country like Harvey's SA, or Anderson sucked away like Jayawardene. It's not.
Including UAE, 266 @29.83What does Anderson average away again?
So yes, he sucks awayIncluding UAE, 266 @29.83
Roberts at home: 72 @28.75