MasterBlaster24
U19 Debutant
.
Should that be included?Benaud thanks to captaincy.
How the hell the counts as an allrounder skillset?Benaud thanks to captaincy.
It might for some people. Interesting when looking at the allrounder page on Wikipedia it said Ali Bacher had some statistical thing in 2013 and claimed there had only been 42 genuine allrounders in cricket history. (he ranked Sobers as the greatest, followed by Kallis) However following sources and further searching hasn’t led me to the entire list. Quite curious about the other 40. I believe it was touched on in his book Jacques Kallis and 12 other Great South African Allrounders.How the hell the counts as an allrounder skillset?
That part of the book (not sure if the entirety was) available for free online and I read quite a bit of it. He began with describing that "a true all-rounder" is someone who averages over 40 with the bat and below 30 with the ball, 1 WPM minimum. But with minimum 20 Tests, no one but Aubrey Faulkner (and Eddie Barlow on including the RoW vs ENG Series which originally had Test status) made the cut. So he reduced it to 25 batting and 35 bowling. Well, as a result, Benaud didn't made the cut but Stuart Broad did.It might for some people. Interesting when looking at the allrounder page on Wikipedia it said Ali Bacher had some statistical thing in 2013 and claimed there had only been 42 genuine allrounders in cricket history. (he ranked Sobers as the greatest, followed by Kallis) However following sources and further searching hasn’t led me to the entire list. Quite curious about the other 40. I believe it was touched on in his book Jacques Kallis and 12 other Great South African Allrounders.
Very generous for it to be described as a statistical analysis imo.That part of the book (not sure if the entirety was) available for free online and I read quite a bit of it. He began with describing that "a true all-rounder" is someone who averages over 40 with the bat and below 30 with the ball, 1 WPM minimum. But with minimum 20 Tests, no one but Aubrey Faulkner (and Eddie Barlow on including the RoW vs ENG Series which originally had Test status) made the cut. So he reduced it to 25 batting and 35 bowling. Well, as a result, Benaud didn't made the cut but Stuart Broad did.
He ran an SQL query in a statsguru database.Very generous for it to be described as a statistical analysis imo.
It would be clearly Jadeja if his bowling stood up more outside home. But it doesn't, a lot of the times not even on 4th-5th day pitches offering turn.It's clearly Jadeja. People will get over the Dev nostalgia after Jadeja retires.
FTR Beau WebsterHe ran an SQL query in a statsguru database.
Matches Played: from 20
Batting Average: from 25
Bowling Average: To 35
And just then add the 1 WPM cut-off.
+ 1It would be clearly Jadeja if his bowling stood up more outside home. But it doesn't, a lot of the times not even on 4th-5th day pitches offering turn.
ATG definition.That part of the book (not sure if the entirety was) available for free online and I read quite a bit of it. He began with describing that "a true all-rounder" is someone who averages over 40 with the bat and below 30 with the ball, 1 WPM minimum. But with minimum 20 Tests, no one but Aubrey Faulkner (and Eddie Barlow on including the RoW vs ENG Series which originally had Test status) made the cut. So he reduced it to 25 batting and 35 bowling. Well, as a result, Benaud didn't made the cut but Stuart Broad did.
Who do you think is the best AR here?
Because it impacts game results.How the hell the counts as an allrounder skillset?
It's Jadeja for Garner's batting.Benaud thanks to captaincy.
Like, is that a good thing.Because it impacts game results.
Benaud will make an average team competitive and a great team unbearable.
That makes him a better cricketer but not really a better all-rounder imo, not the same question.Because it impacts game results.
Benaud will make an average team competitive and a great team unbearable.